Regulators Will Excuse Venture Firms From Rules, Patricof Says(bloomberg.com)
bloomberg.com
Regulators Will Excuse Venture Firms From Rules, Patricof Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ax0nkbJLGf08
1 comments
Hmm. How about we shut down organizations that are "too big to fail"?
After all, regulators world-wide have pretty much demonstrated that they're incapable of stopping such failures. The regulated companies had worse failures and were more likely to fail.
Of course, we should start with govt agencies and affiliates (I'm looking at you Fed) s that are too big to fail....
After all, regulators world-wide have pretty much demonstrated that they're incapable of stopping such failures. The regulated companies had worse failures and were more likely to fail.
Of course, we should start with govt agencies and affiliates (I'm looking at you Fed) s that are too big to fail....
I kind of agree... but how would you do it in a controlled way is absolutely incomprehensible question...
Well, the problem of "too big to fail" arises due to counterparty interdependancy due to leverage, clearing, domino collapse, etc.
VC firms end up not financially interacting with other companies in this manner, nor do they get large enough to be "big."
VC firms end up not financially interacting with other companies in this manner, nor do they get large enough to be "big."
Since VCs usually take equity stakes or convertibles, it's pretty doubtful that they'd be able to pose a systemic risk. Usually you end up seeing systemic risks when there's multiple tiers of non-convertible debt.
What if some VC/PE company becomes "too big to fail"?
Who would have have thought that GE and GM will become financial services companies at some point?