Show HN: From an idea to the Valley in less than a month(shareme-app.com)
shareme-app.com
Show HN: From an idea to the Valley in less than a month
http://www.shareme-app.com/
71 comments
You and me both, man. This is one of those aspects of society -- and it does seem to be pretty ubiquitous at this point -- that I just don't get. It makes me feel weirdly out of sync.
I've been putting extra effort lately into putting up lots of boundaries. I carry my cell phone a lot less. I'm slower to return calls. My email replies are brief and sporadic. It's really nice.
I see people spending a lot of time alternating between Facebook and email and texting on their phone, and ... I'm not sure if I've gone crazy, or everyone else has.
The idea behind this app, cool as it is technically, makes me a little bit sick to my stomach.
I've been putting extra effort lately into putting up lots of boundaries. I carry my cell phone a lot less. I'm slower to return calls. My email replies are brief and sporadic. It's really nice.
I see people spending a lot of time alternating between Facebook and email and texting on their phone, and ... I'm not sure if I've gone crazy, or everyone else has.
The idea behind this app, cool as it is technically, makes me a little bit sick to my stomach.
>I'm not sure if I've gone crazy, or everyone else has.
Welcome to Old.
Welcome to Old.
Agree. The default expectation today in society is "I contacted that person, he/she should respond" instead of "I contacted that person, he/she will respond if needed" (of course, there are exceptions like emergency calls, family etc). Why would I want to know who is in a meeting with who, and if they are available or not? Why would I want others to know what I am upto? This totally escapes me
This is the main reason why I went the other way round when developing Tehula[1]. The basic idea is that knowing the location of someone should be the exception and not the norm, and that the burden should be put on the one requesting the location and not the locatee (who should have the right to ignore a request too).
[1]:http://tehula.com
[1]:http://tehula.com
I think it comes from thinking about "what do I want" problem the wrong way. "What do I want" isn't "What would I like the world to be like for me" it's "what would I like to use in the world as it actually exists"
My hypothesis is that apps that aren't about sharing what you're DOING but rather what you'd like to do, especially in the short term, will ultimately be more useful. I don't want people to know what I'm doing or where I am, but I might like them to know where I'd like to be, with them, later tonight.
My hypothesis is that apps that aren't about sharing what you're DOING but rather what you'd like to do, especially in the short term, will ultimately be more useful. I don't want people to know what I'm doing or where I am, but I might like them to know where I'd like to be, with them, later tonight.
I agree with this. I don't like the way we always need to have an excuse for not answering the phone. Sometimes it is because I'm busy coding. Some other times I may just not feel like answering the phone, and I think that's fine too. I'll call you back eventually, don't worry.
As John says, no criticism of the app itself, rather a rant about the you-should-be-available-everywhere-and-anytime mentality!
As John says, no criticism of the app itself, rather a rant about the you-should-be-available-everywhere-and-anytime mentality!
Not sure if it's just me, but I don't really make phone calls to anyone except parents and a few other family members. With everyone else, friends and work related, I prefer to skype-- usually a scheduled time, but sometimes impromptu. On the flip side, I don't get that many phone calls either. Most other types of communication is asynchronous.
> there's no need for me to explain to people why I am not answering.
To give them an idea of how long to wait before trying again. It's consideration for the time of others.
To give them an idea of how long to wait before trying again. It's consideration for the time of others.
That's why we have voicemail. If I'm not available leave me a message.
I could talk for hours about the times I've been legitimately unable to take a call and had people repeatedly call my desk/mobile phone and either (A) refuse to leave a voicemail, thinking calling back repeatedly for 20 minutes would work or (B) filled my voicemail to capacity with multiple messages throughout the day.
Hours.
Hours.
Cancel your desk phone, and train your friends/colleagues to use voice mail or SMS. And try to use a voice-to-text service like Google Voice, so you get an email when they leave you a message.
Seriously, it's highly productive. At least it was for me.. It's their interest to reach you, that's why they are calling you and not the other way around.
Seriously, it's highly productive. At least it was for me.. It's their interest to reach you, that's why they are calling you and not the other way around.
That is a social disease.
[deleted]
How does the caller know if you're the type to use voicemail? (I never check mine, if it's urgent you would have called back) How often will you check your voicemail, if at all? Hourly? Once a day? Maybe the call is semi urgent, it can wait an hour but not a day.
