BTC $141 USD(mtgox.com)
mtgox.com
BTC $141 USD
https://mtgox.com/#
16 comments
I bought a domain at Namecheap. That sent me over to BitPay which I gave the current USD price in BitCoins and an hour later Namecheap had accepted the payment.
And two days later you regretted not hoarding the bitcoin instead.
I don't, the price was good and the amount was tiny. Sure it would have been better today but I needed it yesterday.
That wasn't the point though, the point is yes, you can buy stuff and it's simple. Apart from the hour it takes to confirm the transaction (this is done by the BitCoin network, nothing any user or particular party needs to do) it was much less of a hassle than paying with a credit card... at least if you already have the BitCoins.
That wasn't the point though, the point is yes, you can buy stuff and it's simple. Apart from the hour it takes to confirm the transaction (this is done by the BitCoin network, nothing any user or particular party needs to do) it was much less of a hassle than paying with a credit card... at least if you already have the BitCoins.
Almost nobody is buying anything with bitcoin. At least 99% of the bitcoin price is due to speculation.
A currency which changes in value by around 40% in a 24 hour period is completely useless for the transactions I mostly deal with. We worry about a few percent change over weeks and insist on hedges.
Imagine saying to someone - I'll put 1000 BTC into your venture when you reach the next milestone in two months. What's that going to be? USD 100,000? USD 50,000? USD 1.50?
Imagine saying to someone - I'll put 1000 BTC into your venture when you reach the next milestone in two months. What's that going to be? USD 100,000? USD 50,000? USD 1.50?
"A currency which changes in value by around 40% in a 24 hour period is completely useless for the transactions I mostly deal with"
1. IIRC Silk road uses some average price rather than the spot price
2. Does anyone provide BTC hedging? Seems like a pretty useful and profitable service.
1. IIRC Silk road uses some average price rather than the spot price
2. Does anyone provide BTC hedging? Seems like a pretty useful and profitable service.
To enable hedging, someone would have to take a forward position in USD/BTC .. and at the moment, the market is in contango ( see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contango ) which means that the sentiment is that the price will continue to increase for the near term ... ie you'd have to be very brave indeed in order to put a limit on the expected BTC price.
"you'd have to be very brave indeed in order to put a limit on the expected BTC price."
Or quote a fairly aggressive price (so that the hedger pays a significant premium for the service)
Also, how are you getting futures/forward prices on USDBTC?
Or quote a fairly aggressive price (so that the hedger pays a significant premium for the service)
Also, how are you getting futures/forward prices on USDBTC?
Standard bubble advice applies here.
1) the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. (Keynes)
2) a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Bank your profits. It turns exponential gains into linear gains, throwing away a huge amount of potential profits. But a small amount of real profit is worth more than a huge amount of potential profit.
1) the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. (Keynes)
2) a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Bank your profits. It turns exponential gains into linear gains, throwing away a huge amount of potential profits. But a small amount of real profit is worth more than a huge amount of potential profit.
Just sold my BTC for about 75% profit within a few weeks, still probably gonna bite myself in the ass if Bitcoin ever hits 1000 USD
75% profit within few weeks seems EXTREMELY good to me. I can't really see the problem (yes, I know for a emotional point of view. Just think about 75% in a few weeks)
Think of it as a chance to invest in something tangible and productive.
Remember the saying: no one ever gets fired for taking profits
"a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Bank your profits. "
Are you implying that banks are safer way to store wealth then Bitcoin? #Cyprys ;)
Are you implying that banks are safer way to store wealth then Bitcoin? #Cyprys ;)
What happened in Cyprus will not happen in the US. It's far easier to just print a ton of money than it is to confiscate or force a bank collapse (and Cyprus didn't have that option because they don't have control over EUR)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-t17wziSnA&t=26s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-t17wziSnA&t=26s
Sure, the means are different, but the end result of printing tons of money is loss of value, same as outright theft.
