How to camouflage yourself from facial recognition technology(social.venturebeat.com)
social.venturebeat.com
How to camouflage yourself from facial recognition technology
http://social.venturebeat.com/2010/07/02/facial-recognition-camouflage/
8 comments
Interesting, because shaving you eyebrows is easy and is not as conspicuous as painting your face.
Sure, or wearing a headband over the eyebrows. But computers probably detect faces differently, so I don't know if this would fool a computer.
The one system I read about in passing, which was surprisingly accurate, just looked for off-color blots to the bottom, left and right of a supposed face. If you're not blonde, eyebrows probably contribute more to the blot than the pupils.
"The computer can't tell you the emotional story. It can give you the exact mathematical design, but what's missing is the eyebrows."
- Frank Zappa
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." -- Pablo Picasso
I wonder where all those artists get their knowledge about computers from. Whoever thinks that computer can only give you answers, and only do what they are told to---has never debugged.
I wonder where all those artists get their knowledge about computers from. Whoever thinks that computer can only give you answers, and only do what they are told to---has never debugged.
I would guess Zappa was being obtuse on purpose.
He later composed his album 'Jazz from Hell' just for the Synclavier, no human musicians. Presumably he could potter about a bit.
I was just responding to the 'computer' and 'eyebrow' theme above, in a way that I don't now understand myself.
He later composed his album 'Jazz from Hell' just for the Synclavier, no human musicians. Presumably he could potter about a bit.
I was just responding to the 'computer' and 'eyebrow' theme above, in a way that I don't now understand myself.
Indeed.
I checked the biography of Zappa (OK, really just the Wikipedia page about him) before I wrote. It mentioned electronic stuff.
That's why I had to resort to a Picasso quote as a strawmen to make sure there's at least some validity to my complained.
I checked the biography of Zappa (OK, really just the Wikipedia page about him) before I wrote. It mentioned electronic stuff.
That's why I had to resort to a Picasso quote as a strawmen to make sure there's at least some validity to my complained.
Well, have you debugged? I've done so thousands of times, and invariably the cause was that the computer was doing exactly what I told it to do, but not what I thought I was telling it to do.
Indeed. Apart from hardware flaws and strange concurrency issues, that's the thing.
I did not express myself clear enough.
Perhaps I should have said that some people think, because computers only do what you tell them, that they can not surprise you.
Debugging and fractals are only two counterexamples.
I did not express myself clear enough.
Perhaps I should have said that some people think, because computers only do what you tell them, that they can not surprise you.
Debugging and fractals are only two counterexamples.
Or, to avoid detection by cameras entirely, lemon juice: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/the-anosogno...
"But I wore the juice!"
"But I wore the juice!"
Face paint, seriously? You might fool the software but every person that sees you will remember you forever.
"Putting paint on your face isn't always practical," he said. "This is just the way that I wanted to test this. But if you wanted to be covert, you could try wearing different styles of make-up or accessories. You could position a Band-aid on the right spot on your face. The power of this idea is that people can interpret it in their own way."
He almost had me with the band-aid, but you could only do that once, maybe twice, per social circle before it became a gimmick.
Reminds me of Pris from Blade Runner: http://bit.ly/aiM8xZ
Maybe she was just trying to avoid being recognized :)
Maybe she was just trying to avoid being recognized :)
You don't need to use URL shorteners here, friend: http://starsmedia.ign.com/stars/image/article/864/864678/top...
Reminds me of KISS.
This technique is somewhat reminiscent of Dazzle Camo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage
What's interesting is that Dazzle camo is typically used to confuse the visual systems of human beings, not computer vision, but some of the principles and tricks seem to be the same.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage
What's interesting is that Dazzle camo is typically used to confuse the visual systems of human beings, not computer vision, but some of the principles and tricks seem to be the same.
From the article:
"Harvey said he got his idea from studying camouflage methods use during World War I and World War II. His project, CV Dazzle, is based on the original dazzle camouflage used by the military to hide ships in the 1940s."
"Harvey said he got his idea from studying camouflage methods use during World War I and World War II. His project, CV Dazzle, is based on the original dazzle camouflage used by the military to hide ships in the 1940s."
liquid sky
There's never been a better time to be a creepy stalker.
Back in the beginning when Facebook wasn't stalker friendly I remember wanting to have auto tagging based on facial recognition. Now... now I'm afraid that I'll get tagged by other people in facebook (even though I'm not part of it anymore) and facebook will of course make money by selling all the facial patterns to third parties.
The applications of facial recognition make my mind fly, they remind me of Minority Report and marketers recognizing you wherever you go, it makes me think of even more divorces based on far more evidence that will be automatically available on social networks.
I think I'll start wearing some make-up a few months from now, or turn my face away every time I see a camera. The end of anonymity is near.
Back in the beginning when Facebook wasn't stalker friendly I remember wanting to have auto tagging based on facial recognition. Now... now I'm afraid that I'll get tagged by other people in facebook (even though I'm not part of it anymore) and facebook will of course make money by selling all the facial patterns to third parties.
The applications of facial recognition make my mind fly, they remind me of Minority Report and marketers recognizing you wherever you go, it makes me think of even more divorces based on far more evidence that will be automatically available on social networks.
I think I'll start wearing some make-up a few months from now, or turn my face away every time I see a camera. The end of anonymity is near.
If you're really concerned, the solution is simple. Don't tell your friends the same name that you tell the government. If a bunch of people tag you as "John Smith" on Facebook, and "Bill Smitthers" is the person that is behind on his back taxes, face recognition with data bought from Facebook is not going to find you.
Why'd you assume that the government was his (only) concern?
s/government/whatever/g;
When you register at school, you're required to use your real name. It will always come up, one way or another.
So?
BTW - In the US, there's no law mandating a unique "real name".
BTW - In the US, there's no law mandating a unique "real name".
True—your name is whatever you get people to call you, legally, at least in some states—but the very important caveat is that if you change your name or use an alias for purposes of fraud, either to defraud someone else or to defraud the gov't, that's still illegal. So for instance, it's perfectly legal for me to write my name as "Don" even though my SS card says "Donald", but then, I'm writing my actual SS# on my taxes (and paying them!), so there's no fraud.
Replying late. In Italy, or Albania, your name is registered after your gov documents. You can use a "mouth" different name with your friends, but since the register of the class is open and stays always on the room, everyone could read it.
See this example: http://i.imgur.com/ADXtF.png
The research was done by Pawan Sinha at MIT.