Steven Colbert On Vessyl Digital Cup [video](thecolbertreport.cc.com)
thecolbertreport.cc.com
Steven Colbert On Vessyl Digital Cup [video]
http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/9nzwjt/vessyl-digital-cup
15 comments
1 can of coke contains 160% of your recommended daily intake of sugar. Lobbyists have worked hard to keep that information off the label, but it's true. Vessyl is an amazing feat of technology, but their messaging is confusing -- if they really want people to drink healthier, they should just encourage them to drink more water and less sugary drinks.
> they should just encourage them to drink more water and less sugary drinks.
This is a US based company. The USA is a country where water is close to being unheard of as a drink. Kids in school mostly drink milk (genuine WTF moment for me as a European kid who moved to the US), most restaurants either have soda fountains or try to upsell you on other drinks, soccer moms bring Gatorade/Powerade to their kids, etc.. I've been to restaurants where the waiter seems genuinely pissed when you ask for pitchers of water for the table and nothing else.
I guess you can't make much money from water (unless you convince the average American that the water from their tap is dirty and full of germs, in which case you can sell them placebo filters that you have to renew every other month), and that doesn't fly in the country where dollar is king.
This is a US based company. The USA is a country where water is close to being unheard of as a drink. Kids in school mostly drink milk (genuine WTF moment for me as a European kid who moved to the US), most restaurants either have soda fountains or try to upsell you on other drinks, soccer moms bring Gatorade/Powerade to their kids, etc.. I've been to restaurants where the waiter seems genuinely pissed when you ask for pitchers of water for the table and nothing else.
I guess you can't make much money from water (unless you convince the average American that the water from their tap is dirty and full of germs, in which case you can sell them placebo filters that you have to renew every other month), and that doesn't fly in the country where dollar is king.
Huh? As a European living in the US, I've had the opposite impression. I've never been to another place where every restaurant will automatically give me a free glass of water (and continuously refills it) without me even asking for it. I've also never gotten a dirty look for sticking with just water.
In Europe, you generally have to pay for bottled water, unless you specifically ask for tap water (and get a dirty look in response).
In Europe, you generally have to pay for bottled water, unless you specifically ask for tap water (and get a dirty look in response).
To be fair in a lot of places a water filter makes sense but in most cities where I assume you're talking about the type of people who buy bottled water when their mains water is just as good (in some cases better), you have a point.
Having flashbacks to putrid dead-rat water in rural New Zealand.. shudder
Having flashbacks to putrid dead-rat water in rural New Zealand.. shudder
And the damage to one's teeth from those drinks can be tremendous.
Then there's this in diet soda: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-Methylimidazole
I recently stopped drinking diet soda because of its possible health concerns and switched to brewed tea. One day I'll be completely free of caffeine also, I'm weaning myself off by simply drinking more water. I really wish I had never started drinking caffeinated sugary drinks.
Then there's this in diet soda: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-Methylimidazole
I recently stopped drinking diet soda because of its possible health concerns and switched to brewed tea. One day I'll be completely free of caffeine also, I'm weaning myself off by simply drinking more water. I really wish I had never started drinking caffeinated sugary drinks.
That particular chemical looks completely harmless.
Did you read the section under health concerns citing scientific studies? It's compelling enough that the FDA is taking another look and the companies are trying to do damage control.
Here's more info and you'll see that the companies are trying to reduce the amount of the chemical in their diet sodas:
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/01/caramel-colo...
Here's more info and you'll see that the companies are trying to reduce the amount of the chemical in their diet sodas:
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/01/caramel-colo...
All the health effects were found in animals at incredibly high doses. California added it to a list, so the soda companies are only changing their formulas to meet CA's regulations, not because of any health effects.
In consideration of tumor occurrence in the NTP rat studies, the NTP concluded that there was equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in female rats based on the occurrence of mononuclear cell leukemia and no evidence of carcinogenicity in male rats. Section 25703(a)(3) states that “risk analysis shall be based on the most sensitive study deemed to be of sufficient quality.” The NTP studies in male and female rats were not sensitive and thus are not used for the dose response assessment. Thus, while the studies were considered, they were rejected for NSRL development due to lack of sensitivity. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/law/pdf_zip/100711_4MEIfindin... So California basically ignored some of the evidence.
