Kind of funny that they are the middle man for traffic on behalf of website distributors, and they are not helpful when it comes to serving malicious traffic, and tor is the biggest middle man for traffic on behalf of website users, and they are very punishing to tor users because of malicious traffic. So by their example, we should be unforgiving and unfriendly to cloudflare.
> Demographic/diversity shouldn't be a criteria for office location.
Black cities are backwards and shitty and don't have CS grads, so no tech companies are HQed in black cities, but it's got nothing to do with race. I'm not racist: I'd have lots of black friends if they weren't all living in poor neighborhoods and jail where I don't go. We avoid logic and good data and good analysis of data when it comes to race, this post is at least getting a little closer.
Haha. The market will fix racism? For one, there is a competitive advantage to racism sometimes, for two, based on history, it seems the market is not that efficient.
> it's not enough to just look within the 'hire' cohort.
Enough for what? Why not? They specifically have a "score", not just a hire / no hire decision. Sure it would be better, but you don't make any convincing argument why their analysis is not valuable.
> designed to be a Classifier, typically tuned with an emphasis on having a low false positive rate.
classifier of what? Why is classifier capitalized? I don't think so.
How do you check that? I've found reporting on race in tech to just be absolutely horrible with numbers. Whole stories where the only number is "Google repots X percent of Y race." It tells me absolutely nothing without comparing that to demographics of where google has offices, and what the demographics of cs students are, among other things, and I've never seen that info.
"Our results showed that although casual
contributors are rather common (48.98% of the whole population
of contributors in the projects analyzed), they are responsible for
only 1.73% of the total number of commits."
I didn't say they were clueless. I said their pr is clueless. Some pr person said "there is no risk" relating to it security of a large organization. That is obviously false, and clueless.
Few months ago got an LG G4: the "unlocked international" version had a locked bootloader so you couldn't change the software, but the europe and t-mobile versions didn't. So, sometimes it can be the reverse.
> Topics and queues with different segmentation features are much more powerful and fine-grained in control compared to a service that's tied to HTTP transport than, say, a REST or SOAP API.
"than" and beyond is an illogical statement. Like Y is Z than X.