Show HN: Booste – a cloud-hosted desktop for developers(devs.booste.io)
devs.booste.io
Show HN: Booste – a cloud-hosted desktop for developers
http://www.devs.booste.io/
19 comments
You're being too harsh. Yes his price is probably a bit high for the average user, but it is probably this way either because he's passing on his small scale cost or he made up some numbers.
I use Google's web based IDE to write code (at work), and it is a game changer. I can pick up where I left off from any device (that's not a phone). I used to be a die hard intellij fan, but now I never use it.
Why? Because it's not in the cloud.
I use Google's web based IDE to write code (at work), and it is a game changer. I can pick up where I left off from any device (that's not a phone). I used to be a die hard intellij fan, but now I never use it.
Why? Because it's not in the cloud.
Thanks for the kind support, mkoryak.
Pricing could reasonably drop to $15/monthly for the unlimited plan, once I reach scale. The current system is not at all cost optimized; each user is a significant cost to me. Economies of scale and cloud-side tech has not been built out, because Booste is pre-product-market-fit and simply assessing interest.
The web-based-IDE "Game Changer" is very interesting, and a direction I've considered. Flexible and customizable compute backend. Would be curious to learn which IDE you're using.
Pricing could reasonably drop to $15/monthly for the unlimited plan, once I reach scale. The current system is not at all cost optimized; each user is a significant cost to me. Economies of scale and cloud-side tech has not been built out, because Booste is pre-product-market-fit and simply assessing interest.
The web-based-IDE "Game Changer" is very interesting, and a direction I've considered. Flexible and customizable compute backend. Would be curious to learn which IDE you're using.
What's this web based IDE called? Can you drop a link to it please?
I assume he means https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/introducing-googl...
but there are a plethora of online IDE's that can integrate well with GCP.
I miss Bespin, it later became skywriter, and was eventually integrated into the ACE online editor. For the few times I needed to edit something on the go, and didn't have my laptop, it worked wonderfully. I was not a big fan of the direction it took, moving away from what I would consider a fully opensource platform, to a paid one, but it does its job, and it does it well.
GCP cloud editor uses Eclipse Orion. I am excited to see the expansion of the project, and the direction it takes. Cloud IDE's have always been badass.
but there are a plethora of online IDE's that can integrate well with GCP.
I miss Bespin, it later became skywriter, and was eventually integrated into the ACE online editor. For the few times I needed to edit something on the go, and didn't have my laptop, it worked wonderfully. I was not a big fan of the direction it took, moving away from what I would consider a fully opensource platform, to a paid one, but it does its job, and it does it well.
GCP cloud editor uses Eclipse Orion. I am excited to see the expansion of the project, and the direction it takes. Cloud IDE's have always been badass.
- I agree, it sucks
- A friend just had to use similar BS when he started at another company and I am already excited about all the funny stories he'll tell me
- We can already minimize resource consumption by using apps and OSes which are more efficient. While Win10 is total crap for example, a laptop from 2005 still works as a decent Dev-machine with Linux on it (it basically costs <200$ and you can upgrade it to some degree)
When I read about these ideas I imagine people sitting in front of their 2000$ Apple-MBP's just to connect to some AWS-shit that costs even more just "to be able to work" - it's kind of funny but also stupid.
- A friend just had to use similar BS when he started at another company and I am already excited about all the funny stories he'll tell me
- We can already minimize resource consumption by using apps and OSes which are more efficient. While Win10 is total crap for example, a laptop from 2005 still works as a decent Dev-machine with Linux on it (it basically costs <200$ and you can upgrade it to some degree)
When I read about these ideas I imagine people sitting in front of their 2000$ Apple-MBP's just to connect to some AWS-shit that costs even more just "to be able to work" - it's kind of funny but also stupid.
This direct critique is actually very appreciated. From this I've learned that the website and HN post need to better back up the claims made and paint some clarity as to what is happening in the system.
The intent is not to sell snake oil. I have a free version available for users to assess the product themselves and make that decision. If you personally got into the system, launched a desktop, and were unsatisfied, please email me at [email protected] or call me on my personal cell (331) 262-8169.
The intent is not to sell snake oil. I have a free version available for users to assess the product themselves and make that decision. If you personally got into the system, launched a desktop, and were unsatisfied, please email me at [email protected] or call me on my personal cell (331) 262-8169.
