The OS Wars: We Have A Winner(sourceforge.net)
sourceforge.net
The OS Wars: We Have A Winner
http://sourceforge.net/blog/os-wars/
13 comments
FWIW I was being curious:
$ cd /usr/local/Library/Formula
$ ls -l | wc -l
1807
$ cat * | grep url | grep sourceforge | wc -l
396Another factor is Github. It could be that a lot of the new software for Linux is now hosted on Github, Bitbucket, and other DVCS-friendly sites. Meanwhile, as you say, the more stable stuff on Sourceforge is likely to be handled by distro-specific repositories.
restated:
I'd like to see the statistics comparing github, gitorious, bitbucket, google code, heck, even codeplex. SourceForge is no longer the only goto for compiling from source, either.
I'd like to see the statistics comparing github, gitorious, bitbucket, google code, heck, even codeplex. SourceForge is no longer the only goto for compiling from source, either.
I can’t remember the last time I found a project hosted on SourceForge. Actually, I can, it was http://webcam-osx.sourceforge.net/ about 4 years ago. I assumed everyone had moved en masse to Github?
Not everyone likes Git, and SF offers other niceties like forums and mailing lists.
Yes, and those that want those things tend to end up on google code nowadays - not at SF.
link spam...?
What is exactly the purpose of the links here?
Are you using these open source projects yourself?
Filezilla is my favorite FTP program.
Filezilla is my favorite FTP program.
These are all popular open source projects that are still hosted on Source Forge posted in response to the parent.
That said, the list of category leading software on SF that people still care about is dwindling.
That said, the list of category leading software on SF that people still care about is dwindling.
VLC is by far the most popular project on Sourceforge. Almost pushing it to be become all time #1
I think they need to work on their data collection. The unknown "Other" is almost as large as the other OS categories combined. This makes it hard to draw any conclusions.
The reasons why the number of sourceforge visitors with Linux is declining might also include GitHub, which became hugely popular in this crowd.
They seem to have counted downloads, rather than site visitors.
The decline in Sourceforge downloads by Linux users is likely to be down to the fact that most will simply grab the package from their distro's repository, rather than getting it from SF. If I download, say, FileZilla on my Windows machine, I get it via Sourceforge. On my Ubuntu box, it's in the repo.
The decline in Sourceforge downloads by Linux users is likely to be down to the fact that most will simply grab the package from their distro's repository, rather than getting it from SF. If I download, say, FileZilla on my Windows machine, I get it via Sourceforge. On my Ubuntu box, it's in the repo.
Yeah that's how I get almost all the software for my GNU/Linux boxen, all from repositories. And if I'm hacking on something just pull it out from Git or BZR or SVN or similar. Many projects also left SF since they started with changes that made it a bit of pain to use.
Actually what was counted was the OS of the people who downloaded software projects.
This article is an example of how not to visualize data. The charts are not helpful in any way.
God, yes. It frustrated me so much that I ended up just copying the data into JS arrays and generating my own charts using the Google Visualization API.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25782/sourceforge.html
Pretty eye-opening. What's clear is that the 'Other' category brings so much uncertainty to the data that it renders the data virtually useless.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25782/sourceforge.html
Pretty eye-opening. What's clear is that the 'Other' category brings so much uncertainty to the data that it renders the data virtually useless.
I found stacked area to work really well:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6353242/hn/sourceforge-area-normaliz...
You can get a real sense for how large the 'other' datapoint is by looking at non-normalized view as well:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6353242/hn/sourceforge-area.html
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6353242/hn/sourceforge-area-normaliz...
You can get a real sense for how large the 'other' datapoint is by looking at non-normalized view as well:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6353242/hn/sourceforge-area.html
Apparently much of the "other" data are non-browser tools. E.g., curl and wget.
https://twitter.com/#!/rbowen/status/137305778875936771
https://twitter.com/#!/rbowen/status/137305778875936771
Follow up conversation at: http://www.bradlanders.com/2011/11/17/visualizing-sourceforg...
That's an awesome chart to visualize
Indeed. A single chart with time on the horizontal axis, downloads on the vertical axis, and one line per operating system would have been far more comprehensible.
Instead we get time inverted, bar graphs, and no way to visually compare the operating systems.
Instead we get time inverted, bar graphs, and no way to visually compare the operating systems.
It also isn't very good to have an "other" category of ~60M averaged when your three "main" are ~60M, ~4M and ~3M.
Terrible article.
Terrible article.
