FTC != FCC. Also Google didn't admit guilt in said settlement.
It's not a question of deception, it's about a bug that was patched once disclosed with no indication to it being anything other than a mistake. It's a petty case brought by petty people, and your factless defence of their "cause" is puzzling.
It might come as a shock to you but people (and corporations) try to win in court, arguing over jurisdiction is an automatic first step - nothing extraordinary is happening here.
And if you need someone to point for you the difference between this no harm money/publicly seeking bullshit lawsuit, and chemical spill disasters then you lack all perspective.
Google has been called "arrogant and immoral" - by whom? the plaintiff?!
Google is arguing about jurisdiction in front of a judge, why is the author doing publicity work for the plaintiff? and why is a routine legal argument news?