It's been brought to my attention that the website and HN post was misleading regarding the "from any device" claim.
Booste currently only runs on Windows machines, and runs Windows apps. I have updated the plans page to more clearly reflect this.
I am actively developing this for other device platforms, starting with Mac and Linux on the device side, and Linux environments on the cloud side.
I'm the sole developer of this product and wrote the first line of code only three months ago. I appreciate your patience. My intent is not to mislead - it is to paint the vision.
Booste currently only runs on Windows machines, and runs Windows apps. I have updated the plans page to more clearly reflect this.
I am actively developing this for other device platforms, starting with Mac and Linux on the device side, and Linux environments on the cloud side.
I'm the sole developer of this product and wrote the first line of code only three months ago. I appreciate your patience. My intent is not to mislead - it is to paint the vision.
Running a development environment from an iPad would really catch my interest. It's something I've already done in the past using Emacs over Blink (a Mosh terminal for iOS), but the experience was not ideal.
I'd need to be able to open multiple terminals and install semi-random programs though. It's not clear to me if that's fits in with your vision.
I'd need to be able to open multiple terminals and install semi-random programs though. It's not clear to me if that's fits in with your vision.
You can serve VS Code up with a web server and use it with anything that has a browser.
Do you have any info on how to do this?
LinuxServer.io has a Docker image that I use.
Super helpful here, thanks for pointing me toward this!
I have been running Cloud Shell on the google cloud console app on iOS. Only your home folder persists but you can set up a custom cloud shell environment with docker to add your favorite tools.
Its pretty good for coding on the go (with vim) but for multiple terminals you might be better off using screen or tmux. I can even deploy on the command line because of gcloud and gsutil cli toolchains.
Its pretty good for coding on the go (with vim) but for multiple terminals you might be better off using screen or tmux. I can even deploy on the command line because of gcloud and gsutil cli toolchains.
I use amazon workspaces and the iOS app works just fine for me. Behaves as a desktop would afaik
I'm certainly flexible to work with the use cases I see.
Your Emacs workflow is one I'd happily replace with a proper GUI (VSCode, etc).
The current iteration is quite literally a full remote desktop, onto which you can install any semi-random program you'd like. In fact, there's even a "Barebones Windows" desktop available, with no installs, for you to flesh out as you please. Multiple terminals are totally cool too!
That said, the long-term vision is to make the apps you use seem local, so there's no context-switching. I'd like Booste to just be a wrapper around the app - if I could eliminate the desktop on the server end and simply capture the application window, that'd be the most seamless experience for users who are not used to context-switching into remote desktops.
Your Emacs workflow is one I'd happily replace with a proper GUI (VSCode, etc).
The current iteration is quite literally a full remote desktop, onto which you can install any semi-random program you'd like. In fact, there's even a "Barebones Windows" desktop available, with no installs, for you to flesh out as you please. Multiple terminals are totally cool too!
That said, the long-term vision is to make the apps you use seem local, so there's no context-switching. I'd like Booste to just be a wrapper around the app - if I could eliminate the desktop on the server end and simply capture the application window, that'd be the most seamless experience for users who are not used to context-switching into remote desktops.
Hey HN!
First-time poster here, excited to show you what I've been working on. I'm a recent mechanical engineering grad and self-taught developer. I thought it was a pain in the ass (can we swear on HN?) to walk to a campus computer lab whenever I needed to do 3D CAD or run intensive simulations or code scripts. My less-than-powerful laptop became preventative in my work.
I built a simple-to-use remote desktop system, with popular engineering apps pre-installed, hosted in the cloud. Now, I'm able to run CAD (Autodesk Fusion 360) and development tools (Android Studio) from a $200 device. I think it's silly that the up-front cost of a workstation can prevent software and mechanical engineers from doing their work.
I threw together a free version for your feedback, and I hope to hear your opinions! I'm interviewing for YC W20, so your honest thoughts (and potential usership) would be fantastic.
Cheers! Erik
First-time poster here, excited to show you what I've been working on. I'm a recent mechanical engineering grad and self-taught developer. I thought it was a pain in the ass (can we swear on HN?) to walk to a campus computer lab whenever I needed to do 3D CAD or run intensive simulations or code scripts. My less-than-powerful laptop became preventative in my work.
