Storing students' papers for plagiarism detection is 'Fair Use'(arstechnica.com)
arstechnica.com
Storing students' papers for plagiarism detection is 'Fair Use'
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/headline-here.ars
6 comments
I was about to make the same point, only not is so much detail.
If the schools REQUIRE students to submit their papers in order to receive a grade, the binding agreement might not as well be there, since the students have no choice but to agree.
Why didn't the students' lawyers focus on this point?
If the schools REQUIRE students to submit their papers in order to receive a grade, the binding agreement might not as well be there, since the students have no choice but to agree.
Why didn't the students' lawyers focus on this point?
The case is not about clickwrap agreements. Footnote 8 reads:
> In light of our "fair use" analysis, we decline to address the question of whether the terms of the Clickwrap Agreement created an enforceable contract between plaintiffs and iParadigms.
In other words: the court ignored the clickwrap agreement issue, because the fair use analysis was decisive.
> In light of our "fair use" analysis, we decline to address the question of whether the terms of the Clickwrap Agreement created an enforceable contract between plaintiffs and iParadigms.
In other words: the court ignored the clickwrap agreement issue, because the fair use analysis was decisive.
And the lower court found that the clickwrap agreement was fully enforceable. So: lower court found it enforceable, higher court declined to address it, that's it.
The higher court is essentially being lazy here.
The higher court is essentially being lazy here.
In my school (a Swedish University) we sometimes have to turnin our papers via Urkund which is similar to TurnIn, although we don't sign anything in doing so. I read that I can opt-out of having my paper used outside of my local university though, I'm not sure why that would matter to me but at least that's something.
The main thing that worries me with outsourcing these types of things is that how could you defend yourself if the system finds you guilty of plagiarism when the source isn't open. It's not like false-positives can't happened and it seems perfectly reasonable that it should happened with an increasing rate as the system grows.
I've learned to use wikis, version control systems (which granted I should have been using prior to that anyways..) and other ways of keeping a history of how my work progresses so that if I at some point would have to defend myself I can actually show the entire process behind something and not just the finished product.
My biggest fear when it come to being accused of cheating is getting called out on the spot and then not being able to answer because my brain shuts down, like how many people curse themselves for not being able to answer job-interview engineering questions even though they knew the answer. Instant expulsion unless I guess you proclaim you are guilty and beg for your life, then maybe come of with a warning.
The main thing that worries me with outsourcing these types of things is that how could you defend yourself if the system finds you guilty of plagiarism when the source isn't open. It's not like false-positives can't happened and it seems perfectly reasonable that it should happened with an increasing rate as the system grows.
I've learned to use wikis, version control systems (which granted I should have been using prior to that anyways..) and other ways of keeping a history of how my work progresses so that if I at some point would have to defend myself I can actually show the entire process behind something and not just the finished product.
My biggest fear when it come to being accused of cheating is getting called out on the spot and then not being able to answer because my brain shuts down, like how many people curse themselves for not being able to answer job-interview engineering questions even though they knew the answer. Instant expulsion unless I guess you proclaim you are guilty and beg for your life, then maybe come of with a warning.
Personally, I'd sue the University for making me sign over the rights of my written work to a company in order to get a grade. I'd be fine if I was just giving them the right to archive it, but the license says that it is a "a non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, world-wide, irrevocable license to reproduce, transmit, display, disclose, archive and otherwise use in connection with its Services". Seriously? As anyone who writes often knows, it's a difficult process, and I'll be damned if I sign over the right to reproduce by writing to a company royalty-free. I'm an English minor and I haven't encountered this yet, but if I do I'll be sure to keep the HN community apprised.
... especially if "its Services" changes. They simply need to be able to (1) archive; and (2) reproduce in a grievance hearing should someone contest a charge of plagiarism. I suspect that is all they are really trying to be able to do.
But a couple of bad quarters have a way of making business models change.
But a couple of bad quarters have a way of making business models change.
This is a good issue to teach students about civil disobedience. If you are an A student and you refuse to turn your papers in to turnitin, are your teachers really going to fail you? No, they won't.
Especially since No Child Left Behind, A-level students are a prized asset to every school. Schools will really pay attention if a bunch of A-level students work together against a school policy, risking their own GPA. Send out a press release to the local press about your protest and your entire city will be working with you. Nobody likes these kinds of "guilty until proven innocent" policies.
Even a single student protesting alone really risks very little by refusing to submit his paper to turnitin. Teachers want their students to succeed, and it is difficult for them to explain to a parent "I gave your student a lower grade on a technicality even though his work was excellent."
