Reddit Adds Ability to Create your own Reddits(techcrunch.com)
techcrunch.com
Reddit Adds Ability to Create your own Reddits
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/22/reddit-adds-ability-to-create-your-own-reddits/
10 comments
But, you're changing the way that the site _can_ be used. Not saying the that recommendation engine works well, but it won't work at all if I can't rate things because I have no karma left. It also won't help me, if I use reddit in place of sites like del.icio.us or other social bookmarking sites.
Personally, I think the private subreddit thing is going to be a huge win, because it now becomes a better del.icio.us. In del.icio.us you can share links, but you can't easily discuss things about them. Now, in order for this to be really good, reddit will have to provide a "copy this to my private subreddit" and make it more blatantly apparent that you can actually become "friends" with others. It wouldn't hurt reddit if they made it super super easy to add and update the people allowed in the subreddit (I'm thinking API even).
Personally, I think the private subreddit thing is going to be a huge win, because it now becomes a better del.icio.us. In del.icio.us you can share links, but you can't easily discuss things about them. Now, in order for this to be really good, reddit will have to provide a "copy this to my private subreddit" and make it more blatantly apparent that you can actually become "friends" with others. It wouldn't hurt reddit if they made it super super easy to add and update the people allowed in the subreddit (I'm thinking API even).
I said it was just off the top of my head :-)
Anyway, the argument about a site not being useful at all if you can't rate things because you have no karma left is easily countered if you head over to Slashdot and see how their system works. http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml I absolutely agree though that it cannot be used as a del.icio.us or the like.
But it will be interesting to see how it plays out over at Reddit. I'm not holding my breath though...
Anyway, the argument about a site not being useful at all if you can't rate things because you have no karma left is easily countered if you head over to Slashdot and see how their system works. http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml I absolutely agree though that it cannot be used as a del.icio.us or the like.
But it will be interesting to see how it plays out over at Reddit. I'm not holding my breath though...
I'm not attacking you by any means, just the common misconception that any one of these 5 things will solve reddit's problems.
I'm quite familiar with Slashdot, thanks. My point about not being able to rate things without karma is more about links than comments though.
I'm quite familiar with Slashdot, thanks. My point about not being able to rate things without karma is more about links than comments though.
I didn't see it as such, more as an interesting conversation :-)
But won't you have the problem that Reddit seems to suffer from, namely that some users will downmod all other rising stories than their own? Maybe even bother to create multiple accounts for doing so?
And I agree, the above alone won't solve Reddits problems. But if someone with a bit of algorithmic sense had the dataset to look at I think that it should be possible to come up with a pretty good solution. Probably one using a multitude of technologies, of which the above may be some.
But won't you have the problem that Reddit seems to suffer from, namely that some users will downmod all other rising stories than their own? Maybe even bother to create multiple accounts for doing so?
And I agree, the above alone won't solve Reddits problems. But if someone with a bit of algorithmic sense had the dataset to look at I think that it should be possible to come up with a pretty good solution. Probably one using a multitude of technologies, of which the above may be some.
> ... namely that some users will downmod all other rising stories than their own?
Reddit's new "create your own subreddit" can have moderators that can ban users, or make it private with invites. Maybe what you'll get is something similar to flickr groups. "You contribute great stories and provide insightful comments, please come join us in our private subreddit."
This probably leads to other problems...
> Probably one using a multitude of technologies, of which the above may be some.
While I agree that stopping spammers from hitting the front page would be a great addition to any social news sites, I'd hate to see the other, not so popular uses, of these sites suffer as a result of combative strategies.
Reddit's new "create your own subreddit" can have moderators that can ban users, or make it private with invites. Maybe what you'll get is something similar to flickr groups. "You contribute great stories and provide insightful comments, please come join us in our private subreddit."
This probably leads to other problems...
> Probably one using a multitude of technologies, of which the above may be some.
While I agree that stopping spammers from hitting the front page would be a great addition to any social news sites, I'd hate to see the other, not so popular uses, of these sites suffer as a result of combative strategies.
Perhaps making a currency out of karma would work.