In consideration of tumor occurrence in the NTP rat studies, the NTP concluded that there was equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in female rats based on the occurrence of mononuclear cell leukemia and no evidence of carcinogenicity in male rats. Section 25703(a)(3) states that “risk analysis shall be based on the most sensitive study deemed to be of sufficient quality.” The NTP studies in male and female rats were not sensitive and thus are not used for the dose response assessment. Thus, while the studies were considered, they were rejected for NSRL development due to lack of sensitivity. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/law/pdf_zip/100711_4MEIfindin... So California basically ignored some of the evidence.
There's 35g of sugar in a 330ml can of coke[1]. The recommended daily intake of sugar is 90g. So it's 38.9% of your RDI, not 160%..
[1]http://www.fatsecret.com.au/calories-nutrition/coca-cola/coc...
[1]http://www.fatsecret.com.au/calories-nutrition/coca-cola/coc...
The exact amount of sugar in coke varies by geography, but in the US, it's 39g per 330ml can.
The World Health Organization recently lowered the daily recommended intake of sugar to 5% or less of your daily caloric intake or roughly 25g/day.
The World Health Organization recently lowered the daily recommended intake of sugar to 5% or less of your daily caloric intake or roughly 25g/day.
Ah cool, good to know. Just looked at their website and you're correct. I'm pretty glad you proved me wrong.
Absolutely hilarious.
What would actually be useful is something that does the same for food, although I have no idea how that'd work (perhaps a probe of some kind). It's trivial to calculate nutritional information for beverages as a human, but for those of us who track such things, I have yet to see a really good system for solid foods that doesn't rely on human guessing about portion sizes and matching to existing known entities from a database of foods.
What would actually be useful is something that does the same for food, although I have no idea how that'd work (perhaps a probe of some kind). It's trivial to calculate nutritional information for beverages as a human, but for those of us who track such things, I have yet to see a really good system for solid foods that doesn't rely on human guessing about portion sizes and matching to existing known entities from a database of foods.
Computer vision researchers are starting to work on the food calorie counting problem. See this video demo from SRI International: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rH2c_F6YB-A
Related information: http://www.psfk.com/2014/04/siri-creator-builds-platform-tha...
http://gigaom.com/2014/04/03/dont-eat-that-sri-built-a-calor...
Related information: http://www.psfk.com/2014/04/siri-creator-builds-platform-tha...
http://gigaom.com/2014/04/03/dont-eat-that-sri-built-a-calor...
Why is it trivial to calculate nutritional inoformation for beverages? In the United States, on average, 21% of our calories are consumed from beverages [1]. I know some people that just drink water, so that means there are others who are consuming probably greater than 1/4 of their calories from beverages. There is clearly a problem, in the USA, of people consuming too many calories from beverages, and it is not trivial. I think this is a good step, but there are a few ways it may be missing the mark (like why not a set of mugs that I can change the user settings of based on who in my family or friends grabbed the cup out of the cupboard.)
[1] http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/nutrans/policy/beverage/us-b...
[1] http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/nutrans/policy/beverage/us-b...
Yeah, thought that too. Some approximation on calories and macronutrients would be really great.
This would definitely serve the huge market of folks who track their daily intake:
This would definitely serve the huge market of folks who track their daily intake:
- People who (have to) do it for medical reasons
- People that want to loose weight and need to get a better understanding of what exactly they are eating every day (often times it is not enough or the ratio of macronutrients is out of place)
- Nearly every bodybuilder and fitness-addictReminiscent of the Amazon Fire Phone promo video. Woman holds up phone to a book cover and says "Fire Phone can instantly identify this book, tell me the title and where to buy it." Information previously unknown...
That information might not be as easily a a ailable to people with visual impairment.
I've never heard of the Vessyl before, but it sure looks like something that'll be gathering dust in people's cupboards.
It might be a valiant engineering effort, but the concept strikes me as a poor way to digitally tap into peoples' diet information.
The real solution is ultimately going to be at the point of purchase. Sales already happen in the digital space, so that's the logical point to start building a database of food intake. If you had a digital grocery bill, that information could be used by your digital fridge (or just a simple phone app) to track what's been purchased and consumed by each member of the family.
