The great GC vs reference counting debate « LShift Ltd.(lshift.net)
lshift.net
The great GC vs reference counting debate « LShift Ltd.
http://www.lshift.net/blog/2013/09/19/the-great-gc-vs-reference-counting-debate
2 comments
The unsafe language argument of the first paragraph doesn't hold. You can design you API such that handles are copied by value, and opaquely contain pointer. Usually the handle IS the pointer, but it doesn't have to be this way. When you do this, you are able to perform exactly the same kinds of memory operations that a virtual machine would perform.
Interesting. Assuming the author is correct, do most browsers think they will be able to get away with their memory management 'hybrid' implementations in the future?