Key point: knowing why you're not taking the call is valuable information to the caller.
Key point: knowing why you're not taking the call is valuable information to the caller.
Send an email? Most voicemail systems will have a little flashing light on top when you have a message waiting.
If I'm trying to write a tricky piece of code and you keep calling me, a) I will be annoyed and b) my mobile will go off, my email client will go off and the land line will be unplugged from the wall.
What are you going to do now? Put on a gorilla suit and come jump up and down on my desk? Learn some class.
If I'm trying to write a tricky piece of code and you keep calling me, a) I will be annoyed and b) my mobile will go off, my email client will go off and the land line will be unplugged from the wall.
What are you going to do now? Put on a gorilla suit and come jump up and down on my desk? Learn some class.
You are correct that that information is valuable to the caller.
To me that's, in general, not an acceptable information flow. It's a side channel that reveals information that I don't think people in general need to have.
To me that's, in general, not an acceptable information flow. It's a side channel that reveals information that I don't think people in general need to have.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Why do you need investors if you have finished your app? Shouldn't you focus on trying to generate profit instead?
Most startups are too afraid to face the reality of a real business model.
"We will start making money in 6 months" is not good enough.
"We will start making money in 6 months" is not good enough.
At first build a park, invite tons of people and then place a lemonade stand.
(if you'll place it too early you will screw your viral ratio)
.. or make lemonade and wait for your first few customers. Learn from their feedback, improve & iterate. Market to even more potential customers (just like you would have when you first build your park).
Both are valid models. In my town, there is a free water park with a REALLY expensive hot dog stand right outside.
I have no idea what this time line is trying to tell me and I have no idea what this app is about ... just me?
It's not just you. Their graphic designer is clueless. He can draw pretty pictures, but has no idea how to deliver the message effectively. All it needs is a bullet list of what the app does and maybe a screenshot.
I really don't think it's that bad. Though I think they made a big mistake starting with the first entry on the right side. I read the second entry first, and kinda missed it.
Nothing wrong with being a bit creative, but they didn't nail that experience.
Nothing wrong with being a bit creative, but they didn't nail that experience.
So the landing page is a timeline of what happened to this project and no link to try/download etc..?
Exactly. Because the app is not finished yet. Seems like the page is more a pitch to investors than a real product landing page.
App is done and would be released soon...
If you have the attention of people now, let them play with the Alpha version now so you can learn truth fast about how others perceive the problem, and your hypothesis that your app has the ability to solve it.
Also, don't sweat all of the negative posts. It is way too easy to pick holes in the work of others, especially at an early stage.
Do however look for the common themes commenters dislike, as your next code/design/pr effort can address these.
Also, don't sweat all of the negative posts. It is way too easy to pick holes in the work of others, especially at an early stage.
Do however look for the common themes commenters dislike, as your next code/design/pr effort can address these.
If this is an investor pitch, it's missing one critical piece of info - namely, how will it make money? Or am I just old-fashioned in thinking a business should make money?
Old fashioned. Money is magical in the Valley which is why free apps and services are worth billions.
But in all seriousness it doesn't look like an investor's pitch to me. I think its just about getting some buzz and users. Personally I wouldn't use it but I know people who would.
But in all seriousness it doesn't look like an investor's pitch to me. I think its just about getting some buzz and users. Personally I wouldn't use it but I know people who would.
Amen, brother. I mentor at startup events and this is my number one beef.
A feature is not an app. An app is not a business. Startups are businesses, and it's only a business if customers give you money.
If you are pitching a startup, always include a plausible hypothesis about how you will make money. It could be wrong, but so could every other thing in your pitch.
A feature is not an app. An app is not a business. Startups are businesses, and it's only a business if customers give you money.
If you are pitching a startup, always include a plausible hypothesis about how you will make money. It could be wrong, but so could every other thing in your pitch.
Moving on to the Android app seems like a mistake.
Curious, what makes you think this?
Probably better to gain traction on one platform first. If it is working out well you have found the recipe and it's likely to work on other plattforms as well. By adding other platforms you will multiply the userbase by 3 in the best case. Increasing the installed base on one plattform in an early stage will be more effective.
