That 12 fps number is absolutely arbitrary. There is no threshold that changes between 11 and 12. This topic always seems to attract so many myths.
Even the difference between 110 and 120 fps is clearly visible for most. And while sensitivity may vary: I doubt that anyone could not be able to instantly see the difference between 30 and 60. How was this tested? Sure that the frames were being delivered?
> Podcasting could be a lot bigger if the clients were more than downloadable file managers, if it was just a couple taps to hear a show
I agree about the clients being key. Although there are now great
clients for smartphones (eg Pocket casts). But a big factor probably
also is that you can easily download them on your phone now and don't
have to plug your mp3 player in.
> when they say "podcast resurgence" and that's honestly about one thing: ad money.
And that's somewhat annoying. Even the big ones (This American life)
have big ad segments. Some even multiple times per show and almost
always spoken by the cast themselves. I feel there might quickly
something like Adblock for Podcasts become relevant, with the ad
timecodes collaborated and cut out.
Well 5 is a bit boring, no? For me at least that would be filled with mail, browser, whatsapp, public transportation app and runtastic.
Beyond that: moon Reader, pocket, pocket casts, calculator++, Wikipedia
Yes! The most valuable information is usually not the pure content but rather things that deviate from that. So contextual information, relationships between things, knowing what's important (the gist) and what's unclear. Especially the last part tends to be what at the end of the day gives new insights
Even the difference between 110 and 120 fps is clearly visible for most. And while sensitivity may vary: I doubt that anyone could not be able to instantly see the difference between 30 and 60. How was this tested? Sure that the frames were being delivered?