There are a lot of papers that stumble upon this while working with LLMs and its mentioned off hand in the conclusions. If you want a paper that explicitly tested this here you go - https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.437.pdf
I am immediately doubtful of everything out of lesswrong.com So doubtful, in fact, that I won't even read the article. Best of luck to those who choose to do it.
These numbers mean nothing. Just raw numbers in a vacuum. Facebook is worthless and it's visit count means nothing. Same with instagram or twitter. The only reason google is so high is due to it being a search engine. These numbers are not the gotcha you seem to be implying they are.
Can someone with more context explain why it looks like the Rust Foundation is shooting themselves in the foot? Is there an angle to this that I am missing?