U.S. Judge Upholds NSA Phone Surveillance Program(nytimes.com)
nytimes.com
U.S. Judge Upholds NSA Phone Surveillance Program
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/12/27/us/politics/27reuters-usa-security-aclu.html
2 comments
Anything's lawful, when corrupt politicians write the law. Ethical and moral? not so much.
I wonder how much dirt/money is paid to the judge by NSA proponents/backers/leaders to side on their side, when the vast majority of Americans are against it.
In fact aren't laws supposed to take the side of the majority? When the majority is against a law, shouldn't it fail to be a law? American's are fastly losing faith in our lawmakers, and like currency a law w/ no faith backing it isn't worth the paper it's written on.
I'm going to start manufacturing toilet paper w/ the Constitution on, and sell it to politicians, they already wipe their asses on the Constitution, might as well do it literally.
I wonder how much dirt/money is paid to the judge by NSA proponents/backers/leaders to side on their side, when the vast majority of Americans are against it.
In fact aren't laws supposed to take the side of the majority? When the majority is against a law, shouldn't it fail to be a law? American's are fastly losing faith in our lawmakers, and like currency a law w/ no faith backing it isn't worth the paper it's written on.
I'm going to start manufacturing toilet paper w/ the Constitution on, and sell it to politicians, they already wipe their asses on the Constitution, might as well do it literally.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_split
[2] "We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final." A saying by Justice H. Jackson.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_H._Jackson