xo·14 lat temu·discussHe's blackhat. Occam's razor in hand, the personal benefit is clear -- he did it the way he did because that's what blackhatters do for prestige and profit.
xo·14 lat temu·discussusing legality as an ethical corollary doesn't really cut it for me. you're invoking "the worst argument in the world" as seen here on hn.(http://lesswrong.com/lw/e95/the_worst_argument_in_the_world/)now. there is a difference between those two articles.just ask yourself: who would i invest in? the guy deceiving to work more, or the guy working to deceive more? no contest.
xo·14 lat temu·discussthanks for posting the article. was interesting, though long-winded. for all the rest of you, shut up. you're making the internet worse. go away.