Taking that idea a step further, the marketing / monetization of being able to sell that usage data back to advertisers, or creating a "diet API" that knows peoples' habits after they leave the grocery store would be a gold mine. In that light, the Vessyl just seems insanely shortsighted. It's a shame that Colbert had to be the one to tell them.
Honestly, who uses the same cup every time they pour a drink?
It might be a valiant engineering effort, but the concept strikes me as a poor way to digitally tap into peoples' diet information.
The real solution is ultimately going to be at the point of purchase. Sales already happen in the digital space, so that's the logical point to start building a database of food intake. If you had a digital grocery bill, that information could be used by your digital fridge (or just a simple phone app) to track what's been purchased and consumed by each member of the family.
Taking that idea a step further, the marketing / monetization of being able to sell that usage data back to advertisers, or creating a "diet API" that knows peoples' habits after they leave the grocery store would be a gold mine. In that light, the Vessyl just seems insanely shortsighted. It's a shame that Colbert had to be the one to tell them.
Honestly, who uses the same cup every time they pour a drink?
This is pretty much what we're trying to do with Eat This Much (http://www.eatthismuch.com/). For the people that follow our meal plans, we're basically a lead gen for every single thing that person eats, and we're working on making it easier to integrate the generated meal plans with your existing habits. Combine this with automated grocery delivery, and we already know all of the foods in your fridge so you don't even need a smart fridge (though it would still help for eating things outside of the plans and tracking them).
Honestly, who uses the same cup every time they pour a drink?
Well, I do. I buy 2-liter bottles of soda because they're cheap, but they're unwieldy for consumption. At work I just have one cup, so that's what I use. I feel like lots of people already have a personal coffee mug or something. And more people would if they bought one of these.
Well, I do. I buy 2-liter bottles of soda because they're cheap, but they're unwieldy for consumption. At work I just have one cup, so that's what I use. I feel like lots of people already have a personal coffee mug or something. And more people would if they bought one of these.
Grocery stores already know what you purchase through tracking with the the club/value cards they promote. The information is sold to marketers, etc. and even in some cases used by the police and insurance companies.
I would love love love for someone to make a loyalty card with an API. It would be a win for grocery stores since they would have more accurate data and more users, who would actually be more loyal if they're able to get real personal value out of shopping at a particular store. Fine detail on what I'm buying, and when. I could see a slew of services for brick-and-mortar that can compete with some of the data that Amazon keeps to itself.
> who uses the same cup every time they pour a drink?
That is my biggest (but not only) issue with this. And if both my wife and I have one, that each syncs to our own phone, now we need to keep up with which cup is whose? Too complicated.
[Edit: I was not being sarcastic. Having two identical cups in the same house would make it difficult to make sure we are using the right cup each time. We already run into that problem occasionally with our Up bands.]
That is my biggest (but not only) issue with this. And if both my wife and I have one, that each syncs to our own phone, now we need to keep up with which cup is whose? Too complicated.
[Edit: I was not being sarcastic. Having two identical cups in the same house would make it difficult to make sure we are using the right cup each time. We already run into that problem occasionally with our Up bands.]
It seems like it would be pretty easy to mark them.
Where? And with what (that doesn't look stupid or come off in the dishwasher)?
The CEO of Vessyl responds: https://www.myvessyl.com/blog/posts/9-vessyl-on-colbert-repo...
Glad to see he was a good sport about it -- that's exactly the right way to respond to a story like this, even if you really want to blow your stack and punch the wall a few times.
Which isn't to say you shouldn't blow your stack and punch the wall, just that you should only do it in private :-D
Which isn't to say you shouldn't blow your stack and punch the wall, just that you should only do it in private :-D
Wow, that camera phone clip from the Daily Show is great. And Jon Stewart looks so much younger!
Colbert raises a great point about the practicality of it though; why would you take the time to pour a beverage into the Vessyl just to get the same readings you could have obtained from the initial container?
I don't feel like calculating how much I poured into a cup every time, or manually journaling every time I get a drink. But it would be nice to know how much soda I've had in a day.
The only reason I can think of is the listed nutritional value isn't always accurate. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't understand how this cup can be any more accurate than the label.
Honestly if I wanted to count calories and monitor my nutrition, I would rather speak to my phone what I'm currently eating and have it tally everything up. And I would gladly pay $10 for an app like that over $200 for a cup, so until someone can bring this technology down to $20-$30, I don't care.
