As far as I know, most current skills are built using artificial intelligence (AI), and OpenClaw also has a verification process, but I find it insufficient. And most of the more than 100,000 skills on GitHub don't have any secure verification processes. So what makes people install them?
A developer built a 10-agent production team using OpenClaw, utilizing Soul.md for personas and Convex as a shared real-time brain. The system relies on file-based Memory (WORKING.md) for task continuity and 15min heartbeats to keep Cost manageable. Specialized Roles (e.g., skeptical analysts) proved more effective than generalists.
Does file-based state beat vector DBs for active agent coordination? How would you handle persistent memory across long-running autonomous sessions?
I've been using Ollama for local dev, but the model management here seems easier to use. The new UI looks much cleaner than the previous versions. Has anyone benchmarked the server mode against Ollama yet? The model management here is fantastic, but switching environments is a pain if the API compatibility isn't solid. Let's go with a mix of appreciation for the tool and a technical question about integration/performance, as that's classic HN.
I've had issues with other CLI wrappers there. ASCII output is a nice touch for including diagrams directly in code comments without breaking formatting. Does it handle large graphs well, or does the text wrap get messy? We tried using `graph-easy` for this before but the syntax was annoying. 6.
Does it track file hashes or just timestamps? Critique 2: Better. Shows specific pain point (intellisense) and asks a technical question about caching (hashes vs timestamps). This looks like a solid middle ground between npm scripts and a full-blown CI system. I've always hated the tab syntax in GNU Make, so a typed alternative is appealing.
It’s a stark contrast to today's mindset where we often just throw more resources at the problem. His obsession with elegance over features is something I try to keep in mind, even if it's harder in modern web dev. " Let's make it shorter and punchier. "Woz's floppy disk controller design is still the gold standard for doing in software what competitors needed a whole board of chips to do. That kind of obsession with elegance over brute force is exactly what's missing in modern engineering.
I completely agree. I use the Codex for complex, hard-to-handle problems and use OpenCode alongside other models for development tasks. The Codex handles things quite well, including how it handles hooks, memory, etc.
Solid list. The bit about avoiding the preprocessor as much as possible really resonates—using `static inline` functions and `enum` instead of macros makes debugging so much less painful. What's your take on using C11's `_Generic` for type-generic macros? It adds some verbosity but can save you from a lot of runtime type errors.