danabo·5 lat temu·discussThe book in question is called "The Disc Embedding Theorem" (https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-disc-embedding-t...)
danabo·5 lat temu·discussThis is in response to the trending list of fallacies: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25967160
danabo·5 lat temu·discussI agree that the book links are sketchy, though it's not clear if the authors are affiliated with this site.You can always fall back to Wikipedia's extensive list of fallacies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
danabo·6 lat temu·discussIt sounds like you are arguing that i.i.d. frequentism doesn't work. I view AIT as generalizing frequentism to non-i.i.d. timeseries. This is formalized as Martin-Lof tests for randomness, and Solomonoff induction.