Why I Chose Posterous: a Quick Review(jsuth.com)
jsuth.com
Why I Chose Posterous: a Quick Review
http://www.jsuth.com/why-i-chose-posterous-a-quick
18 comments
Very true, but they've only been at it for 3 months and have come a long way since their launch.
I'm not going to lie, when they first launched I didn't understand what really differentiated them from everyone else. What ended up selling me on posterous is the fact that my Mom has a posterous. To say she's not a computer person is an understatement. My Mom is the person that very recently used to go to yahoo.com, type google, click on the google.com search result and then search for X.
At first I thought it was because I emailed it to her and she was just trying to appease me. But then I went through my emails of other stuff I sent her: Firefox, Ad-aware, Delicious, Google Toolbar, etc. Each of these was sent to her after she complained to me about a problem (IE is crashing, computer is slow [spyware/adware], accessing bookmarks on other computers, easy access to Google [surprise!]).
Despite this, she has to yet to adapt and use any of the above applications (ignoring her son's helpful advice :-D). However, when she wanted a way to easily post pictures and I suggested posterous, she started using it. I'm not going to pretend I know why, but something clicked.
I'm not going to lie, when they first launched I didn't understand what really differentiated them from everyone else. What ended up selling me on posterous is the fact that my Mom has a posterous. To say she's not a computer person is an understatement. My Mom is the person that very recently used to go to yahoo.com, type google, click on the google.com search result and then search for X.
At first I thought it was because I emailed it to her and she was just trying to appease me. But then I went through my emails of other stuff I sent her: Firefox, Ad-aware, Delicious, Google Toolbar, etc. Each of these was sent to her after she complained to me about a problem (IE is crashing, computer is slow [spyware/adware], accessing bookmarks on other computers, easy access to Google [surprise!]).
Despite this, she has to yet to adapt and use any of the above applications (ignoring her son's helpful advice :-D). However, when she wanted a way to easily post pictures and I suggested posterous, she started using it. I'm not going to pretend I know why, but something clicked.
None taken -- we know there's a road ahead, but we're psyched and ready to take on the challenge.
By the way, I think that the unwavering optimism of you guys is incredibly inspiring. Every time I've talked with you (I emailed a few criticisms a while back), I get nothing but incredible enthusiasm. I think I started out with a pretty negative reaction towards Posterous, because I'm a Tumblr addict, but now I'm rooting for you guys 100%. Keep it up!
"... Posterous has designed a blogging platform where the entire focus is on email. Your email client is the admin interface. For those of us that have an email client open all day, posterous seamlessly inserts blogging into the day's natural workflow. ..."
No I disagree with that one.
Maybe my workflow is a bit different but I've found the posting of blogs, images, short messages etc using a purposeful designed interface works better. The bit that doesn't work is joining them together. Flickr, twitter, blogger, wordpress allow you to do one task well. Replacing this process by email is a bottleneck because email clients (in my case 'Evolution') are horrendous things to use as a multi-purpose tool. There is no one way to map what you want to achieve to each service. For example:
- add a blog entry: include title a couple of pages of text with images and some urls (worked)
- twitter entry: quick message to a person with a longish url (text length > 140char, failed and url chopped
- flickr entry: tags + description + title + image (title failed, no tags allowed, no licensing of original images allowed)
I've tried these combinations and had success with the blog, moderate success with the twitter and bit of a failure with the flickr entry. I don't think the idea behind Posterous is bad. It's just the tools I have at my disposal are so clumsy. So the idea of an email interface while it works for me has a lot of rough edges and built-in frustration. Where Posterous does work well is integrating the bits you post, not perfectly but enough to be useful.
No I disagree with that one.