I built a simple-to-use remote desktop system, with popular engineering apps pre-installed, hosted in the cloud. Now, I'm able to run CAD (Autodesk Fusion 360) and development tools (Android Studio) from a $200 device. I think it's silly that the up-front cost of a workstation can prevent software and mechanical engineers from doing their work.
I threw together a free version for your feedback, and I hope to hear your opinions! I'm interviewing for YC W20, so your honest thoughts (and potential usership) would be fantastic.
Cheers! Erik
Are you posting user credentials to a free form tool that then emails them to you in cleartext?
https://imgur.com/a/dzF5Kq9
https://imgur.com/a/p3umOwS
https://imgur.com/a/dzF5Kq9
https://imgur.com/a/p3umOwS
This is admittedly correct. The tool sends (edit: sent) to an API that processes your credentials into the user database.
I had not expected submissions to surge as much as they have, and had not built proper encryption into the user signup flow.
I recognize the issues here and am glad you called them out. To respond: 1) I've changed the web form to gather emails as a waitlist until I properly handle new user submissions. 2) I'll develop acceptable user account creation. 3) I'll give current users the ability or change their credentials under the proper system.
My truest apologies for this oversight, and thank you.
I had not expected submissions to surge as much as they have, and had not built proper encryption into the user signup flow.
I recognize the issues here and am glad you called them out. To respond: 1) I've changed the web form to gather emails as a waitlist until I properly handle new user submissions. 2) I'll develop acceptable user account creation. 3) I'll give current users the ability or change their credentials under the proper system.
My truest apologies for this oversight, and thank you.
What you've done here is absolutely fucking insane and I will never ever trust you and your project and I hope noone else does either. I'm sorry but this is utterly inacceptable. The fact that you need this to be called out is horrifying and your apology is insufficient.
What tech is the remote desktop based on? VNC?
Quite curious about how you keep the latency low enough that it to type in an editor.
Quite curious about how you keep the latency low enough that it to type in an editor.
I actually have not engineered the streaming portion, so latency is the same as current VNC and RDP protocols.
To get the product together as fast as possible (first line of code written three months ago), I actually did not reengineer the remote desktop protocol. In fact, the current product simply gives you the IP and password info to plug into your Windows Remote Desktop client app.
Future plans are to integrate RDP into the Booste app, to make the experience seem more native.
After that, I'll be implementing the modern H.265 protocol used by videogame streaming companies such as Vectordash and Nvidia GeForce Now.
To get the product together as fast as possible (first line of code written three months ago), I actually did not reengineer the remote desktop protocol. In fact, the current product simply gives you the IP and password info to plug into your Windows Remote Desktop client app.
Future plans are to integrate RDP into the Booste app, to make the experience seem more native.
After that, I'll be implementing the modern H.265 protocol used by videogame streaming companies such as Vectordash and Nvidia GeForce Now.
> I'll be implementing the modern H.265 protocol used by videogame streaming companies
Are you sure that's the right solution?
Remote desktop is able to render sharp fonts because its sending a lot of desktop contextual information over the wire, as opposed to just doing a dump "capture the screen, encode it, and send" like the videogame streaming systems do.
In a videogame, you can get away with small fringes on things (compression artifacts) but it would be quite jarring in your text editor.
I've actually ran into this with the NX protocol (NoMachine) before, and it's one of the main reasons I went away from it.
Are you sure that's the right solution?
Remote desktop is able to render sharp fonts because its sending a lot of desktop contextual information over the wire, as opposed to just doing a dump "capture the screen, encode it, and send" like the videogame streaming systems do.
In a videogame, you can get away with small fringes on things (compression artifacts) but it would be quite jarring in your text editor.
I've actually ran into this with the NX protocol (NoMachine) before, and it's one of the main reasons I went away from it.
Cool insight here that I was unaware of. I'm still assessing solutions.
It really all depends on which use cases I end up focusing on. The initial idea was for 3D design (IE Solidworks), in which case the H.265 protocol would handle the more graphical, non text-based, visuals. This HN launch was to test out the developer markets, and it seems to resonate enough where I'd consider a way to transmit and render text as text rather than a screen capture.