Some teachers might try to play hard ball but if you are persistent you will win.
Especially since No Child Left Behind, A-level students are a prized asset to every school. Schools will really pay attention if a bunch of A-level students work together against a school policy, risking their own GPA. Send out a press release to the local press about your protest and your entire city will be working with you. Nobody likes these kinds of "guilty until proven innocent" policies.
Even a single student protesting alone really risks very little by refusing to submit his paper to turnitin. Teachers want their students to succeed, and it is difficult for them to explain to a parent "I gave your student a lower grade on a technicality even though his work was excellent."
Some teachers might try to play hard ball but if you are persistent you will win.
Aside from the high school alluded to in this story, I've never seen Turnitin used in a high school context - one would think that HS papers generally aren't sophisticated enough to make it difficult to tell if there's been some plagiarizing.
In the university context, however, I've seen it used pretty heavily - and if you think that professors won't give out failing grades for people who refuse to submit their papers to it, you're (in my experience) dead wrong, seeing as the edict to make student use it generally comes down from the department heads.
We had a small controversy about this a few years ago at my old school. Some very smart students refused to submit their papers, and got Fs on them (for papers which all parties agreed were A- or better work). They eventually took it all the way through the university grievance process to the school Senate, where the decision was overturned and the new policy created: you can either submit your paper to Turnitin, or you can hand in all your notes and rough drafts with the work to be graded.
In the university context, however, I've seen it used pretty heavily - and if you think that professors won't give out failing grades for people who refuse to submit their papers to it, you're (in my experience) dead wrong, seeing as the edict to make student use it generally comes down from the department heads.
We had a small controversy about this a few years ago at my old school. Some very smart students refused to submit their papers, and got Fs on them (for papers which all parties agreed were A- or better work). They eventually took it all the way through the university grievance process to the school Senate, where the decision was overturned and the new policy created: you can either submit your paper to Turnitin, or you can hand in all your notes and rough drafts with the work to be graded.
I vividly remember hating dealing with Turnitin way back when I was a freshman in high school, which was like 5-6 years ago. I'm not sure what the point was, since there was way more cheating going on during exams than there was plagiarism in English essays.
On a small sidenote, my last college English class involved a group project that also included some individual writing as well. Unbeknownst to the rest of us, one member decided to copy and paste her submission straight from Wikipedia. Pproving that everyone else had no part in her stupidity took an unhealthy amount of time, especially when the person in question kept insisting she didn't plagiarize anything. Sophisticated indeed.
On a small sidenote, my last college English class involved a group project that also included some individual writing as well. Unbeknownst to the rest of us, one member decided to copy and paste her submission straight from Wikipedia. Pproving that everyone else had no part in her stupidity took an unhealthy amount of time, especially when the person in question kept insisting she didn't plagiarize anything. Sophisticated indeed.
No one else in the group recognized that the writing wasn't hers?
Admittedly it was our fault for not realizing where the writing came from, but she was the straggler in the group that never participated in our email conversations and sent us her portion of the project the hour before it was due. I know there's always a slacker in a group project, but none of us imagined she would have done what she did...we just thought she was just procrastinating and so someone else quickly proofread for egregious grammar mistakes and then sent it off. Then in the individual work related to the group project (i.e. our thoughts, the work we did, etc.) she claimed just like we did that it was all her original writing.
So it ended up being a mess and the rest of us four being accused of academic dishonesty too because she wouldn't stop insisting that we were lying about her, until we came up with our separate and complete email conversations consisting of a couple hundred emails with research and drafts and my versioned work (thank goodness for svn?) which included what the others did with no trace of her writing and nothing but excuses and delays in her emails. I think I've learned from my mistakes (but too bad something like turnitin isn't available to students, heh).
So it ended up being a mess and the rest of us four being accused of academic dishonesty too because she wouldn't stop insisting that we were lying about her, until we came up with our separate and complete email conversations consisting of a couple hundred emails with research and drafts and my versioned work (thank goodness for svn?) which included what the others did with no trace of her writing and nothing but excuses and delays in her emails. I think I've learned from my mistakes (but too bad something like turnitin isn't available to students, heh).
+1 for using svn for schoolwork. No matter what schoolwork I did, if it was on a computer it was in a repo. Nothing beats a plagiarism accusation like being able to provide 40 revisions of your previous work spread over a few months.
My wife just confirmed that my son uses it and he's a freshman in a public high school.
