I agree with you. The message is mixed. You shouldn't have kids because climate change / woman should go into workforce, yet on the other hand we need people to support our eldery.
So which is it? You can pile up immigrants to support eldery, but why don't we work on baby boom within our communities? Why don't western woman have 6-7 kids, like their African counterparts?
I think many men today have their brains altered from watching too much excessive porn. Fetishes develop and normal healthy relationships become problematic due to performance issues. There are many worse thing than porn, yes, but to be healthy well rounded adult, it does not help (at least excessive). Family can help, but some topics are taboo in many families, especially when man ego is in question. If you could not statisfy your wife, would you speak with your mother for help?
Yes, you can say it should start from young age, but both parents are at work and kids are left with high-speed internet and tablets. They react positively to porn and can get addicted - its a single click away. Hard to prevent that, eh.
I think we will witness the true effect of porn on males mind in future.
The point is that proportion of young adults that will access to porn will change from 100% to ~25%. Of course people will find a way, but the question is how much effort will they put in before they give up. If the effort barrier is too high, you will cull off some people - the purpose of this legislation.
I have noticed it, do not worry. I would gladly migrate to US. I am from Europe, highly educated and believe I can contribute to the economy of US. I wish your immigration could be merit based - instead of green card lottery (silly concept). Give me ability to migrate to US for 2 years as probation period. After those 2 years had elapsed, determine if I am overall positive for the economy, did I commit any serious crimes, do I have permanent place to live, etc...; and based on that, let me stay permanently in the country, until I get citizenship.
My stance is typically anti-immigration, but I do not support this decision of ICE. I am likely missing big chunk of the story, but could anyone explain the motives behind ICE decision? (without blind hateful virtue-signaling please)
I am much more comfortable refactoring my codebase and gradually raise standards of quality of it because of unit tests. If I change piece of code I will know if I modified key functionality of my software. When someone else is editing the code, he is also confident that the module he did not work on is still working as expected. He does not need check up with me and waste mine and his time. I am not sure why would you test your code manually. Total redundancy.
If you cannot see major bias of media and tech giants towards liberal agenda, you have missed what ~ 60M americans noticed before casting their vote for Trump. It is an effort to influnce US elections (which failed in 2016). I see nothing wrong with Trumps post.
I would convert the datasets to .csv (.parquet if needed), rent EC2 instance and load it with pandas. In my opinion you should thrive to have dataset in memory if possible - you will benefit from great iteration speeds on tweaking of your model.
I recommend going with fzf. I can search my whole hard drive with fuzzy expressions (e.g. "find all files which are in home directory and ends with .py" == search: home py$). Both home and / directories are searched completely within 2-3 seconds, just enough time for you to type what you are searching for. High recommendation.
Important thing to keep in mind regarding UBI is that goverment does not generate any money. In order for goverment to give money, it needs to take it from someone.
So UBI is just proxy for wealth redistribution. Sure, wellbeing has improved for small group of people, but the question is how scalable UBI is? Remember, road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Realisticly, Tesla has done more for self-driving cars than any company in the world. It is almost synonym with self-driving car. Mistakes are inevitable no matter what you do, so I would be careful with your last statement.