The line he uses at his going away party is somewhat related, “I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.”
They have a mandate to grant patents. They have a certain budget to fulfill that mandate. I imagine (although I don't know) that they do the best they can to grant valid patents within those constraints.
I very strongly disagree with the use of the phrase "equally unjust." It sounds like false equivalence (unless I misread your comment). The western world largely is better than Russia in matters of freedom of speech/expression. Your comment then segues into conspiracy?
Just to reiterate, I agree with the bulk of your comment, but I felt compelled to comment on your last paragraph.
I believe that he wasn't saying that you misspelt the word, he was saying that infringement does not equal 'stealing.'
Infringement is probably within the scope of appropriation which is the number 2 definition you listed, but maybe it shouldn't be. Conflating real theft with copyright infringement is confusing, and unnecessary.
If I've misinterpreted anything then please ignore.
I'm not sure if it's what OP meant though.