Aside from some veiled (but still unacceptable) misogyny, I don't see anything objectionable in the default subs. The ratio of homophobic, racist, and antisemitic remarks seems in the ballpark of any southern high school.
Is this something to still actively fight and change? Yes. But you yourself pointed out that reddit isn't making the content, nor are they encouraging it. What if the solution is MORE connected free speech, not less? The more representative a user base reddit gets, the less bigoted they'll be. I'm more worried about secretive and niche networks of extremists.
Oh man, this is really impressive. I'm usually incredulous of applied NLP but this seems to have fantastic possibilities so close to implementation, it just needs a hip little web app wrapper. I hear gradients are in.
We've spent generations filling our every waking moment with more forced broadcast stimuli, I don't blame 'millennials' for wanting to put up a minimum filter and default to their own bubble of controlled media. Why should we talk if you don't have something more interesting to say than my phone?
Actually, you can look find cases of this already. Complete neighborhood-wide monitoring of every car down to the license plate, and every individual's basic outline are captured by surveillance planes.
Also, sometimes you're trying to get somewhere very reasonable in Manhattan, but you can't hail a cab because of your, say, skin color. Uber solved that.
I see my spouse as the no-contest first-place winner in my list of important people in the world. The math doesn't work out for this to be mutual in more than two people.
How does this benefit me after the initial MVP build? Most of my time in conversation with Designers is spent guiding them back to the same set of reusable components, reminding them we already have a way of doing X, and should be as consistent as possible.
As someone who has run coops, been a member of coops, and generally been exposed to real living based on the highest ideals of marxism, it sucks for bringing about change. The union cab companies mentioned in the article didn't bring about reliable, phone-hailed, driver-rated system I get to enjoy now, Uber did. That being said, they do treat workers poorly, at about the accepted standards of unskilled labor (is Wal-Mart any better?)
I think we'll have longer-term changes that won't necessarily take the shape of the most recent anti-capitalistic movements people were raised on. Patreon, for example, is incredibly empowering for niche communities of artists and otherwise unsustainable but culturally valuable projects.
I don't think we've yet realized all the transformative possibilities a connected world has for allowing a lives to be flexible to the individual. My generation missed the boat on a mortgage and a career until retirement. Maybe we can figure out new norms for the average jane's work and life goals. Ones that look less like running on a hamster wheel.
Wow, this made me realize journalists can really write about anything without being concerned about spreading harmful, false information. I don't get the feeling the author has gained a more responsible approach to writing, just fresher blurbs to put in their health articles.
Exactly, it's not like they were scoring William Shakespeare versus every other (possibly unknown) playwright alive at the time, nor do they have the training data they'd need for it.
The Bay Area engineer is likely there to work for a company that obsoletes one or two of those unskilled laborers. I think the really scary part will be 10 years from now when everything's automated