It really all depends on which use cases I end up focusing on. The initial idea was for 3D design (IE Solidworks), in which case the H.265 protocol would handle the more graphical, non text-based, visuals. This HN launch was to test out the developer markets, and it seems to resonate enough where I'd consider a way to transmit and render text as text rather than a screen capture.
I agree with this, and it's exactly the reason why RDP is a vastly better experience than VNC.
Using VNC on a LAN isn't great, but over WAN it's a truely miserable experience.
Using VNC on a LAN isn't great, but over WAN it's a truely miserable experience.
Apparently Citrix according to another comment.
I thought it might have been https://www.spice-space.org/ which is GPL2.
Amazon workspaces seems to use RDP
I thought it might have been https://www.spice-space.org/ which is GPL2.
Amazon workspaces seems to use RDP
Workspaces uses PCoIP AFAIK
I wish mobile OSs had an implementation of this or similar.
I encourage users to use their Windows RDP client for this version.
Windows Remote Desktop has been usable or at least not completely unacceptable in the past. VNC though I've never seen it be acceptable for CAD so I'm curious too.
Windows Remote Desktop is the current tech in Booste, and is useable but not necessarily pleasant, I admit.
Engineering priority #2, following multi-device-support, is to tackle the streaming challenge.
I'm trying my best, as a solo founder, to not build out features until they're requested, so consider "Faster Streaming" to be requested!
Engineering priority #2, following multi-device-support, is to tackle the streaming challenge.
I'm trying my best, as a solo founder, to not build out features until they're requested, so consider "Faster Streaming" to be requested!
You mentioned somewhere that you are using user-dedicated AWS VMs, but I don't see any mention of what size of instance you are getting? Does it vary depending on the Intermediate/Unlimited plan?
Free plan has the same instance sizing as the other two plans.
If you're technically interested, I serve up a 2xl sized instance, tethered to a medium GPU, regardless of the app used. It's costly to me, so in the future, I'll be finding ways to dynamically size vCPU and vGPU based on workload.
If you're technically interested, I serve up a 2xl sized instance, tethered to a medium GPU, regardless of the app used. It's costly to me, so in the future, I'll be finding ways to dynamically size vCPU and vGPU based on workload.
> 2xl
Wow, those are pretty expensive; I'd assumed it would be a medium or large instance!
Hmm, not sure which series of 2xlarge instance you mean, but even with the cheapest that supports Elastic Graphics, doesn't that mean that a user on the Unlimited plan could cost you over $300/month, while you charge them $60/month?
Maybe I'm calculating something wrongly here?
Also, on the Intermediate plan it says "App Sessions Capped At 6 Hours" - what exactly does that mean though? Does it mean I can use it at most 6 hours in a day, or does it mean I get cut off every 6 hours but can immediately reconnect if I want to?
Wow, those are pretty expensive; I'd assumed it would be a medium or large instance!
Hmm, not sure which series of 2xlarge instance you mean, but even with the cheapest that supports Elastic Graphics, doesn't that mean that a user on the Unlimited plan could cost you over $300/month, while you charge them $60/month?
Maybe I'm calculating something wrongly here?
Also, on the Intermediate plan it says "App Sessions Capped At 6 Hours" - what exactly does that mean though? Does it mean I can use it at most 6 hours in a day, or does it mean I get cut off every 6 hours but can immediately reconnect if I want to?
Pricing: my calculations are currently at $30/month per user, at 8hr/day usage with this instance sizing. I'll double-check the sources I used to get pricing.
Medium instances would be appropriate for IDE use cases. I upped to 2xl to handle 3D design tools, but with the recent interest out of the developer community, I can readjust myself downward from 2xl to medium or large.
You get cut off every 6 hours (instance spins down automatically based on your plan). Immediately, you can spin it back up and reconnect for another 6 hrs. The same applies to the free tier, at a 1 hr cap.
Medium instances would be appropriate for IDE use cases. I upped to 2xl to handle 3D design tools, but with the recent interest out of the developer community, I can readjust myself downward from 2xl to medium or large.
You get cut off every 6 hours (instance spins down automatically based on your plan). Immediately, you can spin it back up and reconnect for another 6 hrs. The same applies to the free tier, at a 1 hr cap.
Unless you have a license to provide Adobe, Autodesk, and Microsoft apps over the cloud in this way, you should take this down immediately. They have lots of lawyers.