Maybe my workflow is a bit different but I've found the posting of blogs, images, short messages etc using a purposeful designed interface works better. The bit that doesn't work is joining them together. Flickr, twitter, blogger, wordpress allow you to do one task well. Replacing this process by email is a bottleneck because email clients (in my case 'Evolution') are horrendous things to use as a multi-purpose tool. There is no one way to map what you want to achieve to each service. For example:
- add a blog entry: include title a couple of pages of text with images and some urls (worked)
- twitter entry: quick message to a person with a longish url (text length > 140char, failed and url chopped
- flickr entry: tags + description + title + image (title failed, no tags allowed, no licensing of original images allowed)
I've tried these combinations and had success with the blog, moderate success with the twitter and bit of a failure with the flickr entry. I don't think the idea behind Posterous is bad. It's just the tools I have at my disposal are so clumsy. So the idea of an email interface while it works for me has a lot of rough edges and built-in frustration. Where Posterous does work well is integrating the bits you post, not perfectly but enough to be useful.
That would be an interesting challenge: seeing if you could create a single interface that did all that WELL. As in, figuring out how to interpret a plaintext input and sort it out into categories.
"... seeing if you could create a single interface that did all that WELL ..."
Funny enough I've worked on this for a while and while it's a good idea the effort required is somewhat less than using existing application GUI's to enter data and extract data via feeds or API's. The idea I tried was creating an interface to update multiple services (twitter, flickr, delicious ...) via one page, send to a database and use the api's to auto-update. The hard bits ...
- how do you add more services easily?
- how will your display code handle lots of empty fields? Lots of conditionals in your templates. Is your templating engine up to it?
- how do you selectively and easily send data to one application but not another, some times? Can you change for instance sending links to flickr but not to delicious on a one time basis?
- how do you handle sites that have no API's or feeds? Like hackernews which had neither for a long time.
The one key advantage of this method is you capture data before you propagate it. So if your well thought out 100 word post (with references) dies because your browser crashes or you press the back button you have a local copy.
Funny enough I've worked on this for a while and while it's a good idea the effort required is somewhat less than using existing application GUI's to enter data and extract data via feeds or API's. The idea I tried was creating an interface to update multiple services (twitter, flickr, delicious ...) via one page, send to a database and use the api's to auto-update. The hard bits ...
- how do you add more services easily?
- how will your display code handle lots of empty fields? Lots of conditionals in your templates. Is your templating engine up to it?
- how do you selectively and easily send data to one application but not another, some times? Can you change for instance sending links to flickr but not to delicious on a one time basis?
- how do you handle sites that have no API's or feeds? Like hackernews which had neither for a long time.
The one key advantage of this method is you capture data before you propagate it. So if your well thought out 100 word post (with references) dies because your browser crashes or you press the back button you have a local copy.
I believe you can do almost all the things mentioned in the entry with Tumblr's email feature (flash-encoding is through Vimeo).
http://www.tumblr.com/goodies
http://www.tumblr.com/vimeo
http://www.tumblr.com/goodies
http://www.tumblr.com/vimeo
I always feel like there's an anti-Tumblr vibe on HN, and I've never understood why. And I seem to recall Marco (one of the lead designers of Tumblr) - making a jab at Paul Graham at some point - though I might be making that latter bit up, since Marco jabs at a lot of people, which is why his blog is such a fun read.
Is there some enmity between the two sets of developers? Is it a Boston-versus-NY thing?
Is there some enmity between the two sets of developers? Is it a Boston-versus-NY thing?
I love posterous too, I think they have really made it easy for people like me to post who are having interesting contents in their emails but never get time to update their blogs. Now I can just forward the email I am done. Later on when I can visit through my posts.
I'm now using posterous, although I have a in-stasis tumblr. Has anyone spotted a good comparison between the two?
I like the intuitive autopost-to-twitter, works well for me.
I like the intuitive autopost-to-twitter, works well for me.
Marco had one that was pretty scathing back a little while ago. But I'm guessing he's considered to have some bias.
link :)?
http://tumblelog.marco.org/40558829/sad-trombone-beats-tumbl...
It's more anti Techcrunch than it is anti-Posterous, though.
It's more anti Techcrunch than it is anti-Posterous, though.
No offense to Posterous staff, but I think they have a lot of work to do before it can really claim that title. I think WordPress currently holds that title.