I think that line of thought is on the right track. The reason money hold value is that they are a scarce resource. Some can have more than others, but only if they have earned it. Thus users with more "money in the bank" can have a stronger say. (note similarity with real world ;-))
The major problem with modding systems as they are today (in my humble opinion, that is) is that there are no scarcity. We all have all the money in the world, so to speak.
What this means is that we don't save our mod points, submissions or whatever because there is no cost in losing them. We can give away money and still have an unlimited amount. And we all have equal amounts.
We need to go from socialist to a capitalist modding systems :-)
The major problem with modding systems as they are today (in my humble opinion, that is) is that there are no scarcity. We all have all the money in the world, so to speak.
What this means is that we don't save our mod points, submissions or whatever because there is no cost in losing them. We can give away money and still have an unlimited amount. And we all have equal amounts.
We need to go from socialist to a capitalist modding systems :-)
But where should it all come from? Perhaps PG would play the FED's part?
Rumor has it, when a user-generated reddit gets popular enough, it'll get its own custom alien...
This is how lies get propogated around the web. Let's wait for an official reddit team member to comment first, Alexis...
About @#%@ing time. So will Dave Winer still bother with his version? http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDig...
Ironic question in light of: http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/19/noOneAskedThisQu...
Seriously. I'm jazzed about this too.
Predictions:
1. Some private reddits will be awesome
2. This will help accelerate the nose-dive in quality on the front page of the main reddit
I don't really believe in the "#1 top story on the intertubes evar" anyway, so personal #1's are the way to go.
I don't really believe in the "#1 top story on the intertubes evar" anyway, so personal #1's are the way to go.
I've always thought this would be a really good feature for conferences or big lecture classes to have so that people could ask and vote on questions in real time.
Finally. A list-serv, I.ve been on will definitely use this.
Is Reddit supposed to be democratic? I would say its more like a republic (with the representatives elected via Reddit karma points, the powerful getting more powerful) Not that there's anything wrong with that - Seth Godin says the #1 in most categories dominates - Vanilla ice outsells all other ice cream flavors combined. People like leadership, whether its ways to amuse away a little of the day (lolcats, conspiracy theories) or MSM
"I would say its more like a republic (with the representatives elected via Reddit karma points, the powerful getting more powerful) "
What do you mean by this? As far as I know, karma doesn't have an effect on 'power', besides ridding you of CAPTCHAs.
What do you mean by this? As far as I know, karma doesn't have an effect on 'power', besides ridding you of CAPTCHAs.
I can't help but notice that 90% of the ads I see on reddit are for Wired magazine. Is the company having any success financially?
Is anyone in the loop and testing this feature out?
PG, Are there any plans to do a similar thing with YC News?
What's the point? Subycnews for subhackers?
People might find novel ways of using it once it is available.
I'd love to have one for feature ranking for my startup. Auctomatic has something along these lines which they built themselves... I've always been envious.
maybe something like sub yc's for applications questions, one for jobs, one for bay area, one for boston, etc.
There aren't really enough submissions per day to justify that, in my opinion.
It is possible, and in my opinion not all that hard, to solve this algorithmically.
One way would be to make mod points weighted, so that members that have signed up early, have high karma, have the same taste (based on their upmods and submissions) as the core group have mod points that count for more than new arrivals that have yet to build any credibility.
Another way would be to not let new arrivals submit stories until they reached a certain karma. This would mean that submitted stories would stay more true to the original idea.
Another way would be to only let users have a certain amount of mod points that would be renewed after x days, spurring users to use them more sparingly, and stopping users that up/downmod everything that is not in their particular interest.
Yet another way would be to let the system learn from the users submissions and votes, and show stories based on this calculated using datamining. Maybe as a "my {site}"
There are numerous other ways of doing it, these are just off the top of my head - and yes there are probably pitfalls in some or all of these ideas.
The point I want to make though is that the social news sites are pursuing the wrong goals once they start to gain traction. Instead of working on and constantly tweaking their algorithms they seem to focus more on new features, design, marketing or whatever.
There is an excellent business opportunity in creating back-end software to drive these sites and solve the algorithmic problems that, for some reason that is unclear to me, are so hard for these sites to do properly.