Thanks for the warning!
All apps currently offered are free licenses, with the exception of the Adobe suite and Autodesk Fusion. For those, you follow a workflow as if you were doing it on your own device.
For Adobe, you're prompted to enter your personal license info (Bring Your Own License). Adobe limits your usage to a certain quantity of devices per license, and it recognizes the app in the Booste cloud as a uniqe device, prompting you to log out of your other devices if you've reached capacity.
For Autodesk, I actually just provide the download link for the software, leading you through the process to properly do the download and license compliance yourself as if you were a traditional desktop user.
I understand that this answer may not be enough, and will be diving deeper into the implications. Thank you.
All apps currently offered are free licenses, with the exception of the Adobe suite and Autodesk Fusion. For those, you follow a workflow as if you were doing it on your own device.
For Adobe, you're prompted to enter your personal license info (Bring Your Own License). Adobe limits your usage to a certain quantity of devices per license, and it recognizes the app in the Booste cloud as a uniqe device, prompting you to log out of your other devices if you've reached capacity.
For Autodesk, I actually just provide the download link for the software, leading you through the process to properly do the download and license compliance yourself as if you were a traditional desktop user.
I understand that this answer may not be enough, and will be diving deeper into the implications. Thank you.
Microsoft probably won’t notice for now but just be careful: the licensing for Windows 10 requires a very specific kind of license that’s fairly pricey per user. You can’t just use a normal end-user / student one. As a result, the economics are really tough.
This idea was actually the first idea for Mighty before I pivoted a few months ago.
macOS can only be run on Apple hardware btw. That also makes the cost structure for this kind of business complex.
Good luck!
This idea was actually the first idea for Mighty before I pivoted a few months ago.
macOS can only be run on Apple hardware btw. That also makes the cost structure for this kind of business complex.
Good luck!
Suhail, this is excellent insight. Saving me some hard lessons.
Currently using Windows 10 Servers on user-dedicated EC2 instances, so costs are bundled in, but once I get into a multi-tenant setup and cost optimization I'll see what I can work out with Microsoft.
Serverside MacOS is a nut I'm not trying to crack at the moment. Too many lawsuits of people trying to monetize Apple products.
Lastly: Mighty is an excellent move. The macro shift toward cloud-native makes browser-based tools more pervasive. You're well-positioned with Chrome, mate.
Currently using Windows 10 Servers on user-dedicated EC2 instances, so costs are bundled in, but once I get into a multi-tenant setup and cost optimization I'll see what I can work out with Microsoft.
Serverside MacOS is a nut I'm not trying to crack at the moment. Too many lawsuits of people trying to monetize Apple products.
Lastly: Mighty is an excellent move. The macro shift toward cloud-native makes browser-based tools more pervasive. You're well-positioned with Chrome, mate.
> user-dedicated EC2 instances
Ouch, that sounds expensive! I would imagine the economics of this will be a tough sell compared to one's own laptop or desktop?
Ouch, that sounds expensive! I would imagine the economics of this will be a tough sell compared to one's own laptop or desktop?
> Currently using Windows 10 Servers on user-dedicated EC2 instances, so costs are bundled in, but once I get into a multi-tenant setup and cost optimization I'll see what I can work out with Microsoft.
Good luck, but note that you are competing with Microsoft (who offers Azure Virtual Desktops), so they aren't likely to want to work out a favorable (for you) deal.
Good luck, but note that you are competing with Microsoft (who offers Azure Virtual Desktops), so they aren't likely to want to work out a favorable (for you) deal.
A bit of advice: remote desktops suck for professional developers. A workstation is more than just the software and OS. For me it already sucks to switch from standalone screen to the laptop. You also won't be able to support all the different use cases well.
My advise is to focus on one particular workflow (say vscode with Js) and perfect that one.
My advise is to focus on one particular workflow (say vscode with Js) and perfect that one.
Thanks for the critical yet constructive feedback!
The product currently available is a full-fledged remote desktop, forcing you to switch back and forth, which can certainly be sucky.
The plan is to make the remote-hosted apps pop up as a window on your local machine, as if it were running locally, when really it's hosted and ran on a cloud VM. I want the apps (VSCode, for example) to seem completely local.
