There were more than 1,000 foreign journalists in Beijing
on the night of the army's final drive to clear Tiananmen [sic.] Square, and many of them followed the advance of the main Peopled Liberation Army (P.L.A.)assault force through
the western suburbs as it plowed murderously through the
crowds of laobaixing that formed at all points to block its
path. Most of the foreign film footage of the massacre was
shot in this sector of the city, in neighborhoods like Muxidi, Fuxingman and Liubukou, where hundreds of unarmed protesters and innocent bystanders were mowed down by random gunfire from semiautomatic weapons. The troops apparently made no distinction between these people and the small number who hurled stones, rocks and Molotov cocktails or set fire to vehicles that had been used as road-blocks. Since this main theater of the massacre was by and large well covered by the foreign news media, we will focus here on some lesser-known aspects of the action along western Changan and Fuxingmen subsequently dubbed "Blood
Boulevard" by the people of Beijing.
I find this passage strangely familiar with Egypt, Syria, Ukraine or the early becoming of the Romanian revolution with whom I was very familiar. So this is pretty much about the Blood Boulevard than Tienanmen Square. Even the 1,400 soldiers 'shed their weapons and ran away' paragraph has recent echos.
After fifty days of occupation by the pro-democracy
movement, the square had finally been "returned to the
people." That would make Occupy Wall Street blush.
And last passage could serve as TL;DR
They exploit the fact that no one died during the clearing of Tiananmen Square to conceal the truth that some deaths and injuries did occur there earlier. And they use the fact that there was no bloodbath in Tiananmen Square to cover up the truth about the bloodbaths in Muxidi, Nanchizi and Liubukou. Why do we give them such an opportunity?"
I recently sent them an email about a thing I really find frustrating at HN:
Hi all,
I use a lot HN a lot and too often I receive this error:
You're submitting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks.
The most frustrating part is that I receive it after I submit the link, wouldn't be elegant to have a status icon or label that would signal that my account status is available for submitting.
This way I will not submit stories in vain
Encarta gave up arms, and Britannica is struggling.
Wikipedia is more accurate and rapid than a random search, but it definitely should not be the last word on any matter but rather be a starting point to familiarize with terms and what to search for, and that is the best way any encyclopedia can be anyway, a starting point.
I also love that there are at least 2 solutions for offline use:
The question is will it happen everywhere or be localized, I doubt that it could happen world-wide, but in some parts it could happen it happened before and could happen again.
Anyway a lot of scientist become extremist and can become scary. If history can tell something is that even the besto of scientists are bad prophets.
Also I guess it was very difficult for W3fools people to keep this up, it was a pointless effort, improving parts of W3Schools and thus working against their general message.
Another issue is that when you search about Web 2.0 (HTML, CSS JavaScript, etc), W3Schools comes among the first hits, and they have very poor examples.
The OP site used to document this but this was not a solution since W3School just fixed those issues.
> Internet is no longer a technology. The Internet is a psychology experiment.