Only difference is scale: theft from depositors vs. theft from all those holding the inflated currency.
Only difference is scale: theft from depositors vs. theft from all those holding the inflated currency.
In the short term you're probably right. In the very long term all fiat currencies collapse, so yeah it will happen here, eventually.
You have to have an engineers perspective. All manmade bridges collapse. That doesn't mean they're not useful, or its going to fall over tomorrow. But delusions of immortality are not realistic.
You have to have an engineers perspective. All manmade bridges collapse. That doesn't mean they're not useful, or its going to fall over tomorrow. But delusions of immortality are not realistic.
They sure are. Just not in Cyprus.
[deleted]
But it's still not a bubble, no sir, the bitcoin economy has just really kicked in to the tune of 40% growth in the last 24 hours...
The latest price is always here:
http://bitcoinity.org/markets.
I'm not sure that a new submission is required every day.
http://bitcoinity.org/markets.
I'm not sure that a new submission is required every day.
I'm sure they are not required and they are annoying even. Especially when the submission adds absolutely nothing. And as a bonus links to a page that is not valid few minutes after posting.
I'm surprised that someone hasn't started another Bitcoin yet. Is it harder than just changing some initial seed? Because the artificial scarcity of digital currency is what's allowing for these high prices.
Then all you need is intermediary parties that will exchange your V2 Bitcoins for V1 Bitcoins (which will currently have the highest acceptance for buying things). Over time, V2, V3 etc. may even become accepted directly by merchants, if they become big enough.
UPDATE: Thanks for the info on additional ones. This is getting really interesting. So my initial scarcity hypothesis was wrong, which means it's just pure herd mentality. Hopefully over time the availability of multiple currencies will lead to some sort of equilibrium though.
Then all you need is intermediary parties that will exchange your V2 Bitcoins for V1 Bitcoins (which will currently have the highest acceptance for buying things). Over time, V2, V3 etc. may even become accepted directly by merchants, if they become big enough.
UPDATE: Thanks for the info on additional ones. This is getting really interesting. So my initial scarcity hypothesis was wrong, which means it's just pure herd mentality. Hopefully over time the availability of multiple currencies will lead to some sort of equilibrium though.
Litecoin.
Namecoin.
Ixcoin.
Ppcoin.
Terracoin.
Devcoin.
Actually, there's a lot of other virtual curriences, see for examples: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=134179.0
Yesterday 2nd popular one, Litecoin (LTC) more than doubled its value.
Yesterday 2nd popular one, Litecoin (LTC) more than doubled its value.
That's a lot of tulips.
cough sell now cough
Yet people aren't. Apparently there's still enough belief to warrant this kind of growth.
(..getting ready to eat my own words, real soon..)
(..getting ready to eat my own words, real soon..)
Surely this madness has to end soon?
Also seriously regretting not buying it when it was "expensive" at <$5 :(
Also seriously regretting not buying it when it was "expensive" at <$5 :(
Some of us bought ours around $.85 and sold when there was no way it could go any higher around $30.
Not being fluent in the ins and outs of bitcoin: what is driving this? Is it pure speculation? Are more people trying to get in on the BTC wagon (riding the Cyprus wave)?
Speculation.
There doesn't seem to be any evidence that (in the world of BTC) the Cyprus situation has triggered anything other than rampant speculation by non-cypriot libertarians who already distrust central banks and now have a boogeyman to point at.
There doesn't seem to be any evidence that (in the world of BTC) the Cyprus situation has triggered anything other than rampant speculation by non-cypriot libertarians who already distrust central banks and now have a boogeyman to point at.
Nobody really knows. The common thought is that as more merchants start accepting BTC, it becomes more viable as a stand-alone currency and therefore more valuable. Facts seem to contradict this theory as 40% overnight growth cannot represent a 40% growth in the BTC economy. Thus either we undervalued BTC all along, or it is against bubble.
What was driving the price of gold for the past decade?