Would this better accommodate your personal workflow?
The product currently available is a full-fledged remote desktop, forcing you to switch back and forth, which can certainly be sucky.
The plan is to make the remote-hosted apps pop up as a window on your local machine, as if it were running locally, when really it's hosted and ran on a cloud VM. I want the apps (VSCode, for example) to seem completely local.
Would this better accommodate your personal workflow?
While I agree that finding a niche seems like a good plan, I'm not sure that VSCode and JS is the one - node/JS cloud IDEs have already been a thing for some time now.
How is this different than https://aws.amazon.com/workspaces/
Great question! Workspaces is my most direct competitor, and the current product is exactly that - a cloud based desktop. Booste is aiming to be more layman-friendly, whereas workspaces is more IT-admin focused, from my experience.
The vision of the next build is to launch and display apps as if they were local. IE: you click the app icon and a window opens up, without you even needing to context switch into a remote system.
The vision of the next build is to launch and display apps as if they were local. IE: you click the app icon and a window opens up, without you even needing to context switch into a remote system.
Microsoft very recently GA'd their Windows Virtual Desktop offering too: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/services/virtual-desktop/
I imagine it will be tough to compete with AWS and Microsoft - I wonder if there is a niche you can specialise in?
I imagine it will be tough to compete with AWS and Microsoft - I wonder if there is a niche you can specialise in?
Wasn't this called Citrix back in the 90s?
Exactly. The tech is nothing new. I'm moreso consumerizing the Citrix tech, which has historically been enterprise-focused.
It's an amazing tech and just needs to be packaged up in a non-intimidating, non-intrusive way for laymen to use.
It's an amazing tech and just needs to be packaged up in a non-intimidating, non-intrusive way for laymen to use.
Citrix wasn't the only virtual desktop solution, and there are even more now; Azure and AWS each have them in their portfolio of cloud services, for instance.
I would love love love if this gave me a way to run Photoshop or other Win/Mac only apps from my Linux laptop. Let us request Ubuntu!
(Although millstone's comment makes me wary to suggest you do anything with Adobe's software...might want to be careful there)
(Although millstone's comment makes me wary to suggest you do anything with Adobe's software...might want to be careful there)
Millstone made an excellent point. I'm currently doing a Bring Your Own License model, which complies with your current Adobe license.
Email me at [email protected] - I can have an Ubuntu version packaged up for you within a week.
Email me at [email protected] - I can have an Ubuntu version packaged up for you within a week.
Thanks, HN for all of the signups, critique, and feedback! This my first posting here; I learned a lot in the last day, and grew the product far more than expected.
I'd like to broadly respond to the many positive and negative comments made in this post.
Product definition: -- Booste is currently a tool to spin up a full-fledged remote desktop. You access it via a third party RDP client. The full product vision is to make individual apps run remotely, yet seem local. Primary use cases, learned here, emphasize the need for cross-platform access and flexibility. Surprising learnings include a de-emphasis on the device cost-savings.
Product maturity: -- Booste is an MVP, built entirely by me over two months. My intent of this post was not to mislead with large promises, but to assess interest in the value proposition so that I make something people want. The comments, new user signups, and feature requests have been strong validation of this. Now, there's building to be done!
Product distribution: -- The initial build, launched here, had infrastructure and security components that did not scale. Following valid complaints, I've temporarily replaced the direct-download on the site with an email waitlist, so that incoming interested users can get access in the near future.
This was great. Cheers, all. Please contact me at [email protected] with any and all thoughts around this.
I'd like to broadly respond to the many positive and negative comments made in this post.
Product definition: -- Booste is currently a tool to spin up a full-fledged remote desktop. You access it via a third party RDP client. The full product vision is to make individual apps run remotely, yet seem local. Primary use cases, learned here, emphasize the need for cross-platform access and flexibility. Surprising learnings include a de-emphasis on the device cost-savings.
Product maturity: -- Booste is an MVP, built entirely by me over two months. My intent of this post was not to mislead with large promises, but to assess interest in the value proposition so that I make something people want. The comments, new user signups, and feature requests have been strong validation of this. Now, there's building to be done!
Product distribution: -- The initial build, launched here, had infrastructure and security components that did not scale. Following valid complaints, I've temporarily replaced the direct-download on the site with an email waitlist, so that incoming interested users can get access in the near future.
