There's no one correct way to respectfully flirt, but if you consistently make an effort to be (1) genuine, (2) interested, and (3) confident, you'll often find it's not hard to be respectful. Overall, just get out and meet people with the goal of meeting people and making friends and it'll come naturally.
Just like anything else, get out and try, and keep track of what works and what doesn't.
This is bad information. Certainly it can work out like this, but suing your employer in the US is very very difficult. Most tech workers have even signed away their right to do so via forced arbitration agreements. And even if you do, you're more likely to just waste your money pursuing the case (which a good attorney will tell you beforehand).
I've seen this go both ways, it's certainly effective when it does work, but it's sluggish and often won't provide the relief needed by workers in any acceptable time frame.
There were a handful of events like what you describe, but the violence was overwhelmingly inflicted upon protesters by police. This came in the form of physical violence, aiming projectiles at protesters' heads, and of course the various chemical weaponry that was used in such quantities that it appeared on NASA weather satellites.
> That three millisecond time doesn't make sense as the timeout for a connect() call.
> Yes, I know. And it wasn't the timeout, actually. In the story, I make it sound like it took all of ten minutes from being made aware of the 500-mile email limit and determining a 3 ms light-speed issue. In fact, this took several hours, and quite a bit of detective work. The point is, eventually I came up with that figure, ran units, and gagged on my latte. (I'm fairly certain it was a different latte from the one I started with.) So what, in particular, is your question about the 3 ms figure?
Would anyone mind citing an instance of this toxic Twitter behavior? I don't dispute that individual tweets can be enough to wreck your career in certain circumstances but it's a high bar and haven't noticed any links to twitter.com supporting these accusations.
this sounds like a good idea but in practice, shit rolls downhill. end of the day it just depends on the people above you not being jerks, and if they are there is no trick to overcoming it.
That's not true, by learning what it feels like to sing different notes it's absolutely possible to "learn" perfect pitch. There are some individuals of course who are born with a very acute sensitivity from a very young age (which is spooky) but there are also people who learn it later.
If you can imagine learning to recognize and accurately sing just one particular note (say, middle C). Then if you develop amazing "relative" pitch it's basically the same thing. Training more still will enable you to hear very subtle differences in tuning, but it has to be a standard part of your training.
It works the other way too. If they're doing a "good" job (usually stated as decreased crime rate relative to recent years) they must be very effective at utilizing their resources, so we should fund police more. If they're doing a "bad" job (elevated crime) then obviously the police are under-resourced and we should fund the police more.
Well, in the course of my daily work I don't do anything depraved or antisocial, my work simply doesn't require it. If it did I would quit. If your job entails tear-gassing entire neighborhoods, I think the correct response is to stop doing that job, not whine about citizens trying to find out who is doing it.
This is a specious comparison, and you need to consider both the consequences to you of a failure of the business as well as paths of recourse available to the consumer.
Consider your comparison of google to a restaurant. Google can bring your entire business to a halt with no explanation, costing you potentially your livelihood. You may never get the opportunity to escalate to a point where a human will reconsider the matter. They do this as a matter of routine.
A restaurant can bring you cold soup or something, and you can complain at a waiter right there on the spot (if you're so inclined). They'll probably give you a free meal for it. Absolute worst case they can give you food which is poisoned and there is strong precedent that in this case, if you escalate sufficiently, they will be shut down.
I feel like a lot of the people I'm around every day know, but since most of my socialization is in a work context we don't talk about it much. Maybe others are similar.
Thank you for being out there. Politicians need to hear from people on the streets.
Yeah, but it would probably also be pretty terrible to work next to people you're pretty sure are okay with (say) police murdering people of your skin color. In America, this is the default position, as evidenced by both major political parties largely supporting police despite this behavior. So in order to say "we aren't okay with that opinion in this workplace" and to have a pretty good idea your coworkers don't want you dead, you have to say it -- it isn't assumed.
It could be done in a 2-line flask app. Josh's blog is about building things using Gatsby and the tooling built around the React ecosystem. So he wrote about how to build it with that.
I don't know that I'd call it "standard practice" but it's a programming tradition to demonstrate how to use a set of tools by building something simple with them.
Just like anything else, get out and try, and keep track of what works and what doesn't.