Am I the only one wondering if it's 26 chickens at once from a single artificial egg or they just succeeded 26 times with different eggs? Rationally it probably has to be the latter, but the title confuses me.
True, but don't you think the FBI director should be held to higher standards of security hygiene than average people? Because I'm interpreting your tone as "it could happen to anyone". At some point the doubt is gone and there's no more benefit to give...
Apologies, I should have been more specific. "Mature" was a reference to its feature set, not its stability. It runs fine in my setup. I meant things like automatic resolution and scale switching, for example, without having to edit my config file Indeed, I can script that myself, I will. My point is more that if that's the kind of thing I need to do myself, then I'm not paying 60 euro a year.
Am I interpreting this correctly to say that if you travel through the universe (at relativistic speeds?) and you arive at your destination, then you are reset to be the same person as when you started the journey?
As a freelancer myself I go one step further and actually charge hourly rates. This granularity helps both with short workshops and fulltime projects because with the latter I'm often asked to work overtime or I have personal errands to run. Charging by the hour smooths this quite a lot.
Strongly agree, yet debates about improving the ergonomics of the language, for which there clearly "is a market", seem to be hindered by those zealous activists. A minority, I'm certain, but vocal nonetheless.
It really can be small stuff too, like hiding that nested generic "GC adjacent" type salad to be accessible only if you need it, via a type alias. Yes, I can define that myself, but the point is that a lot of people need it often, given its widespread use.l, so why not provide one?
I'm sure there's reasons not to do the above example, but that's not the point. It feels like Rust is at 95% of being amazing, and that the remaining 5% is attainable if we want to.
Your explanation is appreciated. I naively assumed HN moderation was more meta than that. It boils down to taste, ultimately. I'm really a fan of Rust, and it is sobering to now experience this gatekeeping that the Rust community is often accused of first hand.
Of course, mixing keywords single quotes is confusing, but currently the single quote is also confusing.
Just to illustrate: The keyword could just be called lif, which has the same length as dyn.
When is someone a Rust developer and why do you assume that I am not one?
edit: -4 points on my parent comment for a totally valid opinion, not violating any commenting guide line (please enlighten me). However, for the down voters: "Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. That tramples curiosity."
A lifetime keyword would actually go a long way in improving ergonomics. You could even make it synonymous with '. Then people can choose. Maybe one will get much more traction and the other can be deprecated.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257929
This was what I read: https://colossal.com/colossal-biosciences-artificial-egg-dod...