Honestly if I wanted to count calories and monitor my nutrition, I would rather speak to my phone what I'm currently eating and have it tally everything up. And I would gladly pay $10 for an app like that over $200 for a cup, so until someone can bring this technology down to $20-$30, I don't care.
Wine.
Wine connoisseurs would probably scoff at drinking out of a giant cup. There's a whole art/science to the cup shape and ritual of drinking wine.
A hardware startup is hard enough without this kind of mocking, but mocking the new smart objects does make for some compelling humor. Google Glass for example was mocked pretty extensively recently too. This take wasn't fair, since this product saves you the time of having to type in your calories for each drink into your phone by figuring out what you are drinking, but it was funny.
What is the everyday benefit of this for the regular person? Humans have been drinking things for a long time without knowing the exact stats of their beverages. What is this product trying to optimize?
My thoughts exactly. The tech of a 'smart' cup could have cool applications to the kitchen, like measuring how much liquid you're pouring for a recipe. However as a weird 'fitbit for what you drink' device I'm really scratching my head trying to understand it too.
Yes, and Americans have become increasingly obese, partly because they don't know how many calories they are eating and drinking. What this optimizes is how much you have to think about journaling. Just check your phone occasionally to see totals, trends etc.
[deleted]
There have been clear calorie counts on foods and beverages for many years now. I seriously doubt a phone telling you how many calories you've consumed vs. reading it right off the can in front of you is going to change anything. If you are concerned about reducing calories, drink all the water you want and log a big 0 in whatever calorie tracker you use.
Weather reports existed for a long time, but it's much easier to look up the weather on my phone now. Encyclopedias, dictionaries, movie reviews too. Just because a clear calorie count exists somewhere doesn't mean I have it on the container I've got with me, or that I know how much I've had so far today.
You're missing the forest through the trees. People are still going to consume more than they need regardless of how many labels and apps are warning them otherwise. High calorie/sugary drinks taste good and bring pleasure to the brain. Solving the obesity epidemic requires re-learning how to consume and work off calories.
Look at all the warning labels on cigarettes, etc. yet people still smoke them. Would a phone app telling you how much nicotine you're consuming get you to change your habit? No, the addiction is much deeper than just a lack of awareness that it's bad. We know sugary drinks are bad but we drink them anyways because we like them.
Look at all the warning labels on cigarettes, etc. yet people still smoke them. Would a phone app telling you how much nicotine you're consuming get you to change your habit? No, the addiction is much deeper than just a lack of awareness that it's bad. We know sugary drinks are bad but we drink them anyways because we like them.
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/diet-fitness/who-cares-about-c...
Knowing the calorie content doesn't seem to help most people.
Knowing the calorie content doesn't seem to help most people.
And both groups underestimated the calories consumed in a meal, a finding supporting earlier research.
Actually, one of the study's limitations is that the research failed to examine those who used the calorie counts and did eat less, Fernstrom says, Because for some people, it’s a helpful tool.
Because, Fernstrom says, "it’s really hard to count calories -- it takes a lot of focus and mental energy when done regularly."
These quotes seem to support the idea that if calorie-counting were easier, some people would find it more effective.
Actually, one of the study's limitations is that the research failed to examine those who used the calorie counts and did eat less, Fernstrom says, Because for some people, it’s a helpful tool.
Because, Fernstrom says, "it’s really hard to count calories -- it takes a lot of focus and mental energy when done regularly."
These quotes seem to support the idea that if calorie-counting were easier, some people would find it more effective.
Are we sure there is a category of people who become obese because they are unaware that drinking a ton of cola gives them X calories? (rather then those ignoring the fact it makes them fat at all)
I think that's pretty common. The CDC agrees http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/healthy_eating/drinks.html "many people don't realize just how many calories beverages can contribute to their daily intake."
Probably calorie consumption tracking, which is becoming increasingly relevant with the all the fitness technology and the obesity epidemic.
And it's pure evil: http://munchies.vice.com/articles/calorie-counting-machines-...
