Steve Jobs would have agreed with you at one point.
I'm not sure what changed his mind (or if he ever even really did), but he also thought that aside from the native apps that came with the iPhone, everything else should just be a web app.
This reminds me of a blog post [1] I read before. Pertinent quote:
> Unbeknownst to me, even with --dry-run pip will execute arbitrary code found in the package's setup.py. In fact, merely asking pip to download a package can execute arbitrary code (see pip issues 7325 [2] and 1884 [3] for more details)!
Almost everything here is an unmitigated disaster. However,
> the secret exemption of Alameda from certain aspects of FTX.com’s auto-liquidation protocol
— barring the part where this is secret — this seems like it would make some sense?
Alameda was, by my understanding, meant to be a market maker for the markets that FTX allowed its customers to trade in. You probably don’t want to apply the same auto-liquidation protocol to the market maker as you would regular traders.
Of course, I’m not a finance person, so I’d be happy to be enlightened here.
Same. My requirements are very basic, so the switch to colima was basically seamless. I also appreciated being able to avoid Docker Desktop constantly trying to update itself (which is what ultimately motivated me to make the switch).
As a bonus, you can install the Docker CLI (e.g. `brew install --formula docker`) and use that to interact with any containers you start with colima.
I'm really impressed at how this article uses exactly the right amount of detail to illustrate the points it's trying to make. I've read too many that either have too much or (more typically) too little. That's a really difficult balance to achieve.
Prefixing `arch -arm64` is pretty solid advice still, I think. It's really easy to inadvertently run your terminal in Rosetta, and not notice that you're running a non-native version of `brew`.
Note that the argument you've called ridiculous is a response to someone who does not want a
> closed source, walled garden product from a company with business practices I don't like
Such a person probably won't be using Xcode, nor has any plans of publishing to the App Store, so Xcode being closed-source isn't a factor at all here.
The claims I made are not solely about China: they're true about very many other developing countries as well. See, for example, India.
That said, I would dispute the claim that China's economic system is distinctly non-neoliberal. In fact, most of the key elements of China's economic reform were about bringing it closer to neoliberalism rather than taking it further away.
Care to elaborate a bit on those? Or is it the kind of thing that's impolite to discuss?