Ask HN: Is the role of the interviewer being reduced/automated away?
1 comments
HR and company bureaucracy work constantly to remove agency from all workers at many companies, including interviewers. In any case I've seen, the actual people who will be working with the person don't care about the HR stuff at best, and at worst it actively interferes with them efficiently hiring good candidates. Seeing stuff like this just a red flag it's a shitty company, or at least a bureaucracy (there are some that appeals to) that doesn't value individual agency of job candidates or hiring teams
Aside from the roundabout way of trying to draw more information from your past, I also think, this question is something I'd expect to get in face-to-face or onsite interview, not in an online application. And I've seen more and more questions regarding soft skills, in things that are now being "front-loaded" in a form instead of saved for a live interview.
To my knowledge, interviewing has never been a dedicated job but something that different employees might need to do from time to time. Seems like online applications and assessments like these are an impetus, maybe helped by HR or others, to diminish the role of interviewing so that employees can perform their main role more often. Does it follow a goal of trying to reduce and streamline the time employees spend on face-to-face interviews? I find it a problem because a lot of useful data from interviews is not just in the initial question but in the follow-up that can lead to other interesting tangents to learn more about the candidate, something that can't be done well with online forms.
I have never interviewed others for hiring so I lack this perspective. I'd like to hear what interviewers see in these types of approaches of moving more interview questions to online questionnaires, if it's reduced your role as an interviewer, and other ways that tools might be reducing that role, if any at all.