In many cases I'd say you are right, but the scope of this application looks limited enough to be able to port the application part over to Android really fast, especially if the author already has experience developing for Android.
Most of the work for this product is probably in the backend, which I assume does not need to be changed to service Android clients.
Most of the work for this product is probably in the backend, which I assume does not need to be changed to service Android clients.
And you need investors' money for... ?
To buy at least a couch
That's such a WTF answer. Who gives a shit if you have a couch?
Read that story, they're currently sleeping on the floor...
And the investors should care about that why?
Sleep is kinda important (http://www.inc.com/margaret-heffernan/the-truth-about-sleep-...)
Who says they should?
I think this is an interesting concept. I have a few questions, though, which I suspect could be commonly asked:
- What's the incentive for me to use this? Why not simply switch my phone off? It seems as though the core benefit is to answer the question, "Why isn't X answering their call?", but there's no clear incentive for X to share this. In fact, if X is busy, it's unlikely they will have the time to update their status.
- How do you explain to a non-technical user how this differs from Twitter or Facebook or Foursquare? How do you respond to a user telling you "I don't have time for another social network"?
- Have you thought about how to prevent "feature creep"? I see simplicity as the core selling point of this app, but I can also see strong pressure from investors to build this out until it turns into a generic social network.
Anyway, it looks visually stunning and I'm excited to see where you take it.
- What's the incentive for me to use this? Why not simply switch my phone off? It seems as though the core benefit is to answer the question, "Why isn't X answering their call?", but there's no clear incentive for X to share this. In fact, if X is busy, it's unlikely they will have the time to update their status.
- How do you explain to a non-technical user how this differs from Twitter or Facebook or Foursquare? How do you respond to a user telling you "I don't have time for another social network"?
- Have you thought about how to prevent "feature creep"? I see simplicity as the core selling point of this app, but I can also see strong pressure from investors to build this out until it turns into a generic social network.
Anyway, it looks visually stunning and I'm excited to see where you take it.
Status setting is done automatically, no interaction is required... You only have to choose locations you would like to share.
You can also make your own visibility settings for each user you have in contact list. It's up to you, what you would like to share
That last screenshot is really confusing, you might want to clean that concept up a bit.
Outside of that, here's my dilemma; even if I was crazy social, Facebook/FourSquare/Gowalla know where I am and offer me more incentives to post my locations and activities through them. What does this offer me? The problems you list that motivated you to create this app are easily solved by ignoring your phone or sending texts. If I'm busy, I'm too busy to update an app my friends probably won't even check. If I'm relaxing, I don't want people to know where I am and what I'm doing because I'm trying to relax. Ignoring them, which is the current method for handling these problems, is easier to do than what you are proposing.
I think you need to find a better reason for people to use something like this, which I think would be more relevant to families and possibly remote co-workers, and go from there.
Outside of that, here's my dilemma; even if I was crazy social, Facebook/FourSquare/Gowalla know where I am and offer me more incentives to post my locations and activities through them. What does this offer me? The problems you list that motivated you to create this app are easily solved by ignoring your phone or sending texts. If I'm busy, I'm too busy to update an app my friends probably won't even check. If I'm relaxing, I don't want people to know where I am and what I'm doing because I'm trying to relax. Ignoring them, which is the current method for handling these problems, is easier to do than what you are proposing.
I think you need to find a better reason for people to use something like this, which I think would be more relevant to families and possibly remote co-workers, and go from there.
It's pretty, looks well designed.
Why not validate it first? I think you should look for investors when you have first experience growing your first user base, see how the adoption amongst users will be etc. This is a difficult model to grow.
Why not validate it first? I think you should look for investors when you have first experience growing your first user base, see how the adoption amongst users will be etc. This is a difficult model to grow.
This is a one of a kind landing page; simply explains the problem and solution but does so in an incredibly novel, succinct and eye-catching way with a perfect call to action button targeted at investors.
Extremely well done!
Extremely well done!
I really like the landing page too.
However, I agree with other posters that I don't see the business model, nor the need for the Android app before gaining traction/validating the business model.
However, I agree with other posters that I don't see the business model, nor the need for the Android app before gaining traction/validating the business model.
