So your hypothesis is that considering only school shootings, you can prove that they are not random events lets say at 95%. Care to make the case using science rather then just waving your hands?
The auther does a horrible job. He takes it as an assumption that the reader doesn't know statistics, and when he gets to the actual meat he just states as fact, "i calculate k=32.5 m/j" " what does this mean? It means I'm right" he should as a minimum either assume completely that the reader knows everything nessesary to interpret the hypothesis test or actually make an effort to explain to layman what the p-value means.