You can't please everyone on the internet, if he had posted this on Arxiv then someone else will be complaining that Arxiv is for humans to publish and that llm output should be social media post instead. Also, the proof fits in a tweet. So why blow it up.
that's because they said they'll silently fallback in case of model training. Then they backtracked, and said they wont silently fallback, but how will anyone ever know?
My daughter suffers from Autism Level 3 and I worked with my daughter's speech therapist and OT to build tejutalks.com which helps nonverbal children communicate with the help of AI.
It's being used by around 10 kids for the last 3 months and it's really helped some of them to demonstrate that they know a lot more than they can say.
It uses Openai models underneath, although initially I started with local inference using MLX. If anyone is curious feel free to reach out.
Hi, thanks for the writeup, I wonder for the auth problem what you think about rego and OPA type solutions and their place in world in comparison to generated guards?
> ... the person next to him is probably also a combatant
Absolutely, they could even be future combatants even if they are not now. That's why killing schoolgirls in Iran, reporters in Lebanon, etc. is justified, they are all potential terrorists. It definitely can not be proven otherwise that they are not. Why take a chance? /s
Building VizPy, a prompt optimizer we've been working on for a while now.
The problem it's solving is one most people building with LLMs know well. Your prompt fails on some inputs, you don't really know why, and you end up just tweaking and re-running until something sticks. We kept hitting this ourselves and it felt like there had to be a better way than guessing.
What we figured out after a lot of research: prompt failures almost always follow a pattern. The model isn't failing randomly, it's consistently failing on a particular type of input or reasoning step. VizPy finds that pattern, distills it into a plain English rule you can actually read, and then rewrites your prompt around it. You also get the rule itself so you can review it, tweak it, or just drop it into your existing prompt directly. DSPy-compatible, no pipeline rewrite needed.
We have compared it extensively against baselines such as GEPA on benchmarks like BBH, HotPotQA, GPQA Diamond, and GDPR-Bench and VizPy wins on all of them. We'll have more benchmarks on cyber-security and chip-design coming out soon.
Anthropic released a C compiler this week that was built autonomously. We mined the entire repo for clues to reproduce the scaffolding they used and open sourced it.
+1 to this, my mom died because of COVID in India 1 months after she left US after visiting me, and I still feel guilty that I didnt insist on getting her the vaccine before she left for India, and then at the time of her death India was locked down so no flights and I wasn't even next to her. It's been 4 years but every so often I think about this. I blame myself less now after some therapy, but If you didn't try all that you could you'd probably feel guilty like me.
Yeah I don't understand why the whole thread has been so hostile against a very reasonable/useful observation that you made. If there was a way to prompt commenters to be less snarky on HN that'd be a vast improvement.
The brits were also running the opium shops. So if you think country A selling opiods in country B and then going to war so that country B can not stop the sale of opiods is totally okay, then that is truly very different from my model of good behavior.
I don't know if you are just ignorant about history and unwilling to Google, or if you are making the point that of course British did not force feed opium to the people.
What is very well established is that the british fought a war , literally called the opium war by Western historians themselves with the main objective of keeping their opium distribution into China open after the emperor banned it
Their action was akin to if some majority owner of Purdue pharma invades US and forces US government to "keep the oxy market open" while letting "people make their own decision".
The hidden variable is the previa marketing budget. They have budget right now for a billboard and for online ads at the same time and they are focusing on your geography
A few months ago I read about a lady who can smell Alzheimer's and at first she too was not taken seriously. I can't think of how RF can affect human body but I wouldn't dismiss their reports completely.