Yes.
It makes impossible for a developer to charge BT on any service. Tell me how you do it without being overpriced the next day.
Calculate the exchange rate automatically? This is not 1900.
Really? I wasn't my point. I was talking about make use of the bitcoin value as a statement. Of course I can charge in Yens and convert it on the fly to dollars or pounds, but that wasn't the point.
It's really to make Btc popular on a website when every refresh can bring you a new value. It's horrible for business. Btc right now is only useful for trade than for other low end business operations as paying one month of hosting or buying a toy.
It's really to make Btc popular on a website when every refresh can bring you a new value. It's horrible for business. Btc right now is only useful for trade than for other low end business operations as paying one month of hosting or buying a toy.
Price your goods in USD and do the conversion at payment time.
Didn't think of that idea did you?
Didn't think of that idea did you?
But then you're not really charging BTC, you're charging USD but allowing BTC as a payment mechanism of USD.
This is a feature not a bug. Also its much more valuable for the endpoints to be dissimilar payment regimes because financial transfers have obscene fees at this time. You double the currency exchange cost while eliminating all transfer fees. Transfer fees to go from my employers NYC bank checking account to my local credit union checking account are pretty low. On the other hand hopping borders and using multiple payment processors adds up pretty quick and the rates are extremely high for small transactions.
So?
I cannot ----ing believe it. I thought there would be a bump when it hit $100, but not this much. It's just insane, I was calling it a bubble since $30, and it's doubled again and again..
I wonder how low the crash will go? I'm guessing it won't be below $30.
I wonder how low the crash will go? I'm guessing it won't be below $30.
Depends how many people get badly burned by this I would have thought. It could pretty easily drop to almost nothing if confidence is completely bust, as the 'fundamentals' supporting the price of BTC are far from obvious.
If it drops to $15, I'm going to try to get a physical Casascius coin just for the hell of it:
https://www.casascius.com/
https://www.casascius.com/
Whenever the crash happens, we'll have so many threads generated telling us to "get in now!" and the speculation will begin anew.
I guess the y-axis should be logarithmic at his point.
I still don't understand how a nonexistent coin could be worth anything. No really. How does solving an algorithm translate into value?
It doesn't.
'Value' comes from people's perception. The fact(s) that they can't (until the crypto is broken) be counterfeited or double spent (within reason/time limits), and that there are a limited amount ever, and that transfer is decentralised and unregulated, these things give them value to some people.
The actual hashing work done is useful to provide the above features. IMHO it is not useful in and of itself.
Note that I'm not really an advocate of bitcoins either, but I have taken a bit of time to try and understand them. The limited quantity and decentralisation are not positive features of a currency (again, IMHO)
'Value' comes from people's perception. The fact(s) that they can't (until the crypto is broken) be counterfeited or double spent (within reason/time limits), and that there are a limited amount ever, and that transfer is decentralised and unregulated, these things give them value to some people.
The actual hashing work done is useful to provide the above features. IMHO it is not useful in and of itself.
Note that I'm not really an advocate of bitcoins either, but I have taken a bit of time to try and understand them. The limited quantity and decentralisation are not positive features of a currency (again, IMHO)
Value, be it in gold or silver or USD or EUR or bitcoin or cars or art, is a perceived phenomenon. Something has value because others are willing to trade it for goods and services (or for other forms of value). Gold and silver are trusted stores of value because they have been used in that capacity for centuries (and for a very long time, USD were silver certificates so there was real metal backing the paper)
The underlying value of BTC, IMO, is the anonymity feature (the ability to conduct commerce without a clear centralized record identifying you by name). Once that is compromised, it's not clear what value BTC will have.
The underlying value of BTC, IMO, is the anonymity feature (the ability to conduct commerce without a clear centralized record identifying you by name). Once that is compromised, it's not clear what value BTC will have.
Anonymity is not really the selling feature of bitcoin - in fact it really only offers pseudo-anonymity.
