"London’s thriving economy generates a £26.5bn surplus that is recycled by the government to provide financial help to Britain’s less well-off regions, according to an official breakdown of the public finances."
and
"Every Londoner provided £3,070 more in tax revenues than they received in public spending, while people living in the south-east ran a surplus of £1,670 per head."
It wasn't banned in the UK & the BBFC passed it uncut. Stanley Kubrick himself requested it be withdrawn from distribution after some copycat incidents.
The speed limit is a bit of a red herring. The average speed of traffic in central London is about 9 miles/hour & inner London about 12. The average speed in the suburbs (outer London) is about 20 mph, even though the speed limit is 30 mph.
The Psion 7 (& Netbook) have IMHO the absolute best keyboards for their form factor. I still use my Netbook for distraction-free writing. It doesn't run on AA batteries but will easily last a couple of days on one charge. At just over 1kg it's effortless to carry about & the shape makes it easy to clutch in one hand. For me it's the ideal note-taking machine.
And most people couldn't tell the difference between a genuine paper on quantum mechanics and one generated by a machine. Would that mean machines could write genuine papers on quantum mechanics? This article says more about most people's ignorance of poetry than anything else.
Glacier is for storing records that by law you have to keep for a certain period of time (e.g. 6 years for expenses, tax & accounting, etc.) but that you have no intention of ever retrieving yourself. It's not a cheap backup solution.
As someone who did use an Archimedes A440 when it came out (late 1987 I think), it was plenty zippy enough. It's original desktop shell Arthur was written in BBC Basic, so I think it could have handled Smalltalk. There is a port of Squeak for recent versions of RiscOS (http://www.rowledge.org/tim/squeak/).
To be fair, the paper is by a mathematician, not a philosopher. The question is valid - what /do/ mathematicians mean when they use the term 'morally'? It doesn't seem to have much to do with what most people (including philosophers) think it means. Rather, it appears from the examples given that it is equivalent to 'by my gut feeling' which we might call 'intuition' if that didn't have a more specific meaning wrt mathematics (though, ironically, intuitionism would seem to fit the author's position quite well, e.g. "The truth of a mathematical statement can only be conceived via a mental construction that proves it to be true, and the communication between mathematicians only serves as a means to create the same mental process in different minds." https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intuitionism/). Nothing wrong with intuition as a starting point, but as you point out, it surely can't be a justification in and of itself - what happens when people's intuitions about what is right don't agree? I wonder what discipline tackles that kind of problem..?
I also wonder how the author would react if a philosopher had said they'd heard of this thing called 'Category Theory' and thought it would be interesting to apply a topological transformation to find the homomorphism between Kant and Nietzsche and then started talking about the influence of German beer on their thought? It would make about as much sense as this paper.