HN Proposal
6 comments
Number 1 rule for a website:
Never change the default UI drastically without either:
For this change you are suggesting, method b) cannot be used, so it must be a), which adds complexity to an otherwise very simple site for no reason as the functionality to do this already exists.
Never change the default UI drastically without either:
a) Offering a method to go use the old way.
b) Doing the change slowly so that users won't notice.
For this change you are suggesting, method b) cannot be used, so it must be a), which adds complexity to an otherwise very simple site for no reason as the functionality to do this already exists.
I'm in the habit of opening the link and the discussion (if any) in tabs immediately after each other. Then I can flit back and forth as required. Middle click - tab open - job done. I think your suggestion would slow me down.
It also doesn't work in those cases where there is, as yet, no discussion, as often happens with my submissions 8-(
Perhaps there should be a new link that opens a new window with left and right frames, left with the article, right with the discussion.
It also doesn't work in those cases where there is, as yet, no discussion, as often happens with my submissions 8-(
Perhaps there should be a new link that opens a new window with left and right frames, left with the article, right with the discussion.
It is a tough decision to make a change to the UI at this point. However, if things are going downhill for HN (or even beginning to or expected to), a change like that may benefit the structure.
In any case, personally I think that the discussions here are great, and I'm thankful for it. Just thought making discussions more prominent might emphasize the selling factor of this site.
In any case, personally I think that the discussions here are great, and I'm thankful for it. Just thought making discussions more prominent might emphasize the selling factor of this site.
I have so many things to adjust to every day. This one isn't something I would like to add to the list.
It is a fine idea and your rational is solid. Just one more things to deal with though. I have to vote against it.
It is a fine idea and your rational is solid. Just one more things to deal with though. I have to vote against it.
That sounds too much like slashdot. I do not want to see "RTFA" enter the HN lexicon.
it /might/ be better - but you can't make that kind of UI change now.
Instead of making the main heading link to the article, make it link to the discussion, regardless. Have a "view article" link where "discuss" is currently, to allow readers to view the article.
Although a simple change, I think it would change the overall view of HN drastically.
What are your thoughts?