> I agree it would have been nicer if the message was more polite. But if you compare that to having the backbone follow through with meaningful long-term changes against a corporation you don't trust or respect, there shouldn't even be a discussion.
You’re framing it as either/or when it isn’t. You can push for real change and communicate like an adult. The two aren’t in conflict; often they reinforce each other.
Python’s PEP 723 (Inline script metadata) has a section summarising why they couldn’t take this approach under “Why not infer the requirements from import statements?”
If I’m hiring a web developer and you give me a `resume.html` you’d best believe I’m viewing source on that.
This is a high-risk high-reward game, because if it’s clean you’ll get bonus points, but if there’s unnecessary cruft (as defined by me) you’ll loose points.
For example, while this is pretty clean code, I’m currently on my phone and getting horizontal scroll bars. For a text based site like this resume that shouldn’t happen, and perhaps unfairly, that’s going to weigh heavily against the other good work OP has done.
A lot of people here are assuming this will involve API calls to OpenAI’s servers.
If a deal is made it will almost certainly be to self host OpenAI’s models, the same way Microsoft does. Apple will use RAG to ground requests in the user’s own iCloud data, and no user data will be sent to OpenAI or be used to train any OpenAI models.
“The maximum size of a key value store is 5 MB, and you can associate a single key value store to each function. The maximum size of a key is 512 bytes. Values can be up to 1KB in size.“
You’re framing it as either/or when it isn’t. You can push for real change and communicate like an adult. The two aren’t in conflict; often they reinforce each other.