This was great. Cheers, all. Please contact me at [email protected] with any and all thoughts around this.
Love the idea. Suhail is doing something similar with Mighty (check it out if you haven't already). Not sure how you're streaming stuff like Adobe and Blender products, but I like the idea and I think this has some potential.
Speaking of things in the cloud, I wrote a small thread about the pros and cons if everything is in the cloud (mainly inspired by Mighty):
https://sdan.xyz/essaycloud
Speaking of things in the cloud, I wrote a small thread about the pros and cons if everything is in the cloud (mainly inspired by Mighty):
https://sdan.xyz/essaycloud
One big con for cloud and software as a service (I didn't see it mentioned in your post, maybe I've missed it) -
Being a terminal machine, you don't own or hold anything.
The Adobe Venezuela case is a good example for that. So if booste.io needs to comply to some regulation it might break those users ability to access their data.
It is a growing concern as the terminal/main-frame days are getting back at us.
Being a terminal machine, you don't own or hold anything.
The Adobe Venezuela case is a good example for that. So if booste.io needs to comply to some regulation it might break those users ability to access their data.
It is a growing concern as the terminal/main-frame days are getting back at us.
This too. Overtime I think more and more games/services may adapt to this "everything in the cloud" idea and eventually support it w/ their own licenses and whatnot.
Other than that, I've said how the cloud is like a terminal machine (as you've said). Once it's gone, you're left with on-device things to do now... which is a huge con, but there are some pros as I've described in the post. But given the number of pros and cons for both cloud and on-device, it's a hard decision/strategy to make up on what a company is going to do.
Other than that, I've said how the cloud is like a terminal machine (as you've said). Once it's gone, you're left with on-device things to do now... which is a huge con, but there are some pros as I've described in the post. But given the number of pros and cons for both cloud and on-device, it's a hard decision/strategy to make up on what a company is going to do.
This is great validation, thank you :)
I've caught wind of Suhail already and am actually really excited to see what he does with it. In fact, I hope to meet with him soon. If Mighty and Booste help consumers shift their hardware to the cloud, we build the market for each other.
Suhail, let's meet.
I've caught wind of Suhail already and am actually really excited to see what he does with it. In fact, I hope to meet with him soon. If Mighty and Booste help consumers shift their hardware to the cloud, we build the market for each other.
Suhail, let's meet.
If you can give me a way to do iOS development remotely without needing a mac I'll throw money at you.
There's a bunch of stuff like this:
https://www.macincloud.com
Does that not do what you need?
https://www.macincloud.com
Does that not do what you need?
I used a MacInCloud server as a build server for iOS apps for something like 3 years, and it was a good experience. The server was performant and totally stable, and the one time I contacted support about a billing issue, it was resolved quickly and professionally.
Recommended. Only reason I don't use it anymore is that Azure DevOps now offers MacOS build agents.
Recommended. Only reason I don't use it anymore is that Azure DevOps now offers MacOS build agents.
This is a harder one because of Apple's death grip on their OS and ecosystem. I'm wary to get too deep into it because multiple illegal cloud emulators have been taken down and sued.
I'd need to work out a licensing agreement with them first. Very encouraging and validating to have your interest in the cross-platform aspect of this though! I'll dive in.
I'd need to work out a licensing agreement with them first. Very encouraging and validating to have your interest in the cross-platform aspect of this though! I'll dive in.
Why not offer 2 minute trial sessions? I don't feel like signing up just to try this.
Thanks for the suggestion, and especially for the insight that the signup is a sticking point.
It'd take some rearchitecting to offer trial sessions in that way, but if this project gains momentum, we'll find a way to offer trials without signup, to reduce friction.
It'd take some rearchitecting to offer trial sessions in that way, but if this project gains momentum, we'll find a way to offer trials without signup, to reduce friction.
Is VS Code really a “slow AF” app for people? I have my gripes, but I generally find it relatively snappy.
Testing out the markets :)
I actually never expected to support VS Code or any dev tools at all! Launched on Product Hunt a month ago targeting 3D design and animation markets. Yet strangely, 25% of my inbounds were directly requesting VS Code, so apparently there's a need.
