>If you really want to post about how vaccines make your blood cells broadcast 5G radio wave
oh, that's a great example, actually. as far as I vaguely recall from the times before the pandemic, expressing skepticism or criticism towards the government and corporations was not against the rules.
>Twitter's rules enforcement is historically EXTREMELY casual
yes - for the privileged class, twitter does indeed "let some of that slide".
remarkably, those who bash him are the same people twitter has done everything to bend over backwards for. same on reddit, facebook, twitch, etc.
people on the opposite side of the privileged class are barely allowed to exist on those platforms - only if they police their speech very carefully to avoid breaking a myriad of vague and unwritten rules, and even then they're still subject to being unpersoned for some perceived offense committed off-platform.
>Round them up in camps and forcibly inject them at this point?
this is already happening, and it is cheered on by the same usual suspects with blue checkmarks who denounced the people who said this is going to happen a year ago as right-wing conspiracy theorists.
those who choose to avoid vaccination should be forced to wear some visible identification so others can avoid interacting with them and/or vice versa. maybe an armband with your QR code if you're one of the good guys, and some kind of badge if you're one of the undesirables?
english is not esperanto. it happens to be the native language for a significant part of the world population, and they have no obligation to accept its bastardization for the sake of inclusivity.
in every non-western country with its own language, those "some" would get rightfully ridiculed.