You don't seem to see the difference between the letter and the spirit.
Sure, Tusky complies with the letter of the definition; that doesn't make it moral
This is what Stallman said:
> If a free program has a malicious feature, other developers in the community will take it out, and you can use the corrected version. You can also run free application programs and tools on nonfree operating systems; this falls short of fully giving you freedom, but many users do it.
I live in a country which uses both (it's moving towards white lights but it's not uniform), and I like yellow lights MUCH better. The very bright white lights just hurt my eyes.
Depends on how you do it. Of course if you want to move instantly then that's gonna be hard. But slowly moving isn't that bad, or creating new projects somewhere else and slowly porting old ones.
Even then, it's possible that just companies that planned to buy GHE will simply not buy it and use something open source instead.
No, but GHE is paid software. And not like it's impossible to migrate, it's just a fancy git frontend after all. Gogs/Gitea/Gitlab CE is completely capable of doing what it does.
And neither does it violate any similar law (because not many people know, but the DMCA is not an idea from the US, just barely the US implementation of the 1996 WIPO treaty), in the European Union or anywhere else.
So it really, isn't illegal anywhere (well except obviously authoritarian regimes).
It's copy-pasting from stackoverflow except a little faster.