I dont know what they were thinking.. but in any wiki I have used anyone can make corrections and there is a shared responsibility to keep it up to date..
it seems to me that the statement is therefor valid - the basics of what is or is not a good answer is set by the asker not the community, which is how ticketing / Q&A systems work NOT wikis IMHO.
I dont know what they were thinking.. but in any wiki I have used anyone can make corrections and there is a shared responsibility to keep it up to date..
it seems to me that the statement is therefor valid - the basics of what is or is not a good answer is set by the asker not the community, which is how ticketing / Q&A systems work NOT wikis IMHO.