this is a very interesting workaround. our kyb policies would allow this. someone also brought up using a DAO to register a corporate entity. This could also work
> Whereas it is not so obvious that running a random script from github that spins up an agent with access to your home folder could lead to real world financial crimes.
disagree, and the courts will likely take this position as well. ignorance has never been a defensible strategy to avoid liability.
pick up a detonator, it's up to you to understand where the bombs are positions what's in the blast range.
We're a regulated entity, and this is an industry first. Magnolia (magnolia.financial) currently services all 50 US states and EU, and we're funded by draper, boost, and a bunch of others.
We're a real company :) (with health insurance!)
> With modern banking regulations and security procedures. I'm not even sure how that would be possible. Every bank account I've opened requires me to give them my photo ID and social security number, which AI agents don't have.
It's literally my job to know how it's possible, and to offer that up as a service with generous fees! Appreciate the input tho.
You are correct, KYC rules must be followed, and once you're off the waitlist (which we threw up last minute to make sure this system wasn't abused by an influx of demand) you'll be able to go through typical banking steps you're familiar with. We use persona as our KYC vendor and are highly sensitive about PII exposure.
> human would be opening a bank account...which isn't new.
An agent could open this bank account if you prefer to give it access to your social, passport, etc -- entirely up to the individual's risk profile.
What is new is a whole interface designed for an ai agent with guard rails to ensure it doesn't get itself in trouble by violating obscure BSA laws. Magnolia's job has always been to handle the compliance.
For the love of God, please. Siri is so inadequate, especially compared to virtually every other voice assistant it’s incredible. I rely very heavily on ChatGPT’s voice assistant, especially in the last week or so and all I wish is that I could plug into my iPhone for basic commands
From what I’ve seen so far the purpose is to test structured thinking, not really domain knowledge, tho that is a part of it. I’m interviewing for a position leading a payments team - I wouldn’t expect a problem related to social media
Seems like the case study is supposed to evaluate:
1. How does the candidate react to the problem
2. How do they identify “success metrics”
3. How well do they seek guidance from leadership
4. How do they go about poking at the problem
5. How do they go about constructing and validating a potential solution
I’m pretty early in my prep, so take this with a grain of salt.
For context. My background is engineering with a few yeo as TPM, the position is to lead a technical internal product with many technical challenges that may as well be considered product features
Is this satire? What option would someone have if they’re:
1. Unable to commit to a location long term (students, seasonal workers, people trying to find their fit)
2. Unable to fiscally purchase property (not everyone can just buy a condo
3. Unable to fiscally commit to a property/location - many people have dynamic incomes over time. What they can afford one year may not be the same the next.
Many people have unstable living situations one way or another, and I put myself in this category. People like the verbiage of “landlords do nothing” but in reality they take on the risk of property ownership so people forced to think short term don’t have to.
And here I had no idea there was a separate app for Spotify live. Splitting functionality out like that seems like the feature would’ve died from day one
Reframed so maybe you'd better understand the relationship between these concepts. This isn't cutting edge precedent!