We are a small consulting shop, slowly moving to build bootstrapped products, currently looking for a frontend software engineer.
The candidate should be familiar with modern web technologies. Experience in writing games is a plus but not required. We build our new products with Dart (both frontend and backend), non-fancy SQL DB and common sense.
Shameful plug: with a few friends we are planning to create another platform for such fun games. If you think it is a good idea, please sign up: https://www.botolympiad.com/
Randomizing children at hospitals would likely have big negative impact on society. On the long term, everyone would loose social cohesion because of the lack of bonds between brothers, nieces, whatever.
Families would lose every incentive to have a child in the first place, if it would be randomly switch to another (things like inheritance, family history and lineage comes in my mind). On the other hand, adoption would surely skyrocket.
Last time I've tried to install (~ 9-10 months ago):
- Stash: it was a no-brainer (easy setup, easy use).
- GitLab: hours spent with frustration (hard to setup, but this might have changed now, I need to try it again).
Stash seem to have a larger team behind it, with more features, documentation and snappier responses, but GitLab is promising too. I hope they all can be profitable and keep up the speed of improvements in all of the products.
If you publish something, it can be read everywhere. There should be no surprise that people will judge your words based on their customs, on their laws, on their terms, and they will act within their jurisdiction.
But that goes both ways: if a "Nigerian prince" scams you, you will not stop just because you were originally out of his jurisdiction.
I think Tim O'Reilly or Jeff Jarvis or Clay Shirky (unfortunately I don't have the bookmark anymore) already addressed this:
The case is a prime example that what you write is not only the jurisdiction where you write it, but also the jurisdiction where people read it. (And the jurisdiction where it stored and where it is going through as network traffic.)
Is there any benefit to use Presto on top of Riak or ElasticSearch (assuming someone writes the required connectors)? What are the main differences there?
I agree, banks and financial institutions are data driven businesses.
I have seen several banks from inside, and most of them think that they are driven by financial analysts, figuring out clever equations for managing money (e.g. lending rules, mortgage policies, etc), while IT is just a cost center for tracking the transactions. It's old school, and they change very slowly.
Sooner or later they shall realize that the transaction data they are tracking is a good source of information, and they could use "hard" data (through some machine learning and data mining), instead of or alongside of the "soft" intuition of their analysts.
I assume you have 'events' that you will 'merge' together in a single state object (in case you want to display something). So the operation is to fetch every related event, merge, display.
Now the 'folding' can be defined as snapshotting the 'merged state'. Instead of fetching 10 events, after the folding + GC, you will fetch e.g. 2 + the folded one. You are saving some CPU and bandwidth over time and that's it.
> but if each user action that triggered a one cell update becomes an event I have to keep forever, I see my database size exploding
I think there might be a balance here: you can always garbage-collect events that are already merged in an updated value of the given object. Depending on the requirement, this GC can be done e.g. after days or after months of that merge...
It's not about questioning the law, it's about uncovering the internal works of the law. My previous readings pointed to this bill as one of the earliest regulations that was used by everything in plain text. A nice way to describe backdoors without saying them explicitly, especially if the product claims to be secure from snooping. But what message does it send that the law orders you to screw your customers?
This specific bill might have died (I'm sure the patriot act superseded it), but every NSA-related revelation (and the FBI ones ~3 years ago) point in a direction that something similar is still in effect.
"Comprehensive Counter-Terrorism Act of 1991"
"Sponsor: Sen Biden, Joseph R., Jr. [DE] (introduced 1/24/1991)"
"Cosponsor: [...] Sen Reid, Harry [NV] - 1/30/1991"
"It is the sense of Congress that providers of electronic communications services and manufacturers of electronic communications service equipment shall ensure that communications systems permit the government to obtain the plain text contents of voice, data, and other communications when appropriately authorized by law."
Not entirely true. You can always offer to provide them electricity at a lower cost than they would get from the nuclear plants. There is a cross-country marketplace for electricity in the EU, and probably nobody will stop you to sell such thing to Japan.
> "Which might explain why some people describe their purchase as watery and bland."
This is true.
The other part of the explanation is that many people just don't appreciate the coffee that is anything different than what they are used too. Just watch someone from the US in Europe drinking an espresso, or the other way around. People have different opinions based on their personal habits, and saying it is "watered down" should mean nothing without context and references.