Neutron Star Collision Data Falsifies Dark Matter Emulators(arxiv.org)
arxiv.org
Neutron Star Collision Data Falsifies Dark Matter Emulators
https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06168v1
5 comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15550553 was posted a bit earlier, plus for highly specialized papers we tend to prefer the best popular article on the topic (though that one may not be the best).
Could someone explain this in layman's terms? I'm confused as to what is meant by a "Dark Matter Emulator".
One idea about dark matter is that the laws of gravity are
just different at large scale. This measurement rules out
some of those theories ...
> the [measurement] enables us to test a certain class of modified gravity theories, which dispense with the dark matter paradigm and reproduce Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) like behavior in the non-relativistic limit. Such modified theories of gravity have been dubbed “Dark Matter Emulators”. Some examples of these Dark Matter (DM) emulator theories include Bekenstein’s TeVeS theory and Moffat’s Scalar-Tensor-Vector gravity theory
> the [measurement] enables us to test a certain class of modified gravity theories, which dispense with the dark matter paradigm and reproduce Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) like behavior in the non-relativistic limit. Such modified theories of gravity have been dubbed “Dark Matter Emulators”. Some examples of these Dark Matter (DM) emulator theories include Bekenstein’s TeVeS theory and Moffat’s Scalar-Tensor-Vector gravity theory
Some attempts at explaining the missing matter involved modifying gravity to the effect that light and gravity waves would arrive at different times. They didn't so those theories are invalid.
"emulator" seems to be a term for a certain sort of model and simulation.
"emulator" seems to be a term for a certain sort of model and simulation.
Does anyone know if this has any effect on Erik Verlinde's theory of gravity?
[deleted]