I wish I thought of this back in my high school english classes and got everyone together to not submit anything. However, all the teachers I remember did give failing grades for assignments not submitted to turnitin. If you had enough failing assignment grades, obviously, you fail the class. The reasoning would be that you had to complete your entire assignment, which involved submitting to turnitin and physically to the teacher by the due date, to receive the maximum amount of credit.
Failing that, not turning it in made the teacher question your "academic honesty". Very frustrating, especially as I remember there were some students that found it very difficult to get access to a computer to even type up their essays, let alone internet connections to submit online.
Failing that, not turning it in made the teacher question your "academic honesty". Very frustrating, especially as I remember there were some students that found it very difficult to get access to a computer to even type up their essays, let alone internet connections to submit online.
There is another way to protest: attack the credibility of turn-it-in. Publish drafts of your papers all over the web where the Turn-it-in bot is sure to find them. Wikipedia would also be a great place to submit fragments of your papers. then submit fragments of your papers and your friends' papers directly to turn-it-in seperately before you submit your own paper. Then all your papers will come up as false positives. When the instructors confront you, produce the original papers as evidence that you were just copying yourself (which is totally allowed).
As far as I know, Turn-it-in doesn't really provide the instructor with a good way of verifying the original source of a paper. So, it is difficult for instructors to use turn-it-in as evidence of plagerism when students are gaming the system like that. It is also why anybody that challenges an accusation of plagerism based on evidence from these services will always win (at least in court).
As far as I know, Turn-it-in doesn't really provide the instructor with a good way of verifying the original source of a paper. So, it is difficult for instructors to use turn-it-in as evidence of plagerism when students are gaming the system like that. It is also why anybody that challenges an accusation of plagerism based on evidence from these services will always win (at least in court).
I am so incredibly sold on that idea, it's just such a shame I don't have classes where turnitin is used :(
However, I do remember that most of my HS english teachers were aware of the possibility of false positives. Their first reaction wasn't to accuse anyone of plagiarism, they just asked to see drafts and research related to the paper in question - or any sort of evidence to show that you were legitimately working on something. Turnitin for them was just automated checking to see if anyone was stupid enough to buy an essay or copy something near verbatim.
However, I do remember that most of my HS english teachers were aware of the possibility of false positives. Their first reaction wasn't to accuse anyone of plagiarism, they just asked to see drafts and research related to the paper in question - or any sort of evidence to show that you were legitimately working on something. Turnitin for them was just automated checking to see if anyone was stupid enough to buy an essay or copy something near verbatim.
A friend of mine told me that she had basically used one well written generic paper to get though almost all of the essays required in college because the subject of her paper was so generic and applicable to the field she was studying (psychology). If TurnItIn were to "catch" someone for re-using their own work, I would say that TurnItIn is violating the fair use of the student because it is penalizing the student for being able to re-use previous drafts that were written by the student.
I'm sure teachers don't condone the idea of students re-using previously submitted work from another class, but I think that it is a legitimate right and just shows how ignorant some teachers are who accept papers on generic subjects.
There are probably other specific places where TurnItIn could arguably be abusive of ownership beyond fair use, but there needs to be a specific context to the situation.
I'm sure teachers don't condone the idea of students re-using previously submitted work from another class, but I think that it is a legitimate right and just shows how ignorant some teachers are who accept papers on generic subjects.
There are probably other specific places where TurnItIn could arguably be abusive of ownership beyond fair use, but there needs to be a specific context to the situation.
It always seemed like fair use to me
This court case is actually about clickwrap agreements, not fair use. Though the courts spent a fair amount of time blathering about fair use, the clickwrap agreement was already decisive. The only reason that the fair use argument was even mentioned was because one of the plaintiffs "hacked" the system, using a password not intended for him and (apparently) not agreeing to the clickwrap agreement.
There's actually a really ugly line of reasoning in the cases about making contracts with minors. The minors were required to use Turnitin (sign over their copyright in their papers for free) by their schools. Since Turnitin didn't coerce them (the schools did), it's not a contract of adhesion. Since they received some consideration from it (the ability to graduate from their schools!), they cannot escape from the contract due to their being minors. SO: as a business owner, if you can get schools to require that students do X which benefits you, they have no hope of escaping from it legally, even if X is grossly unfair to the students.
Let's consider: how much would Stephen King's/Madonna's/Oprah Winfrey's/Barack Obama's student papers be worth today? We don't know, because no one required them to use an archiving service that could sell them later on. But in just a few years, some people from the Turnitin.com generation will be reaching superstardom, and Turnitin can sell copies of their student papers to all comers. I suspect that the value of selling specific student papers will far exceed all other revenues ever realized by Turnitin.