I actually never expected to support VS Code or any dev tools at all! Launched on Product Hunt a month ago targeting 3D design and animation markets. Yet strangely, 25% of my inbounds were directly requesting VS Code, so apparently there's a need.
Serious question:
Does your website say that "Booste runs your slow as fuck apps for you." ??
Does your website say that "Booste runs your slow as fuck apps for you." ??
Yes. You did not misread - "Slow AF Apps" - it was an intent to capture user pains and seem human.
Judging by your response, it was not in good taste. Curious to anyone else reading this: is a statement like that offputting?
Judging by your response, it was not in good taste. Curious to anyone else reading this: is a statement like that offputting?
This comment made me change my mind from:
"this is an early stage product I might consider using", to...
"this is a weekend hobby project hacked together that I should definitely not pay for or depend on for anything business related".
Some companies can pull off the very human feel, but it takes a lot of effort to do well without trashing a brand.
"this is an early stage product I might consider using", to...
"this is a weekend hobby project hacked together that I should definitely not pay for or depend on for anything business related".
Some companies can pull off the very human feel, but it takes a lot of effort to do well without trashing a brand.
Thanks for letting me into your thought process there.
Just to provide a counter example, when I see language like that it is usually an indicator to me that they're is in fact a real human writing the copy and not a committee of marketers trying to pander in order to increase profits.
It's probably not a smart move based on the other comments I'm seeing, but if you want to market things to the niche I'm in, you might find some success with it.
It's probably not a smart move based on the other comments I'm seeing, but if you want to market things to the niche I'm in, you might find some success with it.
I noticed it, it didn’t really bother me, but it didn’t make me think more favourably towards your product either.
By the sounds of the other comments on here (and the fact that you’re getting downvoted for even asking, to which I can only think “wtf?”) I suspect you’re better off rephrasing that particular line.
By the sounds of the other comments on here (and the fact that you’re getting downvoted for even asking, to which I can only think “wtf?”) I suspect you’re better off rephrasing that particular line.
Another single data point, but yes, I find swearing in a product's website to be off-putting and unprofessional.
And I say that as a Scot, where swearing is basically part of the vernacular - it's just not appropriate in a marketing setting.
And I say that as a Scot, where swearing is basically part of the vernacular - it's just not appropriate in a marketing setting.
The advice of a Scot will be taken seriously. Will be removing AF from the site.
It's not so much off-putting as it is unprofessional. I don't mind "bad words" in conversations with people I know, but I can't recall a single instance of their use in a software sales pitch (which is what your landing page should be). It implies familiarity where there is none: I simply don't know you. This is not the place to use Reddit slang.
> "I simply don't know you"
Excellent way to frame the issue here. I've removed AF from the website copy.
It's certainly unprofessional.
It seems juvenile.
How can it be practical to code on my phone without a real keyboard?
Some engineers have told me they'd like to change code on the fly (emergency situations). This product definitely leans toward small laptop and tablet use cases, but if the push for phone support arises, I'll build out what I can!
[deleted]
I hoped i could run this in a browser
It's a consideration. Certainly more portable. Thanks for letting me know it's of interest!
Just as a possibly-useful reference: https://guacamole.apache.org/
good idea. I have built a desktop cloud before.
> 90% Off Device Cost
Only if you're not counting the subscription fees. A thin client ($150 according to you, and that seems to be on the low side) and a year of the $60 plan would cost $870. You can get a lot of laptop for that money, and it would last longer than a year. And it wouldn't be tethered to the internet.
> Booste apps have no speed limit. The elastic cloud delivers the processing performance you need, when you need it.
It's still running on hardware eventually, there will inevitably be performance limits.
> 100x Faster Peer-to-Peer File Sharing
How does that help you, if it then has to get to your computer in the least efficient format possible?
> Code, run, test, and deploy projects without changing your desktop workflow.
Or.. I could just do that from my desktop, changing even less.
> [No] Expensive laptops
See above.
> [No] software installs
Read as: no flexibility.
> [No] updates
You might not be told that they're happening, but the continuous detereoration will still be there. But now you can't even do anything about it!
> [No] dependency conflicts
I'm almost surprised it doesn't claim to solve world peace.
> [No] virtual machines
Presumably it's running in one?
> [No] OS compatibility
Nonsense. You're only running Windows 10, and adding even more compatibility problems on top of that.