Writing sustainable software for real-time human behaviour experiments
jbrookes.com1 pointsby jackbrookes0 comments
Me: spell "strawberry" with 1 bullet point per letter
ChatGPT:
S
T
R
A
W
B
E
R
R
Y
Me: How many Rs?
ChatGPT: There are three Rs in "strawberry". We sent an email to bo****@gm***.com
Which gives you a hint marbles = (BlackMarble() for _ in range(random.randint(0, 10)))
all(isinstance(m, BlackMarble) for m in marbles)
Surely should always be true
> The magic and absurdity of life is a necessary thing to create such works.
These two points seem slightly conflicting. Why if a human is truly more creative than AI, must it experience "the magic and absurdity of life" if it can be creative without "combining things into output"? Is a creative human then just not splicing and recombining their experiences into their creative output? And therefore, if an AI had more data that mirrors that experience in some way would it be sufficiently creative to create something "truly original"?
My view is that intelligence and creativity is all just purely recombination. AI can do that well just as humans can. The gap is that the data humans have access to is much more analogue, emotional, and grounded in the real world compared to the data that AI is currently trained on.