Because most of it is circa 1998 Slashdot-esque content which really isn't constructive and only damages what little faith people have in this industry even further. The article itself is vitriol.
Not only that, the site is designed to intentionally hide the author obviously because being accountable for an opinion is probably bad for them in this case.
Clearly SQL Server definitely wasn't suitable for our 4.5TiB of LoB financial data in 500 tables for the last 15 years and was such poor quality that we have absolutely no problems whatsoever running two 48 core Xeons with 64GiB of RAM at 50% load 24/7...
Edit: I live down the road from the guy:
Matthew Byrne (address removed, but lives in Shepperton, UK)
Please have enough balls to put your name on the site and the article or enough skills to hide your whois entry.
Not only that, the site is designed to intentionally hide the author obviously because being accountable for an opinion is probably bad for them in this case.