Admittedly, a generalized diagram from a press release is not direct evidence. A diagram only serves to clarify a concept in terms clearer than a passage of text.
It's true that any actor in an espionage/sabotage operation will attempt to obscure their hand in the matter, and obvious evidence should be treated with suspicion. One might be tempted to conclude that the anticipation of evidence among actors renders actual evidence collection futile.
Unfortunately, John McAfee's hypothesis is not backed by evidence at all. It's just his gut instinct.
I wonder if John McAfee's methodology of inverting evidence, by way of evidence tampering/obscuring motives, holds up against other scenarios. Stuxnet, or Snowden leaks for example.
Sure, all *THOSE* things *LOOK* like
they originate from the NSA, but that
what you're *SUPPOSED* to think, mannn!
It's true that any actor in an espionage/sabotage operation will attempt to obscure their hand in the matter, and obvious evidence should be treated with suspicion. One might be tempted to conclude that the anticipation of evidence among actors renders actual evidence collection futile.
Unfortunately, John McAfee's hypothesis is not backed by evidence at all. It's just his gut instinct.
I wonder if John McAfee's methodology of inverting evidence, by way of evidence tampering/obscuring motives, holds up against other scenarios. Stuxnet, or Snowden leaks for example.