It’s pretty well debated throughout history that society is ultimately free to put whatever constraints on behaviors that it decides are infecting it’s organic agency. John Stuart Mill is the first name that comes to mind. Paulo Freire discusses being forced to “import” a model of culture as authoritarian in nature.
I don’t owe billionaires my emotional & political deference to some notion of “in an objective vacuum”.
You can point at a method for counting that you agree with. I can still tell you to get fucked.
That this is even a question of being within the purview of a society to mitigate spooky action at a distance potential for telling the species “what’s real” if you have the $$ to buy enough ads is absurd.
The tech scene is acting like the Boomers. Entitled to control of our work and the problems we align to.
That’s not a politically defensible position. That’s exactly what religion does. What a shock a culture with deeply puritanical origins continues to feel we’re just a flock to be is emotionally curated. So much for objective views of reality.
I don’t owe billionaires my emotional & political deference to some notion of “in an objective vacuum”.
You can point at a method for counting that you agree with. I can still tell you to get fucked.
That this is even a question of being within the purview of a society to mitigate spooky action at a distance potential for telling the species “what’s real” if you have the $$ to buy enough ads is absurd.
The tech scene is acting like the Boomers. Entitled to control of our work and the problems we align to.
That’s not a politically defensible position. That’s exactly what religion does. What a shock a culture with deeply puritanical origins continues to feel we’re just a flock to be is emotionally curated. So much for objective views of reality.