For any news junkies heres, I've built https://maagnit.com which gathers both Left and Right leaning sources for any story and displays them altogether on one page.
My approach has been, if we can't get neutral/objective coverage, getting comprehensive, 360 desgree coverage is a good alternative.
These days, news bias is not only in the way a story is covered, but also which stories are covered. So, maagnit automatically collects stories from the left and right.
From the article: Though identified as ''patient zero'', Wei may not be the first person to have contracted coronavirus in China, the report said. A study in Lancet medical journal claims the first person diagnosed with COVID-19 was identified on December 1.
I got into this a couple months ago and it’s been absolutely life changing. Really like this book and most of the content / literature / podcasts he puts out.
is it proper to do what is right for the country even if that is opposite of what your campaign promises were and opposite of what the elextorate wanted? genuinely curious. not american, live in asia, so quite impartial
This seems to take a very inclusive account of government spending but maybe not so for the attackers. We may need to consider the recruiting costs and ongoing operation cost for years leading up to the attack - even for expenses unrelated to the attack but part of the support and growth that led to it. You could argue that every AQ expense upto 911 was in some way building towards that event. I think if we have such a broad account of the government spend, we should do likewise for the other side. But your point is still good.