Good idea. Its so simple that it might work. People want to know what you are doing (proof: social networks), and with this they would know if you are available to do something. I get it. Cool. It has good potential. I wish I had an app that would tell people when I was unavailable becuase I'm in a meeting or just coding. I know voicemail and SMS can do this, but those two options require that they contact me. I dont want any type of contact to be made from their part. They see the status and just leave me the fuck alone.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Another social-contacts-statuses-sharing thing, is this really needed?
I like this product - and could see myself using it.
I'm curious if you are using native region monitoring for iOS?
I'm do Product & Business Development for Gimbal (http://www.gimbal.com) - and think I have a solution that you can use to help you on the geo-fencing side.
Feel free to email me and I can give you some use-case examples and intro you to one of my engineers that can help you integrate/test out our SDK.
I'm curious if you are using native region monitoring for iOS?
I'm do Product & Business Development for Gimbal (http://www.gimbal.com) - and think I have a solution that you can use to help you on the geo-fencing side.
Feel free to email me and I can give you some use-case examples and intro you to one of my engineers that can help you integrate/test out our SDK.
So you are building an app to provide the convenience of skype stati (available, away, busy, invisible, offline) to people who use phones to call people?
Nothing wrong with that but I don't see me updating another app while the information is in most cases available somewhere else. For the app to be useful I would need to give it even more information than I do with all other platforms while the benefit is that people aren't annoyed because I don't take their calls.
Nothing wrong with that but I don't see me updating another app while the information is in most cases available somewhere else. For the app to be useful I would need to give it even more information than I do with all other platforms while the benefit is that people aren't annoyed because I don't take their calls.
it seems like all you have to do is convince you friends to install the app and set locations / status they want to share and the app ( uses geo fencing ? ) updates the status for them and you when they enter those areas.
HOW WILL THIS MAKE MONEY
I like this a lot, but just to ask, how do you plan on solving the critical mass problem?
Why should I use your service if none of my friends are?
Why should I use your service if none of my friends are?
You're already starting with a full list of contacts from your smartphone address book.
+Guys have prepared also some tweaks for distribution.
But, none of my other contacts will have a status unless they have your app, right?
But you can invite them to use it, it's the simplest and fastest way
I see, but what if I only have a mobile number available for some of my contacts. Will it send them a text asking them to join?
I'm sure it's going to be an awesome app though, I'll happily sign up. I'd like an easier way to take my friends with me. Also, I'd love Twitter integration.
I'm sure it's going to be an awesome app though, I'll happily sign up. I'd like an easier way to take my friends with me. Also, I'd love Twitter integration.
[deleted]
Will it be another closed-garden communication app, or will it follow established standards? (eg. this XMPP extension that allows for location/activity statuses http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0163.html)
I find it kind-of interesting how common features on IM services can be rebranded into a startup.
it's also funny that I can't think of any IM services that are making money.. or rather I have no idea how they make money.
however it seems like with geo fencing and a willingness to share your address book with a new service it can do all the work for you, so it might be useful, but profitable? without selling contact info i don't get. ads in the status screen?
however it seems like with geo fencing and a willingness to share your address book with a new service it can do all the work for you, so it might be useful, but profitable? without selling contact info i don't get. ads in the status screen?
For example, I feel that a sharing app that let's people know "Ah. John's not answering the phone because he's in the middle of a meeting with Mr F Barbaz" is the wrong way to deal with others. There's no need for people to have that information, and there's no need for me to explain to people why I am not answering. I am simply not available.
I wrote, somewhat tangentially, about the need for a new 'not available' social norm in a piece about long haul flights: http://blog.jgc.org/2010/06/archive-of-my-newstilt-stories.h...
To me these sharing status apps are a sign of an unhealthy idea that people are always available unless they come up with some good reason not to be. The only people who might actually need to know where I am because of some emergency are few in number (my parents, my spouse, my boss) and they can always SMS me a '911' text message.
PS None of that should be seen as a criticism of this person's app or work. There may be a large market for this which simply excludes me.
PPS It's worth thinking through what are the 'acceptable' reasons for not answering a call. In a meeting? On the toilet? Thinking? Writing code? Staring out the window letting your mind wander? And who makes that judgement. To me the simplest solution is to not answer when I don't want to and not be accountable to others for why I did not answer.