This passage completely undercuts the overall message the author is going for. The idea that the All In podcast or the remaining users of Twitter are authoritative is laughable.
No, it couldn’t. The tools to which you compare require a different or complementary set of skills to use, and the user must understand the output or mode of operation that the tool conveys.
Prompt engineering (within the context of ChatGPT) is more useful for jailbreaking than using it for its intended purpose, aside from which, the complaint of the OP from the linked post is that their coworkers do not understand the output, if they did, they would not rely on ChatGPT as a smokescreen.
This doesn’t seem to comport with Amazon’s experience, investment, and trajectory with Graviton, based on public reference customers and a few personal anecdotes.
Ballmer’s purchase of Nokia was a tremendous waste of money, it’s taken a lot of effort under Nadella to right the ship. The scope and performance of (at the time) Windows Azure was not particularly good under Ballmer, but was repositioned under Nadella. The criticism of Ballmer is not unjustified, he lingered around for years after his effectiveness.
Personally, I don’t view Microsoft as a consumer company, and Xbox should have been jettisoned after the 360.
With a tool like this, you could get back into the animutation scene.
(Edit: I guess it's a bit of a non-sequitur, but I enjoyed Suzukisan, so there's that.)
