How to answer a question: a simple system(michaelnielsen.org)
michaelnielsen.org
How to answer a question: a simple system
http://www.michaelnielsen.org/ddi/how-to-answer-a-question-a-simple-system/
3 comments
Large companies have known for a long time that your dataset is more important than your algorithms.
Data is facts and algorithms are basically opinions of the developer. A smarter developer may have more correct opinions on how data is related, but it will always be skewed by the limited perspective of the developer.
Data is facts and algorithms are basically opinions of the developer. A smarter developer may have more correct opinions on how data is related, but it will always be skewed by the limited perspective of the developer.
slightly off-topic, but relevant for the future of this technology.
I love Sci-Fi novels such as Peter Hamilton's "Reality Dysfunction" where an AI does the function of all local and central government in a habitat for no personal gain and every single person is connected to it real time on a personal basis.
The day we can move from the slimy self preserving low-life which seems to inhabit this space now will be a better day for everyone.
I wonder how close we are?
I love Sci-Fi novels such as Peter Hamilton's "Reality Dysfunction" where an AI does the function of all local and central government in a habitat for no personal gain and every single person is connected to it real time on a personal basis.
The day we can move from the slimy self preserving low-life which seems to inhabit this space now will be a better day for everyone.
I wonder how close we are?
About as close as we are to having election laws changed in the U.S. so that a third-party candidate would actually have a chance -- not close at all. The existence of a better/fairer alternative is irrelevant if the "slimy self preserving low-lifes" have enough power to keep themselves in power.
Or
What you think is sophisticated, isn't.
How would you demonstrate which it is?