Looks to me like they're using an LLM for _translation_, not for generating a response. The model output even says "Here's the _translation_" (emphasis mine).
Minio used to be de facto here, but they did a bait and switch recently and removed the UI from the free version. Garage is probably closest to best in class for open source on prem.
There's also https://plugandplink.com/, which includes a hardware component to help the person learning (lights on the snake).
The app also includes preprepared videos and lessons (scales, arpeggios etc.) which interact with the hardware component.
My son's been using it with a tutor remotely and it's been working great! Not only that, but he can use the app and the snake to self-guide his practise during the rest of the week.
The community edition of PyCharm is pretty widely regarded. VSCode is also pretty good but I would say it's more of an impressive text editor than an IDE.
Uh, did it? I mean, it talked about kids and YouTube in the last couple of paragraphs, which is an aspect to consider, but the rest of the article focused on the study, its limitations and the possible implications.
Ocean sciences would be good (oceanography, marine biology, remote sensing), but I'm not sure to what level of detail you're willing to split subjects.
> They have a great approach to recommend inviting surprising and unexpected people. I don't work in publishing or journalism and have been twice, for example.
Fair enough.
> Same is surely true of topics presented on stages.
In my line of work (science) the topics are submitted ahead of the conference and then relevant papers/talks are submitted to each of those. As such, anyone is able to propose a topic so long as they can justify its inclusion.
> To attract a mix of industry leaders the mix of weekday / weekend days is a pragmatic choice.
I'm not sure I understand why industry leaders are more likely to attend if it's at the weekend. Surely if it's their industry, it's part of their work and so they can come during the work week.
> It's all voluntary of course!
In principle, at least. Of course, if a lot of important decisions are being make the in voluntary evening activities, then those that choose not to or can't go to the evening events are at a disadvantage. Point taken about early birds.
All that said, I can definitely see the benefit of organised social activities.
> That's because real things are happening, difficult issues are actually being resolved, voices are listened to and progress gets made.
This sounds awfully like the tag line for some startup.
> people who sit at the back or like to take time off for sightseeing
An interest in sightseeing or a quieter demeanor is not mutually exclusive of valuable contributions.
1. Invite-only increases the likelihood of an echo chamber, in my mind. I go to conferences to find out about things that arean't already on my radar.
2. This approach means only topics championed by those loud enough to speak up are discussed. There's no possibility for niche topics to get an airing if noone else knows anything about them since there's less likely to be a consensus to add them to the agenda.
3. One of the best aspects of attending a conference in my mind is the ability to combine it with a bit of tourism. I suppose that's a personal preference.
4. That's good for now, but when Google an The Knight Foundation stop supporting it, who's going to pay?
5. This is terrible. Work is for the week, weekends are my time and my work does not get to encroach on that.
6. Great, so at the end of the day, I can't even relax in the hotel room. So the next day, I'm wiped before we even start.