I don't understand the article. You could easily hit over 800 calories with a plate of quinoa, half an avocado, some smoked mackerel, and an olive oil-dressed salad with a bit of feta cheese in it followed by a handful of nuts, but those calories are from things that are going to do you a lot of good. True! And it will also make you fat if you eat too much of it. (And the Weight-watchers points-based system isn't that bad, it doesn't count calories. http://www.calculator.net/weight-watchers-points-calculator.... )
Most of the above will make you full so those 800 calories would last a lot longer than eating 800 calories of potato chips.
Seems like a nod to the calorie is not a calorie line of reasoning, which seems pretty prevalent on Hackernews.
Seems like a nod to the calorie is not a calorie line of reasoning, which seems pretty prevalent on Hackernews.
While I'm not very confident in this product anyway, in this case the audience/marketing they got from this Colbert segment is huge.
This is a really good thing for them.
This is a really good thing for them.
Thanks for sharing what the possible use for this could be.
That's a quite a price to accomplish just that...
7 years bit was really great.
That's a quite a price to accomplish just that...
7 years bit was really great.
Appropriate to the 7 bits comment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TE0n_5qPmRM
This is what they meant when someone said that "work on real problems" was bad advice for single male engineers in San Francisco.
Talking about the design part was the best for me. We made this new elegant future cup, that looks exactly like a cup, innovation!
The silliness is easy to recognize in this context, but I roll my eyes just as much when I see some site or app with "beautiful" or "elegant" in its tagline.
This beautiful and elegant design will delight our customers while disrupting the industry with its game changing real-time social collaborative mobile experience.
Don't forget the "vibrant" colors...
It's comfortable living on a desk!
As opposed to on the ceiling where all of those other cups live.
Vessyl's reluctance to answer questions about the sensor they are using is a big red flag for me. I'm guessing it's some kind of photospectrometer? It's hard enough to build consumer gadgets even when using off-the-shelf sensors...
The other issue is that knowing how much liquid you drink is not as interesting as knowing how dehydrated you are.
The other issue is that knowing how much liquid you drink is not as interesting as knowing how dehydrated you are.
99% chance it uses a bunch of LEDs and optical sensors to measure things like refractive index and volume, couple that with a built in scale (likely a small load cell) and you can classify the drink.
Note how they never say it "measures" the sugar in your drink. They say it recognizes that it is orange crush.
I'll be interested when I can mix up a batch of sugar, water, and salt and have it tell me exactly what I've put in.
Note how they never say it "measures" the sugar in your drink. They say it recognizes that it is orange crush.
I'll be interested when I can mix up a batch of sugar, water, and salt and have it tell me exactly what I've put in.
[deleted](1)
Buying an expensive gizmo to track every liquid you consume, and limiting all your drinking to just that one gizmo, seems like an awfully roundabout way of improving your health. Simply drink more water instead.
Detecting rohypnol, or similar scenarios where you are "truth testing" the ingredients. Pretty sure rohypnol detecting glasses (or drink umbrellas, etc.) exist, but I am not Googling that.
Disposable stirring sticks and coasters that detect roofies do exist, and they're more convenient than bringing your special cup around to bars.
A "toylyt" would be a good medical analytic device actually. Get it on kickstarter Steven!
This already exists. I saw a live (text) feed of a toilet that would post statistical information about the contents — get this — in real time.
Apparently it could also determine if you have STDs, and which ones.
[EDIT] here's the site: http://quantifiedtoilets.com/#feed Apparently it also tracks blood alcohol content and doubles as a pregnancy test. The former sounds convenient for a toilet in a bar: it will tell you if you're legally able to drive before you leave the bar.
Apparently it could also determine if you have STDs, and which ones.
[EDIT] here's the site: http://quantifiedtoilets.com/#feed Apparently it also tracks blood alcohol content and doubles as a pregnancy test. The former sounds convenient for a toilet in a bar: it will tell you if you're legally able to drive before you leave the bar.
That's not real:
> This was a thought experiment
> This was a thought experiment
I think they do have toilets that analyse things and send it to your doc. in japan, for the elderly. http://mashable.com/2014/05/27/japans-lixil-apple-toilets/
How embarrassing! I never checked up on it after I first saw it, I suppose, during the experiment. I thought it was cool.
See this link for Canada: http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/Shows/TheColbertReport?vid=39...
It is the full episode with annoying ads at the beginning...