The New Science of Sentencing(themarshallproject.org)
themarshallproject.org
The New Science of Sentencing
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2015/08/04/the-new-science-of-sentencing?utm_campaign=Data%2BElixir&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Data_Elixir_47
3 comments
Hard to imagine this is science. If we want to ensure the guilty do not repeat, wouldn't killing them immediately not guarantee a recidivism rate of 0%? Unless you believe in reincarnation or ghosts at least it has a real mathematical basis.
It may be subjective, but I don't think recidivism rate is so important that you would kill people who may not reoffend, or really might not be guilty in the first place. Personally I would prefer that at least in the case of non-violent crimes, it is better to parole almost everyone to reduce the suffering of innocents.
I also found the following quote weird because the article states people are worse at predictions and more biased than statistics:
> “You mean to tell me they’re using statistics to determine what’s going to happen to me?” he asked. “That ain’t right.”
I also found the following quote weird because the article states people are worse at predictions and more biased than statistics:
> “You mean to tell me they’re using statistics to determine what’s going to happen to me?” he asked. “That ain’t right.”
I thought Minority Report was just a movie...
I wonder if those statistical models will also include how time spent within the prison increases recidivism.