Of Gravatars and Robohashes(codingthewheel.com)
codingthewheel.com
Of Gravatars and Robohashes
http://www.codingthewheel.com/internet/of-gravatars-and-robohashes
5 comments
Gravatar uses hashes for privacy so the email addresses themselves do not have to be transmitted.
To maintain email privacy, you could use a straight pass-through when using Gravatar. In this case, your URL could look like:
http://robohash.org/620050a4db5104bae758cd75171d64ca?gravata...
To maintain email privacy, you could use a straight pass-through when using Gravatar. In this case, your URL could look like:
http://robohash.org/620050a4db5104bae758cd75171d64ca?gravata...
Good idea!
I've added this.
Try - http://robohash.org/620050a4db5104bae758cd75171d64ca?gravata...
I've added this.
Try - http://robohash.org/620050a4db5104bae758cd75171d64ca?gravata...
Nice work, but the "they look like they were drawn by programmers" comment makes me think you missed the point of Gravatar's specific default avatars.
They're intentionally ugly. The theory is that an ugly default avatar makes the user more likely to upload their own image.
They're intentionally ugly. The theory is that an ugly default avatar makes the user more likely to upload their own image.
Interesting point. Wavatars are Shamus Young's original work.[1] Identicons[2] and monsterids[3] are Scott Sherill-Mix's work. I don't think those guys were shooting for "ugly", but I agree an ugly or nondescript avatar could incentivize users to upload a custom one. And that may have played into Gravatar's decision to support these avatar types.
[1] http://www.shamusyoung.com/twentysidedtale/?p=1462
[2] http://scott.sherrillmix.com/blog/blogger/wp_identicon/
[3] http://scott.sherrillmix.com/blog/blogger/wp_monsterid/
[1] http://www.shamusyoung.com/twentysidedtale/?p=1462
[2] http://scott.sherrillmix.com/blog/blogger/wp_identicon/
[3] http://scott.sherrillmix.com/blog/blogger/wp_monsterid/
Minor correction: Identicons were created by Don Park who open sourced a Java implementation. Scott adapted it for WordPress and gives credit to Don credit for the idea in your link[2]:
"A couple weeks ago I made a WordPress plugin to generate unique monsters for each commenter. Don Park came up with the original idea for representing users with geometric shapes. Since I already had the framework in place I thought I’d make a WordPress plugin for the original geometric Identicons."
"A couple weeks ago I made a WordPress plugin to generate unique monsters for each commenter. Don Park came up with the original idea for representing users with geometric shapes. Since I already had the framework in place I thought I’d make a WordPress plugin for the original geometric Identicons."
yikes, Gravatar has an open redirect.
http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/8ca7425c8ada807b9bf6934f10d59...
It's a fun trick, but it should't be possible.
http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/8ca7425c8ada807b9bf6934f10d59...
It's a fun trick, but it should't be possible.
Gravatar is designed that way so you can use any default image.
The technique is described in the Gravatar docs under "Default Image."
http://en.gravatar.com/site/implement/images/
The technique is described in the Gravatar docs under "Default Image."
http://en.gravatar.com/site/implement/images/
Ah. But I'd expect think that they'd limit it to only images, or do some sorta safety checking. I recognize the performance concerns, but it's too easy to add a malware redirect onto their trusted url.
Very nice, I was planning to implement a similar thing with for 'anonymous' ip-based human readable usernames to identify users without forcing them to create profiles.
An excellent bonus - my robohash looks exactly like Bender from Futurama :^)
An excellent bonus - my robohash looks exactly like Bender from Futurama :^)
How will you handle thousands of users behind a corporate firewall?
I'm curious how many variations robohash uses. It seems either you've got a very wide variety of custom graphics elements, or only a few elements and have to draw a very wide number of images to fit in them.
Each two digits of hex is 255, and I count 16 pairs, but can think of only 8 elements in the photos (eyes, ears, nose, mouth, head, body, arms, background).
If it's those 8 elements and they're derived from four digits in the hash, then you need 65,535 or so different ears.
I'm guessing the solution to this is to reduce the hash further... so you get more repetition where two texts produce the same robot, but apparently they've not made it too bad.
How far did robohash reduce it? Or how far should one reduce it? How many images does a robohash art set have?
Each two digits of hex is 255, and I count 16 pairs, but can think of only 8 elements in the photos (eyes, ears, nose, mouth, head, body, arms, background).
If it's those 8 elements and they're derived from four digits in the hash, then you need 65,535 or so different ears.
I'm guessing the solution to this is to reduce the hash further... so you get more repetition where two texts produce the same robot, but apparently they've not made it too bad.
How far did robohash reduce it? Or how far should one reduce it? How many images does a robohash art set have?
It depends on which set you use.
There are three sets-
The default set has 10 base colors, 10 base faces, 10 Bodies, 10 Eyes, 10 Accessories, 10 Mouths.
There are then 2 sets of 10 backgrounds.
So 3(10^6)(210) ~= 60,000,000
There are three sets-
The default set has 10 base colors, 10 base faces, 10 Bodies, 10 Eyes, 10 Accessories, 10 Mouths.
There are then 2 sets of 10 backgrounds.
So 3(10^6)(210) ~= 60,000,000
I didn't realize that this was a use-case anyone was interested in, but it sort of makes sense. I've added a parameter you can pass to RH.org to deal with the gravatar pull on my side, so you don't have to.
This adds a bit of serverload, since I need to make a bunch of requests, but it's not THAT bad.
http://robohash.org/[email protected]?gravatar=yes
If you pass gravatar=yes, it will make a pull to the gravatar URL for that address. If something exists there that isn't the default, it will issue a 301 over to the site.
Otherwise, it will return the robohash you requested. It also passes the size param over to Gravatar, just to be nice ;)