Dogs have been shown to detect certain cancers at later stages (which greatly limits use as a screener.. not to mention how does the sensitivity/specificity compare to state of the art). This is not surprising since as cancers advance they cause gross biochemical changes.
The further issue diagnosing cancer/no cancer or epilepsy/no is an easy problem. But train a dog/machine on 1000 or more rare diseases. Now selectivity is an actual issue. And unless you manage to overcome that, how is all this scent stuff clinically useful?
Wow so 2 whole things are able to be identified by volatile chemicals and this leads to all?!
And I wonder how people like Holmes are able to survive for >10 years. We can deliver nicotine via patch, so obviously all drugs should be delivered that way. We can measure glucose from a drop of blood so obviously it follows that all blood tests run that way.
Where is the evidence that even a small fraction of the most common diseases have such a characteristic?
Your question is hard to parse? What is instrumenting? If it helps though... the word “baseband” itself is the lower frequency containing just the bandwidth of the signal. Ie that is the lower frequency...
The irony. Anybody with basic knowledge of CS (ie a geek user) should grok that there is no such thing as a “well-thought” hierarchy. This is the very reason relational databases exist.
And for desktop and phone purposes, search is popular because it works damn well.
Personally found this article overly dramatic and a bit dumb. All this wall of text just to point out that FMA needs to be emulated... ok.. but it’s a solved problem.
This is also not a new problem.. fmaf is defined in C99 standard so There are multiple open source library implementations of FMA using round to odd for years.
You can just read that code and see how it’s done. Despite the ridiculous ending there was no mystery to begin with.
Then you simply haven’t talked to many older pilots. Yoke, control wheel, wheel for short, they’re all the same fucking thing. This seems like a dumb way to shill, no?.
Look at the cockpit of a DC-3 or pretty much anything pre-war design that doesn’t use a stick.. it will educate you.
Also, Boeing is a multi billion dollar company.. if they’re going to shill I’m sure they’d have no trouble finding an actual pilot to do it for them. We’re not that rare.
Splitting a large monopoly into smaller territorial monopolies gets you all the drawbacks of a monopoly with none of the benefits of centralization. Pretty much a total loss. Improvement in US telecom probably had more to do with demonopolization wholesale at the national level rather than the formation of the baby bells.. which pretty much all failed.
IBS (at least some types) are very likely closely related to anxiety disorders (but with a visceral motor component). Low FODMAP has been shown to help, though it’s not clear that it is treating the psychomotor cause , but one of the best interventions is increase in physical activity... similar to GAD.
Can you cite a common definition of “array” other than a bare minimum of being randomly accessible? (Nothing else is pinned down. Fixed vs variable length, single vs mixed type, or even underlying data structure (cf NSArray)).
By the only universal definition I can think of, python lists are arrays.
Python lists most certainly meet the mathematical definition of array (ie name by index)
The further issue diagnosing cancer/no cancer or epilepsy/no is an easy problem. But train a dog/machine on 1000 or more rare diseases. Now selectivity is an actual issue. And unless you manage to overcome that, how is all this scent stuff clinically useful?