Your observation, while accurate, is a tangent. The point of the bibliography in the context of an academic paper is to reference the academic merit of the work. In the case of science, this would be reproducible experiments (ideally).
Perhaps you would prefer to include the generated text source as an author.
A long time ago I did high school math instruction. I used Sudoku for an initial introduction to proofs - something where the student knew they were implicitly going through a "proof" process.
We are building a platform for development and testing your code on simulated and/or benchmarked hardware - with computer vision applications as our beachhead market. We liken it to "CAD for CV".
We have a great team and are growing (right now!) in a lot of areas:
Are you building [Ice Skates] or are you building [Ear muffs]?
Ice skates allow you to do something new that you didn't even know you had a demand for. Ear muffs solve a problem that you were already solving poorly (with your hands).
[Business vs toy] is an insanely counterproductive mental framework which will create a false sense of security in founders who are actually building crap - just because you can play with it does not mean it has value.