The fact that no-one else can just "print" bitcoins, and that you can transfer funds at internet speed to anybody else anywhere in the world and that (after a short time), the transaction cannot be reversed are the main utilities.
The fact that no-one else can just "print" bitcoins, and that you can transfer funds at internet speed to anybody else anywhere in the world and that (after a short time), the transaction cannot be reversed are the main utilities.
Yes, I think it is possible, in the long run, to figure out who's behind a wallet, assuming that the Bitcoin use is frequent and convenient (meaning no-super-high-inconvenient-counter-measures are used, but a regular use of currency)
In that case, my concern is that I think it will be possible to determine ALL the transactions of that wallet. Making it even less anonymous than regular currencies.
I could be missing something, but if confirmed, that could be a problem for using Bitcoin as a regular currency
In that case, my concern is that I think it will be possible to determine ALL the transactions of that wallet. Making it even less anonymous than regular currencies.
I could be missing something, but if confirmed, that could be a problem for using Bitcoin as a regular currency
There are various laundering schemes, and there's nothing stopping you using new wallets constantly.
But yes, in effect, every transaction is traceable and public, AFAICT.
But yes, in effect, every transaction is traceable and public, AFAICT.
Yes, I understand that there are things that you can do. But, as those are in the way of convenience, we can assume that not everyone will take the extra effort to create constantly new wallets, etc.
So, in case someone can trace you to a wallet, that someone can know all your transactions (of course, only the transactions for that wallet), which is a huge potential privacy risk.
So, in case someone can trace you to a wallet, that someone can know all your transactions (of course, only the transactions for that wallet), which is a huge potential privacy risk.
I still don't understand how a piece of rock could be worth anything. No really. How do some carbon atoms translate into value?
Value is a transient concept, many things we assume to be inherently valuable are simply based on the assumption everyone else will continue to value them as much (or more) as they do now.
Value is a transient concept, many things we assume to be inherently valuable are simply based on the assumption everyone else will continue to value them as much (or more) as they do now.
Yes but there is nothing backing up the solving of the algorithm. The rock came from somewhere and can be put back to be picked up again. A bitcoin comes from nowhere and is a magnetic action away from being wiped into nothing.
Bitcoin is b<censored>t, a nonsense bubble waiting to burst. The emperor is wearing bitcoin.
Bitcoin is b<censored>t, a nonsense bubble waiting to burst. The emperor is wearing bitcoin.
Houses crumble, cars break down, money burns. Just as possible to be wiped into effectively nothing. Yet these things retain value.
I don't think that bitcoins are worth what people are willing to pay, but then I feel the same about diamonds.
I don't think that bitcoins are worth what people are willing to pay, but then I feel the same about diamonds.
A year or two ago a group in .ch (which is not China, BTW) organized a group buy of Debian logo'd swiss army knives. I got in on the deal and unfortunately ended up paying well over 50% the cost of the knife in various transfer fees. So my "$25 knife" or whatever it was ended up costing me about $50. First I needed to convert from dollars to euros, then an international xfer, then into something kinda like a cross between what americans would call paypal and a checking account I believe it was the iban system where I basically sent money to a number almost exactly like paypal would send money to an email addrs. Nobody would do stuff like this unless they were desperate or crazy or just didn't care so the financial cartels tacked on incredible fees at each step. Oh if only we could have made a transaction with BTC. It takes about 5 minutes to make a BTC transaction so the currency risk is pretty minimal compared to the 50%+ fees from traditional currency changers. Given those numbers, even during an active crash its safer/cheaper to use BTC than traditional forms of transfer.