Apparently, the unknown represent the auto updates right through the application itself, but sourced from SF
https://twitter.com/#!/rbowen/status/137305778875936771
https://twitter.com/#!/rbowen/status/137305778875936771
Rather.
It took me a while to figure out the dates were MM/DD/YY. Even then, why is the day included? Are these per-day, and if so, why are they making sweeping generalisations about all of April? If they're just point markers why aren't they in line, and why are the bars separated?
It's great they managed to provide the full stats - in a completely uncopyable format. Let me break out tessaract. http://i.imgur.com/VDtUp.png http://i.imgur.com/nuKxl.png for (only marginally) more helpful visualisations
EDIT: warpdude's ones four hours ago and two comments down look nicer
It took me a while to figure out the dates were MM/DD/YY. Even then, why is the day included? Are these per-day, and if so, why are they making sweeping generalisations about all of April? If they're just point markers why aren't they in line, and why are the bars separated?
It's great they managed to provide the full stats - in a completely uncopyable format. Let me break out tessaract. http://i.imgur.com/VDtUp.png http://i.imgur.com/nuKxl.png for (only marginally) more helpful visualisations
EDIT: warpdude's ones four hours ago and two comments down look nicer
Ubuntu and Launchpad PPA? Github? This article is pretty much pointless and the visualizations are horrible.
Please note how the "other" category consists of nearly half of the downloads. I would say that this adds a lot of uncertainity in this dataset. Without knowing the distribution of the OS-es that shows up in "other" this data is pretty much meaningless.
Good to see data ming on this... it's been obvious in my work circles through 2011 so far. "Real stuff" is getting done on Mac OS, not just visual and content.
What's with the table as a picture?
That was not a good article at all. The title is misleading and the content has little to nothing to do with "OS Wars". We all know the users are benefitting from the 3 big competing OSes. Then they go on to basically say "hey, look at us, we're still relevant! We have some Analytics data that you should read as coming from a major authority".
I have nothing against SF at all but this kind of sounded like a call for attention. They talk about this data like its the final word on the subject but leave out so many other really popular resources where people get their apps like App Stores, Package Managers, GitHub, etc.
And what OS wars? This is 2011 not 1997. The OS makers are competing but they're not trying to be all things to all people like in the old days. We've got Linux distros for all types of users from sys admins (Arch, CentOS) to casual users (Ubuntu and other Debian based distros). The Mac has its own uniqueness that appeals to a broad audience and some people want their old standard, Windows. Some are gaining ground, others losing, but it's not like 10 or 15 years ago where people were looking for a winner. Some people are still and I'd say that's kind of dumb and jingoism has a bit to do with that.
This article should have had the title "SourceForge Sees Major Increase in Downloads from NameofOS". I call link bait.
I have nothing against SF at all but this kind of sounded like a call for attention. They talk about this data like its the final word on the subject but leave out so many other really popular resources where people get their apps like App Stores, Package Managers, GitHub, etc.
And what OS wars? This is 2011 not 1997. The OS makers are competing but they're not trying to be all things to all people like in the old days. We've got Linux distros for all types of users from sys admins (Arch, CentOS) to casual users (Ubuntu and other Debian based distros). The Mac has its own uniqueness that appeals to a broad audience and some people want their old standard, Windows. Some are gaining ground, others losing, but it's not like 10 or 15 years ago where people were looking for a winner. Some people are still and I'd say that's kind of dumb and jingoism has a bit to do with that.
This article should have had the title "SourceForge Sees Major Increase in Downloads from NameofOS". I call link bait.
Unsurprisingly, Windows dominates with more downloads than all others combined.
As mentioned in lots of other comments, Linux users go to their package manager -- an App Store that runs 100% off promotions 24/7.
Mac users have an App Store now.
Windows users are still using SourceForge.
Mac users have an App Store now.
Windows users are still using SourceForge.
Actually, I expect that Mac users are overrepresented: every time you go "brew install blah" there's a good chance you're downloading off of SourceForge.
Surprisingly,
since 11/1/10, windows has less downloads than all others combined.
Since 3/1/11, windows + mac + linux have less downloads than other alone.
The difference between the OS distribution on SourceForge and the OS distribution in the real world only shows how irrelevant SourceForge has made itself.
Oof, those charts could be a lot better. Someone get Horace Dediu in here.
OS X is a backwater as far as binary distribution is concerned and so developers have to use brew or macports. Every time you do "brew install blah" you have a 1/3 chance of downloading a project from source forge.