Anyway the value of a bitcoin solely due to transfers is (how much money the world is transferring across borders with BTC today) / (how many BTC are available for that kind of transfer/trading today) with a correction factor for velocity of money today. So if a billion bucks a day flows outta $dying_country and there's ten thousand BTC in the trading pool being used to transfer the money, and the velocity of money is the btc change hands a thousand times a day, then the price delta due to Cyprus/whatever would therefore be "about" $100 per individual BTC on top of whatever existing value due to other transfers and such. These numbers are pretty well made up but this is generally where very long term price estimates end up. So assuming BTC someday approaches 1% of paypals volume, then given paypals well known transfer volume stats, and some realistic estimates of the BTC trading pool size, the price per BTC would be...
Much like EE work this valuation benefits from a hydrologic comparison. So given hoover dam, how much does a gallon of water weigh? Well if you know how many pounds of water fell over the dam per day, and you know how many gallons of water fell over the dam per day, and one day's worth of water takes exactly one day to fall over the dam, then a gallon of water would seem to weigh x pounds...
Anyway the value of a bitcoin solely due to transfers is (how much money the world is transferring across borders with BTC today) / (how many BTC are available for that kind of transfer/trading today) with a correction factor for velocity of money today. So if a billion bucks a day flows outta $dying_country and there's ten thousand BTC in the trading pool being used to transfer the money, and the velocity of money is the btc change hands a thousand times a day, then the price delta due to Cyprus/whatever would therefore be "about" $100 per individual BTC on top of whatever existing value due to other transfers and such. These numbers are pretty well made up but this is generally where very long term price estimates end up. So assuming BTC someday approaches 1% of paypals volume, then given paypals well known transfer volume stats, and some realistic estimates of the BTC trading pool size, the price per BTC would be...
Much like EE work this valuation benefits from a hydrologic comparison. So given hoover dam, how much does a gallon of water weigh? Well if you know how many pounds of water fell over the dam per day, and you know how many gallons of water fell over the dam per day, and one day's worth of water takes exactly one day to fall over the dam, then a gallon of water would seem to weigh x pounds...
Wowsers.
Whereas I've sent money between accounts in all sorts of countries for next to nothing. I think whoever organised your group buy screwed up, badly. And by the sounds of it so did you.
Whereas I've sent money between accounts in all sorts of countries for next to nothing. I think whoever organised your group buy screwed up, badly. And by the sounds of it so did you.
LOL content free post. It does bring up the interesting question of what is the cheapest way to transfer money internationally. Obviously my example won't set any (good) records. Neither side were willing to use paypal so that's off the table (does paypal even do business in .ch?). Silver coins in a postage envelope maybe? A fat stack of Postal IRC (international reply coupons)? I think its going to be pretty hard to transfer money cheaper than "basically free" like BTC.
I'm just pointing out that your convoluted example of the knife (which I've heard somewhere before...) isn't necessarily a typical experience. There are a variety of ways to transfer money around for a variety of fee structures.
For instance I used a company called moneycorp last year to transfer a few tens of thousands of dollars between Australia and the UK. They had a low conversion fee, used market exchange rates and there was no fee at all between them and the banks involved at either end. Painless and cheap.
BTC may be basically free if BTC are wanted at both ends, otherwise there are conversion fees there too, as well as a variety of delays. And there are transaction fees (though these are small).
For instance I used a company called moneycorp last year to transfer a few tens of thousands of dollars between Australia and the UK. They had a low conversion fee, used market exchange rates and there was no fee at all between them and the banks involved at either end. Painless and cheap.
BTC may be basically free if BTC are wanted at both ends, otherwise there are conversion fees there too, as well as a variety of delays. And there are transaction fees (though these are small).
[deleted]
My problem with this rate of change is that it makes it harder to use it as a means of buying things.
If I see an item for sale for 2.5BTC then it can take me an hour to translate my GBP into BTC. Then I carry out the exchange, and then they have to transfer it back to their currency (if they want to spend it on most things).
If the value has gone up 15% in that time then what price should they be charging me?
Should a shopfront be updating its prices on an hourly basis?
I'm all for BTC being valuable, but it needs to have _some_ stability to be used as a method of value exchange.